scispace - formally typeset
F

Fenghai Duan

Researcher at Brown University

Publications -  99
Citations -  5042

Fenghai Duan is an academic researcher from Brown University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Lung cancer & National Lung Screening Trial. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 89 publications receiving 4248 citations. Previous affiliations of Fenghai Duan include Yale University & University of Nebraska Omaha.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The national lung screening trial: Overview and study design

Constantine A. Gatsonis, +1336 more
- 01 Jan 2011 - 
TL;DR: The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) is a randomized multicenter study comparing low-dose helical computed tomography with chest radiography in the screening of older current and former heavy smokers for early detection of lung cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Results of Initial Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening for Lung Cancer

TL;DR: The NLST initial screening results are consistent with the existing literature on screening by means of low-dose CT and chest radiography, suggesting that a reduction in mortality from lung cancer is achievable at U.S. screening centers that have staff experienced in chest CT.
Journal ArticleDOI

Results of the Two Incidence Screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial

TL;DR: Low-dose CT was more sensitive in detecting early-stage lung cancers, but its measured positive predictive value was lower than that of radiography, and the two annual incidence screenings with low- dose CT resulted in a decrease in the number of advanced-stage cancers diagnosed and an increase in thenumber of early-Stage lung cancers diagnosed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Association of coronary artery calcification and mortality in the national lung screening trial: A comparison of three scoring methods

TL;DR: By using low-dose CT performed for lung cancer screening in older, heavy smokers, a simple visual assessment of CAC can be generated for risk assessment of CHD death and all-cause mortality, which is comparable to Agatston scoring and strongly associated with outcome.