Verifying the contract net protocol: a case study in interaction protocol and agent communication semantics

TLDR: A revised and simpler core semantics is suggested for many of the FIPA ACL speech acts, using the same belief-intention style of logic, although the underlying ideas are not dependent on this detail.

Abstract: Multi-agent conversations are built upon two components: agent communication languages (ACLs) that specify the individual messages that can be exchanged and interaction protocols (IPs) that specify the sequences in which these message can be arranged. Although informative, the semantic definition proposed for the most standard ACL (FIPA 1997) is complicated and contentious, while published IPs tend to be ambiguous, incomplete, and unverified with respect to message semantics. As a case study to clarify and help rectify these problems, we have investigated verification of the contract net protocol when its messages are presumed to be expressed in FIPA ACL. In order to help both informal comprehension and formal verification we separate several concerns. We suggest a revised and simpler core semantics for many of the FIPA ACL speech acts, using the same belief-intention style of logic, although the underlying ideas are not dependent on this detail. An extended form of propositional dynamic logic and statecharts is used to express IPs. States are interpreted using mutual beliefs and intention, and properties such as termination and consistency of joint beliefs are shown.