scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Weight Loss, HbA1c Reduction, and Tolerability of Cetilistat in a Randomized, Placebo‐controlled Phase 2 Trial in Obese Diabetics: Comparison With Orlistat (Xenical)

TLDR
Cetilistat was well tolerated, and showed fewer discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) than in the placebo and orlistat groups, and improved glycemic control relative to placebo in obese diabetic patients.
Abstract
The objective of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was to determine the efficacy and safety of cetilistat and orlistat relative to placebo in obese patients with type 2 diabetes, on metformin. Following a 2-week run-in, patients were randomized to placebo, cetilistat (40, 80, or 120 mg three times daily), or orlistat 120 mg t.i.d., for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was absolute change in body weight from baseline. Secondary endpoints included other measures of obesity and glycemic control. Similar reductions in body weight were observed in patients receiving cetilistat 80 or 120 mg t.i.d. or 120 mg t.i.d. orlistat; these reductions were significant vs. placebo (3.85 kg, P = 0.01; 4.32 kg, P = 0.0002; 3.78 kg, P = 0.008). In the 40 mg t.i.d. and placebo groups, reductions were 2.94 kg, P = 0.958 and 2.86 kg, respectively. Statistically significant reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were noted. Cetilistat was well tolerated, and showed fewer discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) than in the placebo and orlistat groups. Discontinuation in the orlistat group was significantly worse than in the 120 mg cetilistat and placebo groups and was entirely due to gastrointestinal (GI) AEs. Treatment with cetilistat 80 or 120 mg t.i.d., or with orlistat 120 mg t.i.d., significantly reduced body weight and improved glycemic control relative to placebo in obese diabetic patients. Cetilistat was well tolerated with the number of discontinuations due to AEs being similar to placebo.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Anti-Obesity Drugs: A Review about Their Effects and Safety

TL;DR: Orlistat is presently the only available choice for the treatment of obesity because of its safety for cardiovascular events and positive effects on diabetic control.
Journal ArticleDOI

Progress and challenges in anti-obesity pharmacotherapy

TL;DR: Although few promising anti-obesity medications are in the drug-development pipeline, the most promising drugs are novel molecules that are co-agonists for multiple gut hormones including GLP-1, glucagon, and gastric inhibitory peptide.
Journal ArticleDOI

Limitations in anti-obesity drug development: the critical role of hunger-promoting neurons

TL;DR: Targeting the molecular pathways that mediate the beneficial effects of calorie restriction and exercise may represent an alternative therapeutic approach for the treatment of chronic metabolic disorders such as obesity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pharmacotherapy of obesity: Available medications and drugs under investigation

TL;DR: Evidence on the food and drug administration (FDA)-approved medications, i.e., orlistat, lorcaserin, phentermine/topiramate, liraglutide and naltrexone/bupropion, is summarized and anti-obesity agents in the pipeline for potential future therapeutic use are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of lipid and carbohydrate digestive enzyme inhibitors in the management of obesity: a review of current and emerging therapeutic agents

TL;DR: This review focuses on agents purported to inhibit intestinal enzymes responsible for macronutrient digestion, and few of these agents have made it into clinical studies and without any clinical proof of concept or proven efficacy it is unlikely any will enter the market soon.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

TL;DR: The proportion of patients who maintained target glycemic levels declined markedly over 9 years of follow-up, and the progressive deterioration of diabetes control was such that after 3 years approximately 50% of patients could attain this goal with monotherapy, and by 9 years this declined to approximately 25%.
Journal ArticleDOI

Weight Gain as a Risk Factor for Clinical Diabetes Mellitus in Women

TL;DR: The relations between change in adult weight and the risk for noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus among women during 14 years of follow-up were quantified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: prevalence study in a random sample

TL;DR: Larger waist circumference identifies people at increased cardiovascular risks in people categorised by previously defined “action g126 levels” of waist circumference.
Related Papers (5)