scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Resistance of tropical seedlings to drought is mediated by neighbourhood diversity

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The response of experimental monocultures and mixtures of tropical trees to simulated drought reveals a fundamental shift in the nature of interactions among species, which shows that reduced competition for water among species in mixtures mediates community resistance to drought.
Abstract
Occasional periods of drought are typical of most tropical forests, but climate change is increasing drought frequency and intensity in many areas across the globe, threatening the structure and function of these ecosystems. The effects of intermittent drought on tropical tree communities remain poorly understood and the potential impacts of intensified drought under future climatic conditions are even less well known. The response of forests to altered precipitation will be determined by the tolerances of different species to reduced water availability and the interactions among plants that alleviate or exacerbate the effects of drought. Here, we report the response of experimental monocultures and mixtures of tropical trees to simulated drought, which reveals a fundamental shift in the nature of interactions among species. Weaker competition for water in diverse communities allowed seedlings to maintain growth under drought while more intense competition among conspecifics inhibited growth under the same conditions. These results show that reduced competition for water among species in mixtures mediates community resistance to drought. The delayed onset of competition for water among species in more diverse neighbourhoods during drought has potential implications for the coexistence of species in tropical forests and the resilience of these systems to climate change. Reduced competition for water among species in mixed tropical plant communities mediates community resistance to drought: weaker competition permits growth maintenance in drought, whereas stronger competition inhibits it.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

ZurichOpenRepositoryand
Archive
UniversityofZurich
UniversityLibrary
Strickhofstrasse39
CH-8057Zurich
www.zora.uzh.ch
Year:2017
Resistanceoftropicalseedlingstodroughtismediatedbyneighbourhood
diversity
O’Brien,MichaelJ;Reynolds,Glen;Ong,Robert;Hector,Andy
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0326-0
PostedattheZurichOpenRepositoryandArchive,UniversityofZurich
ZORAURL:https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-140576
JournalArticle
AcceptedVersion
Originallypublishedat:
O’Brien,MichaelJ;Reynolds,Glen;Ong,Robert;Hector,Andy(2017).Resistanceoftropicalseedlings
todroughtismediatedbyneighbourhooddiversity.NatureEcologyandEvolution,1(11):1643-1648.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0326-0

Resistance of tropical seedlings to drought is mediated by neighbourhood diversity 1
Michael J. O’Brien
1,2,3
, Glen Reynolds
2
, Robert Ong
4
and Andy Hector
5
2
1
Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 3
Carretera de Sacramento s/n, E-04120 La Cañada, Almería, Spain 4
2
Southeast Asia Rainforest Research Partnership, Danum Valley Field Centre, PO Box 5
60282, 91112 Lahad Datu, Sabah, Malaysia 6
3
URPP Global Change and Biodiversity, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 190, 8057 7
Zurich, Switzerland 8
4
Forest Research Centre, Sepilok, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia 9
5
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB UK 10
*Correspondence author e-mail: mikey.j.obrien@gmail.com 11
Title: 82 characters 12
Abstract: 201 13
Main: 1999 14
Refs: 40 15
Figures: 4 16

Occasional periods of drought are typical of most tropical forests, but climate 17
change is increasing drought frequency and intensity in many areas across the globe 18
threatening the structure and functioning of these ecosystems. However, the effects of 19
intermittent drought on tropical tree communities remain poorly understood and the 20
potential impacts of intensified drought under future climatic conditions are even less 21
well known. The response of forests to altered precipitation will be determined by the 22
tolerances of different species to reduced water availability and the interactions among 23
plants that alleviate or exacerbate the effects of drought. Here we report the response 24
of experimental monocultures and mixtures of tropical trees to simulated drought that 25
reveal a fundamental shift in the nature of interactions among species. Weaker 26
competition for water in diverse communities allowed seedlings to maintain growth 27
under drought while more intense competition among conspecifics inhibited growth 28
under the same conditions. These results show that reduced competition for water 29
among species in mixtures mediates community resistance to drought. The delayed 30
onset of competition for water among species in more diverse neighbourhoods during 31
drought has potential implications for the coexistence of species in tropical forests and 32
the resilience of these systems to climate change. 33
Many types of tropical forests are characterized by constant temperature and 34
humidity, typically experiencing regular rainfall evenly distributed throughout the year. 35
However, rain forests often experience infrequent droughts, during El Niño Southern 36
Oscillation (ENSO) years for example, although the effect of these events on forest structure 37
and functioning is poorly understood
1,2
. On the one hand, drought could increase the success 38
of some species putting them at an advantage, increasing dominance and potentially 39
decreasing diversity
3
. Alternatively, drought could promote diversity by enhancing density-40
dependent mechanisms that favour uncommon species
4
. For example, drought may increase 41

