scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Spotlight on S-ICD™ therapy: 10 years of clinical experience and innovation.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The S-ICD™ performance is promising even for many patients, who may not be 'classical' candidates for this technology, which sheds a spotlight on S- ICD™ therapy in recently discovered fields of indication beyond ideal preconditions.
Abstract
Subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD™) therapy has been established in initial clinical trials and current international guideline recommendations for patients without demand for pacing, cardiac resynchronization, or antitachycardia pacing. The promising experience in 'ideal' S-ICD™ candidates increasingly encourages physicians to provide the benefits of S-ICD™ therapy to patients in clinical constellations beyond 'classical' indications of S-ICD™ therapy, which has led to a broadening of S-ICD™ indications in many centres. However, the decision for S-ICD™ implantation is still not covered by controlled randomized trials but rather relies on patient series or observational studies. Thus, this review intends to give a contemporary update on available empirical evidence data and technical advancements of S-ICD™ technology and sheds a spotlight on S-ICD™ therapy in recently discovered fields of indication beyond ideal preconditions. We discuss the eligibility for S-ICD™ therapy in Brugada syndrome as an example for an adverse and dynamic electrocardiographic pattern that challenges the S-ICD™ sensing and detection algorithms. Besides, the S-ICD™ performance and defibrillation efficacy in conditions of adverse structural remodelling as exemplified for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is discussed. In addition, we review recent data on potential device interactions between S-ICD™ systems and other implantable cardio-active systems (e.g. pacemakers) including specific recommendations, how these could be prevented. Finally, we evaluate limitations of S-ICD™ therapy in adverse patient constitutions, like distinct obesity, and present contemporary strategies to assure proper S-ICD™ performance in these patients. Overall, the S-ICD™ performance is promising even for many patients, who may not be 'classical' candidates for this technology.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the EFFORTLESS cohort and comparison with a meta-analysis of transvenous ICD outcomes.

TL;DR: EFFORTLESS demonstrates similar S-ICD efficacy and a nonsignificant, lower rate of IAS in channelopathy patients as compared to structural heart disease and Comparable IAS rates were achieved with the device programmed to higher rates forChannelopathy patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Der tragbare Kardioverter/Defibrillator (WCD) – Indikationen und Einsatz

TL;DR: In der kürzlich publizierten randomisierten VEST-Studie zeigte sich, bei allerdings geringer Therapieadhärenz, kein Vorteil des WCD hinsichtlich der Verhinderung des plötzlichen Herztodes dokumentiert werden.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical experience regarding safety and diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with a subcutaneous implanted cardioverter/defibrillator (S-ICD) at 1.5 T.

TL;DR: Safe 1.5 T CMR studies should not be withhold in patients with S-ICD for safety concerns and/or fear of extensive imaging artefacts precluding successful image analysis, according to the present study.
Journal ArticleDOI

Brugada syndrome: Eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after exercise stress test

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors test electrocardiographic eligibility for S-ICD placement after exercise stress testing (EST) in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) using the Boston Scientific model 2889 EMBLEM™ automated screening tool.
Journal ArticleDOI

The subcutaneous ICD for prevention of sudden cardiac death: Current evidence and future directions.

TL;DR: It is suggested that current generation S‐ICD systems may be a valid alternative in patients with an ICD indication in whom bradycardia pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy is not required due to a lower risk of system‐related problems.
References
More filters
Related Papers (5)