scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A good-quality nonrandomized trial of a large birth cohort indicates that infants identified with hearing loss through universal newborn screening have significantly earlier referral, diagnosis, and treatment than those identified in other ways.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. This review is an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force on universal newborn hearing screening to detect moderate-to-severe permanent, bilateral congenital hearing loss. We focus on 3 key questions: (1) Among infants identified by universal screening who would not be identified by targeted screening, does initiating treatment before 6 months of age improve language and communication outcomes? (2) Compared with targeted screening, does universal screening increase the chance that treatment will be initiated by 6 months of age for infants at average risk or for those at high risk? (3) What are the adverse effects of screening and early treatment? METHODS. Medline and Cochrane databases were searched to identify articles published since the 2002 recommendation. Data from studies that met inclusion criteria were abstracted, and studies were rated for quality with predetermined criteria. RESULTS. A good-quality retrospective study of children with hearing loss indicates that those who had early versus late confirmation and those who had undergone universal newborn screening versus none had better receptive language at 8 years of age but not better expressive language or speech. A good-quality nonrandomized trial of a large birth cohort indicates that infants identified with hearing loss through universal newborn screening have earlier referral, diagnosis, and treatment than those not screened. These findings are corroborated by multiple descriptive studies of ages of referral, diagnosis, and treatment. Usual parental reactions to an initial nonpass on a hearing screen include worry, questioning, and distress that resolve for most parents. Cochlear implants have been associated with higher risks for bacterial meningitis in young children. CONCLUSIONS. Children with hearing loss who had universal newborn hearing screening have better language outcomes at school age than those not screened. Infants identified with hearing loss through universal screening have significantly earlier referral, diagnosis, and treatment than those identified in other ways.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

What's in a Smile? Maternal Brain Responses to Infant Facial Cues

TL;DR: In this article, the authors found that dopamine-associated reward-processing regions of the brain were activated when mothers viewed their own 5- to 10-month-old infants face compared with an unknown infant's face.
Journal ArticleDOI

Outcomes of early- and late-identified children at 3 years of age: findings from a prospective population-based study.

TL;DR: Whereas the effect of age of hearing aid fitting on child outcomes was weak, a younger age at cochlear implant switch-on was significantly associated with better outcomes for children with cochLear implants at 3 years of age.
Journal ArticleDOI

Newborn hearing screening vs later hearing screening and developmental outcomes in children with permanent childhood hearing impairment.

TL;DR: Compared with distraction hearing screening, a newborn hearing screening program was associated with better developmental outcomes at age 3 to 5 years among children with permanent childhood hearing impairment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Age at Intervention for Permanent Hearing Loss and 5-Year Language Outcomes

TL;DR: Early intervention improves language outcomes, thereby lending support to streamlining clinical pathways to ensure early amplification and cochlear implantation after diagnosis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Universal Newborn Screening for Congenital CMV Infection: What Is the Evidence of Potential Benefit?

TL;DR: It is estimated that in the United States, several thousand children with congenital CMV could benefit each year from newborn CMV screening, early detection, and interventions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Language of Early- and Later-identified Children With Hearing Loss

TL;DR: Significantly better language development was associated with early identification of hearing loss and early intervention and the variable on which the two groups differed must be considered a potential explanation for the language advantage documented in the earlier-identified group.
Journal ArticleDOI

Early Intervention and Language Development in Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the relationship between age of enrollment in intervention and language outcomes at 5 years of age in a group of deaf and hard-of-hearing children.
Journal ArticleDOI

A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation.

TL;DR: The data suggest that in the absence of normal stimulation there is a sensitive period of about 3.5 yr during which the human central auditory system remains maximally plastic.
Related Papers (5)