intraspecific competition for light, water and associated soil resources or predispose trees to 42
pathogen infection or insect attack
5–7
, both density-dependent mechanisms that can influence 43
community diversity
8–10
. 44
Although light is usually considered the most important resource gradient driving 45
species distributions in tropical forests
7
, climate change is projected to increase the severity 46
and frequency of drought for substantial areas of tropical forest
1,11
thereby increasing the 47
importance of water limitation as a driver of species distributions
12
. These changes pose a 48
potential risk to these hyper-diverse ecosystems due to negative effects on reproduction
13
, 49
recruitment
13
, growth
3,14
and survival
3,15
. Species diversity may provide an insurance effect 50
against these alterations and provide stability under drought conditions
16,17
because species 51
vary in their resistance and resilience to severe climatic disturbances
3,18
. Although, if 52
conditions go beyond the physiological limits of even the tolerant species, then large-scale 53
mortality will occur regardless
19
. However, there is limited empirical evidence regarding the 54
direction and magnitude of the interactions between drought and tree diversity as research has 55
largely focused on shifts of species distributions and functional composition
12,15,20
. 56
Here we test how drought affects interactions among tropical tree seedlings in 57
monocultures and mixtures of different species. We used rainfall-exclusion shelters to reduce 58
soil water availability while altering tree seedling diversity by manipulating neighbourhood 59
richness around focal individuals (Fig. 1). Ecological theory predicts that competition for 60
limited resources is more intense when species and individuals are more similar and closely 61
related
21,22
. Therefore, neighbourhood diversity consisted of three treatments in which a focal 62
individual was surrounded by 3 individuals of the same, or 3 different, species as follows: 1) 63
a focal seedling surrounded by seedlings of 3 different species than those used as the focal 64
species (mixtures), 2) monocultures of a focal seedling surrounded by 3 seedlings originating 65
from a different mature tree of the same species (non-sibling) and 3) monocultures of a focal 66

seedling surrounded by 3 seedlings originating from the same mature tree as the focal 67
seedling (sibling). The third neighbourhood represents the dense aggregated seedling 68
communities that form under mature trees after mast seed production, a common 69
reproductive strategy in these ever-wet tropical forests
23
. We used the rainfall-exclusion 70
shelters for two intervals lasting 3 and 6 months over a two-year period in order to simulate 71
drought intensity similar to supra-annual droughts in Malaysian Borneo
24
(Fig. 2). We 72
monitored focal seedling growth and mortality and quantified the magnitude of drought 73
response in leaf physiology while assessing nutrient concentrations to test if drought 74
increased competition for water and nutrients. 75
Results 76
We found an interaction between the drought and diversity treatments in which the 77
strength of competition was related to seedling neighbourhood diversity under drought but 78
not ever-wet conditions (Fig. 3a). Specifically, in the monocultures (i.e. sibling and non-79
sibling treatments) relative growth rate (RGR) was significantly lower in the drought than in 80
the ever-wet treatments, but seedlings in mixtures had RGRs that were statistically 81
indistinguishable under drought and ever-wet conditions (Fig. 3b; Supplementary Table 1). 82
These results are consistent with reduced competition for water in species mixtures relative to 83
monocultures. Furthermore, average RGR over all species under drought was higher in 84
mixtures than in monocultures (reduction in RGR due to non-sibling competition = -0.06 cm 85
cm
-1
yr
-1
, -0.1 to -0.02 and reduction in RGR due to sibling competition = -0.04 cm cm
-1
yr
-1
, 86
-0.07 to 0.003). These results indicate that overall mixtures and monocultures are 87
significantly different under drought (see significant contrast × rainfall term in 88
Supplementary Table 1), but the sibling treatment is only marginally different from the 89
mixture (see neighbor × rainfall term in Supplementary Table 1). Although mortality was not 90

Figures
Citations
More filters

Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used data from 46 experiments that manipulated grassland plant diversity to test whether biodiversity provides resistance during and resilience after climate events, and found that biodiversity increased ecosystem resilience for a broad range of climate events.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diversity and forest productivity in a changing climate

TL;DR: A conceptual framework is suggested to explain the various processes leading to higher productivity of species-rich forests compared with average yields of their respective monocultures and provides three pathways for possible development of the diversity-productivity relationship under a changing climate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Forests, atmospheric water and an uncertain future: the new biology of the global water cycle

TL;DR: A review of the links between vegetation-cover and climate with a focus on forests and rain (precipitation) can be found in this article, where the authors highlight advances, uncertainties and research opportunities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Environmental heterogeneity and biotic interactions mediate climate impacts on tropical forest regeneration.

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that environmental heterogeneity is not only the main driver of seedling survival in this forest but also plays a central role in buffering or exacerbating impacts of climate fluctuations on forest regeneration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Species-rich boreal forests grew more and suffered less mortality than species-poor forests under the environmental change of the past half-century

TL;DR: Using inventory data of boreal forests of western Canada from 1958 to 2011, it is found that aboveground biomass growth increased over time in species-rich forests but decreased inspecies-poor forests, and importantly,Aboveground biomass loss from tree mortality was smaller in Species-rich than species- poor forests.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs.

