SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
Greg Ogrinc,Greg Ogrinc,Greg Ogrinc,Louise Davies,Louise Davies,Louise Davies,Daisy Goodman,Daisy Goodman,Paul B. Batalden,Paul B. Batalden,Frank Davidoff,David Stevens +11 more
TLDR
The development of SQUIRE 2.0 is described, intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional.Abstract:
Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org).read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence
TL;DR: A systematic review of social prescribing programmes being widely promoted and adopted in the UK National Health Service found current evidence fails to provide sufficient detail to judge either success or value for money.
Journal ArticleDOI
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review
TL;DR: Overall, the QICs included in this review reported significant improvements in targeted clinical processes and patient outcomes, which should be interpreted cautiously since fewer than a third met established quality and reporting criteria, and publication bias is likely.
Journal ArticleDOI
Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature
D Goodman,Greg Ogrinc,Louise Davies,GR Baker,Jane Barnsteiner,Tina C. Foster,K Gali,J Hilden,Leora I. Horwitz,Heather C. Kaplan,Jerome A. Leis,JC Matulis,Susan Michie,Rebecca S. Miltner,Julia Neily,William A Nelson,Matthew Niedner,Brant J Oliver,Lori Rutman,Richard Thomson,Johan Thor +20 more
TL;DR: This Explanation and Elaboration document (E&E) is a companion to the revised SQUIRE guidelines, SQUIRE 2.0, and provides examples from the published literature, and an explanation of how each reflects the intent of a specific item in SQUIRE.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reduction of severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage using a state perinatal quality collaborative.
Elliott K. Main,Valerie Cape,Anisha Abreo,Julie Vasher,Amanda Woods,Andrew Carpenter,Jeffrey B. Gould +6 more
TL;DR: An innovative collaborative quality improvement approach (mentor model) to scale up implementation of the national hemorrhage bundle was used, and participation in the collaborative was strongly associated with reductions in severe maternal morbidity among hemorrhage patients.
Journal ArticleDOI
Outpatient Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapy Synchronous Telemedicine: A Survey Study of Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Adam S. Tenforde,Haylee Borgstrom,Ginger Polich,Hannah K. Steere,Irene S. Davis,Kester Cotton,Mary O’Donnell,Julie K. Silver +7 more
TL;DR: Recognizing reduced indirect costs of care that telerehabilitation may provide along with high patient satisfaction are reasons policy makers should adopt these services into future health care delivery models.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
Tammy Hoffmann,Paul Glasziou,Isabelle Boutron,Ruairidh Milne,Rafael Perera,David Moher,Douglas G. Altman,Virginia Barbour,Helen Macdonald,Marie Johnston,Sarah E Lamb,Mary Dixon-Woods,Peter McCulloch,Jeremy C Wyatt,An-Wen Chan,Susan Michie +15 more
TL;DR: The TIDieR checklist and guide should improve the reporting of interventions and make it easier for authors to structure accounts of their interventions, reviewers and editors to assess the descriptions, and readers to use the information.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Next GME Accreditation System — Rationale and Benefits
Thomas J. Nasca,Ingrid Philibert,Timothy P. Brigham,Timothy P. Brigham,Timothy C. Flynn,Timothy C. Flynn +5 more
TL;DR: The American Council of Graduate Medical Education is moving from accrediting residency programs every 5 years to a new system for the annual evaluation of trends in measures of performance.
Journal ArticleDOI
Quality and Safety Education for Nurses.
Linda R. Cronenwett,Gwen Sherwood,Jane Barnsteiner,Joanne Disch,Jean E. Johnson,Pamela H. Mitchell,Dori Taylor Sullivan,Judith Warren +7 more
TL;DR: The authors propose statements of the knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) for each competency that should be developed during pre-licensure nursing education and invite the profession to comment on the competencies and their definitions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Planning and studying improvement in patient care : The use of theoretical perspectives
TL;DR: It is demonstrated how different theories can be used to generate testable hypotheses regarding factors that influence the implementation of change, and it shows how different theoretical assumptions lead to different quality-improvement strategies.
Journal ArticleDOI
General Competencies And Accreditation In Graduate Medical Education
TL;DR: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education decided to specify six general competencies of graduate medical education: patient care; medical knowledge; practice-based learning and improvement; professionalism; interpersonal skills and communication; and systems-based practice.