scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Receptor Conversion in Distant Breast Cancer Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Receptor conversion for ERα, PR, and HER2 occurs frequently in the course of disease progression in breast cancer, and large prospective studies assessing the impact of receptor conversion on treatment efficacy and survival are needed.
Abstract
Background: In metastatic breast cancer, hormone and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy decision-making is still largely based on tissue characteristics of the primary tumor. However, a change of estrogen receptor alpha (ERa), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status in distant metastases has frequently been reported. The actual incidence of this phenomenon has been debated. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis including 39 studies assessing receptor conversion from primary breast tumors to paired distant breast cancer metastases. We noted the direction of change (positive to negative or vice versa) and performed subgroup analyses for different thresholds for positivity, the type of test used to assess HER2 receptor status, and metastasis location-specific differences (two-sided tests). Results: Overall, the incidence of receptor conversion varied largely between studies. For ERa, PR, and HER2, we found that random effects pooled positive to negative conversion percentages of 22.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] ¼ 16.4% to 30.0%), 49.4% (95% CI ¼ 40.5% to 58.2%), and 21.3% (95% CI ¼ 14.3% to 30.5%), respectively. Negative to positive conversion percentages were 21.5% (95% CI ¼ 18.1% to 25.5%), 15.9% (95% CI ¼ 11.3% to 22.0%), and 9.5% (95% CI ¼ 7.4% to 12.1%). Furthermore, ERa discordance was statistically significantly higher in the central nervous system and bone compared with liver metastases (20.8%, 95% CI ¼ 15.0% to 28.0%, and 29.3%, 95% CI ¼ 13.0% to 53.5%, vs 14.3%, 95% CI ¼ 11.3% to 18.1, P ¼ .008 and P < .001, respectively), and PR discordance was higher in bone (42.7%, 95% CI ¼ 35.1% to 50.6%, P < .001) and liver metastases (47.0%, 95% CI ¼ 41.0% to 53.0%, P < .001) compared with central nervous system metastases (23.3%, 95% CI ¼ 16.0% to 32.6%). Conclusions: Receptor conversion for ERa, PR, and HER2 occurs frequently in the course of disease progression in breast cancer. Large prospective studies assessing the impact of receptor conversion on treatment efficacy and survival are needed. Meanwhile, reassessing receptor status in metastases is strongly encouraged.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of distant metastasis at initial diagnosis: a population-based study

TL;DR: Both HER2+ and HR+/HER2+ subtypes were significantly associated with higher rates of liver, brain, and lung metastases, while the highest OR was observed in liver metastases.
Journal ArticleDOI

HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation.

TL;DR: This review addresses recent updates of ASCO/CAP guidelines and factors complicating in the interpretation of HER2 status in breast cancers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Focus on the glycerophosphocholine pathway in choline phospholipid metabolism of cancer.

TL;DR: This review article summarizes the recent literature on glycerophosphocholine metabolism with respect to its cancer biology and its detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy applications.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

TL;DR: A new quantity is developed, I 2, which the authors believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta-analysis, which is susceptible to the number of trials included in the meta- analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis

TL;DR: It is concluded that H and I2, which can usually be calculated for published meta-analyses, are particularly useful summaries of the impact of heterogeneity, and one or both should be presented in publishedMeta-an analyses in preference to the test for heterogeneity.
Journal ArticleDOI

QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

TL;DR: The QUADAS-2 tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.
Related Papers (5)

3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3)