scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Promoting safer sex in the context of heterosexual anal intercourse: A scoping review

TLDR
In this paper, the authors locate and summarize existing literature regarding safer sex practices specific to heterosexual anal intercourse and identify promising health promotion strategies, based on Arksey and O'Malley's 2005 five-step methodology.
Abstract
Aims and objectives To locate and summarize existing literature regarding safer sex practices specific to heterosexual anal intercourse and identify promising health promotion strategies. Background Much of the literature regarding anal intercourse and safer sex is related to men who have sex with men. However, some studies suggest there are more women than men engaging in unprotected receptive anal intercourse. The risks associated with this sexual practice have been well documented, although many health care providers fail to ask about anal intercourse while addressing safer sex in the heterosexual population. Design The study was based on Arksey and O'Malley's 2005 five-step methodology. Methods A search was conducted of MEDLINE; CINAHL; PsycInfo; Cochrane; and PubMed. Databases were searched from 1990-2020. The 72 studies selected were classified according to their main area of focus. A grey literature search was also included. This scientific submission has been assessed for accuracy and completeness using the PRISMA-ScR guideline criteria (Supplementary File 1). Results The literature in this area is heterogeneous in terms of method and topic. Prevalence and incidence (n=26) in addition to sexually transmitted infection risks (n=26) related to heterosexual anal intercourse are well understood. However, there is limited information on condom use (n=6), factors that influence heterosexual anal intercourse (n=10), and health promotion strategies for this population and practice (n=4). Two websites that mentioned heterosexual anal intercourse risk reduction activities were included. Conclusions Although heterosexual anal intercourse appears to be an increasingly common sexual practice, very little is known about health promotion strategies nurses might utilize for encouraging safer sex in this population. Relevance to clinical practice Increased awareness of the prevalence and risks of heterosexual anal intercourse could enhance nurses' harm reduction strategies. Screening for sexually transmitted infections may be based on incorrect assumptions about sexual practices or due to stigma linked with anal intercourse. Reducing unprotected heterosexual anal intercourse will reduce sexually transmitted infections and their long term sequelae.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Young women and anal sex

Tabitha M. Gana, +1 more
- 11 Aug 2022 - 
TL;DR: Clinicians reluctance to discuss possible harms is letting down a generation of women as mentioned in this paper , who are concerned about their health and well-being, and their ability to protect themselves.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Penis, the Vagina and HIV Risk: Key Differences (Aside from the Obvious)

TL;DR: The local immune environment at the site of HIV exposure is an important determinant of whether exposure during sex will lead to productive infection, and the vaginal and penile immune milieus are each critically shaped by the local microbiome.
Journal ArticleDOI

Changes in Sexual Behaviors with Opposite-Sex Partners and Sexually Transmitted Infection Outcomes Among Females and Males Ages 15–44 Years in the USA: National Survey of Family Growth, 2008–2019

TL;DR: In this article , the authors used survey-weighted linear or logistic regression to evaluate linear temporal trends in sexual behaviors with opposite-sex partners, network attributes, and STI testing, treatment, and diagnosis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

TL;DR: A framework for conducting a scoping study is outlined based on recent experiences of reviewing the literature on services for carers for people with mental health problems and it is suggested that a wider debate is called for about the role of the scoped study in relation to other types of literature reviews.
Journal ArticleDOI

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

TL;DR: A PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was needed to provide reporting guidance for this specific type of knowledge synthesis and was developed according to published guidance by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research) Network for the development of reporting guidelines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Health Inequalities Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications

TL;DR: The theory of fundamental causes of the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and mortality has persisted despite radical changes in the diseases and risk factors that are presumed to explain it is explained.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities.

TL;DR: This work provides illustrative evidence on the health consequences of stigma and presents a conceptual framework describing the psychological and structural pathways through which stigma influences health.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (2)
Is anal sex safe?

The paper does not directly answer the question about the safety of anal sex. The paper focuses on the lack of information on health promotion strategies for safer sex in the context of heterosexual anal intercourse.