TL;DR: The commonly observed high diversity of trees in tropical rain forests and corals on tropical reefs is a nonequilibrium state which, if not disturbed further, will progress toward a low-diversity equilibrium community as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical Forests

TL;DR: Any event that increases the efficiency of the predators at eating seeds and seedlings of a given tree species may lead to a reduction in population density of the adults of that species and/or to increased distance between new adults and their parents.
Book

The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection

TL;DR: Barnes & Noble Classics as mentioned in this paper is a collection of books based on the "The Origin of Species" by Charles Darwin, which is part of the "Barnes and Noble Classics" series.
MonographDOI

On the origin of the species by means of natural selection

TL;DR: One of the few revolutionary works of science that is engrossingly readable, "The Origin of Species" not only launched the science of modern biology but also has influenced virtually all subsequent literary, philosophical, and religious thinking.
Journal ArticleDOI

N : P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance

TL;DR: This review examines how variation in the relative availability of N and P, as reflected by N : P ratios of plant biomass, influences vegetation composition and functioning.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (5)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

In this paper, the authors proposed a method to solve the problem of the `` missing link '' problem. 

Neighbour treatment 2 19.4 1.18Rainfall treamtent 1 19.2 2 Neighbour x rainfall 2 17.8 0.31Variance components Var. SE Group 0.59 0.53Sub-plot:group 0.00 NA Neighbour:group 0.02 NASpecies:group -0.04 0.24 Neighbour:sub-plot:group 0.09 0.34Mixture variance 3.21 0.84 Sibling variance 3.52 0.94Non-sibling variance 3.81 0.95 d.f.: degrees of freedom (note effective df can be fractional); F: conditional F-statistic; Var.: variance component estimate; SE: standard errors of variance component; †P<0.1, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001Supplementary Fig. 1 Stomatal conductance from a dry-down pot experiment using these species. 

Source of variation d.f. denominator d.f. Fa Species 3 12 14.2***Neighbour treatment 2 5.1 6.7* Rainfall treamtent 1 4 0.5Neighbour x rainfall 2 7.6 0.3 Variance components Var. SEGroup 0.001 0.001 Sub-plot:group 0.000 0.001 Neighbour:group -0.001 0.001 Species:group 0.002 0.001 Neighbour:sub-plot:group 0.001 0.001 Mixture variance 0.007 0.002 Sibling variance 0.006 0.001Non-sibling variance 0.005 0.001 bSpecies 3 12 10.2** 

Source of variation d.f. denominator d.f. FInitial height 1 329.9 867.9***Size relative to neighbour 1 390.8 3.21† Light 1 36.7 11.61**Species 3 62 8.94*** Mix-mono contrast 1 81.6 0.56Neighbour treatment 1 76.7 0.04 Rainfall treatment 1 18.2 3.96† Species x contrast 3 236.1 2.68* Species x neighbour 3 227.2 0.43 Species x rainfall 3 56.9 0.63 Contrast x rainfall 1 76.3 4.43*Neighbour x rainfall 1 75.6 2.91† Species x contrast x rainfall 3 226.1 3.73*Species x neighbour x rainfall 3 225.9 1.33 Variance components Var. SEPlot 0.016 0.007 Sub-plot:plot 0.005 0.003 Species:plot 0.008 0.002Neighbour:sub-plot:plot 0.000 0.001 Species:sub-plot:plot -0.001 0.002Residual variance 0.028 0.003 d.f.: degrees of freedom (note effective df can be fractional); F: conditional F-statistic; Var.: variance component estimate; SE: standard errors of variance component; †P<0.1, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001Supplementary Table 2. 

Source of variation d.f. denominator d.f. FA Species 3 14.9 10.8***Neighbour treatment 2 20.1 0.2 Rainfall treatment 1 5 32.9** Neighbour x rainfall 2 20.1 8.1** Variance components Var. SEPlot 0.006 0.005 Sub-plot:plot 0.001 0.002 Species:plot 0.001 0.004Neighbour:sub-plot:plot -0.008 0.003 Residual variance 0.061 0.009b Species 3 21.1 3.1†Neighbour treatment 2 28.2 0.0 Rainfall treatment 1 7 32.5***Neighbour x rainfall 2 28.3 1.4 Variance components Var. SEPlot -0.01 0.04 Sub-plot:plot 0.05 0.04 Species:plot 0.11 0.05Neighbour:sub-plot:plot 0.04 0.03 Residual variance 0.26 0.03d.f.: degrees of freedom (note effective df can be fractional); F: conditional F-statistic; Var.: variance component estimate; SE: standard errors of variance component; †P<0.1, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001Supplementary Table 3.