Alexandre C. Köberle

TL;DR: Comparisons using multi-model regarding the role of DACCS in 1.5 and 2 degree scenarios are made and it is found that DACCS allows to postpone mitigation and reduce the climate policy costs.

TL;DR: It is shown that implementation of current policies leaves a median emission gap of 22.4 to 28.2 GtCO 2 eq by 2030 with the optimal pathways to implement the well below 2 °C and 1.5‬C Paris goals, which shows that all countries would need to accelerate the implementation of policies for renewable technologies, while efficiency improvements are especially important in emerging countries and fossil-fuel-dependent countries.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore 2'°C-compliant CO2 emission scenarios estimating the effort needed in other sectors of the economy to compensate for the weakening of environmental governance, potentially resulting in higher deforestation emissions.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed how country-level emission targets and carbon budgets can be derived based on such criteria and showed that effort-sharing approaches that (i) calculate required reduction targets in carbon budgets (relative to baseline budgets) and/or (ii) take into account historical emissions when determining carbon budget can lead to (large) negative remaining carbon budgets for developed countries.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present national low-emission scenarios to inform low emission development strategies for Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, EU-28, India, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russia and USA.