There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.

Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …

I and i

다중혈관 관상동맥 환자에서 y-문합을 이용하여 양쪽 내흉동맥만을 사용한 우회술의 조기 성적

抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1（PfPMP1）与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用，在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员，通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。

疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

Machine learning

In this paper, we discuss consensus problems for networks of dynamic agents with fixed and switching topologies. We analyze three cases: 1) directed networks with fixed topology; 2) directed networks with switching topology; and 3) undirected networks with communication time-delays and fixed topology. We introduce two consensus protocols for networks with and without time-delays and provide a convergence analysis in all three cases. We establish a direct connection between the algebraic connectivity (or Fiedler eigenvalue) of the network and the performance (or negotiation speed) of a linear consensus protocol. This required the generalization of the notion of algebraic connectivity of undirected graphs to digraphs. It turns out that balanced digraphs play a key role in addressing average-consensus problems. We introduce disagreement functions for convergence analysis of consensus protocols. A disagreement function is a Lyapunov function for the disagreement network dynamics. We proposed a simple disagreement function that is a common Lyapunov function for the disagreement dynamics of a directed network with switching topology. A distinctive feature of this work is to address consensus problems for networks with directed information flow. We provide analytical tools that rely on algebraic graph theory, matrix theory, and control theory. Simulations are provided that demonstrate the effectiveness of our theoretical results.

/pdf/consensus-problems-in-networks-of-agents-with-switching-25c3hqvtd8.pdf

Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays

There is a growing interest in building autonomous systems that interact with complex environments. The difficulty associated with obtaining an accurate model for such environments poses a challenge to the task of assessing and guaranteeing the system's performance. We present a data-driven solution that allows for a system to be evaluated for specification conformance without an accurate model of the environment. Our approach involves learning a conservative reactive bound of the environment's behavior using data and specification of the system's desired behavior. First, the approach begins by learning a conservative reactive bound on the environment's actions that captures its possible behaviors with high probability. This bound is then used to assist verification, and if the verification fails under this bound, the algorithm returns counter-examples to show how failure occurs and then uses these to refine the bound. We demonstrate the applicability of the approach through two case-studies: i) verifying controllers for a toy multi-robot system, and ii) verifying an instance of human-robot interaction during a lane-change maneuver given real-world human driving data.

Counter-example Guided Learning of Bounds on Environment Behavior.

This paper presents an analysis of the dynamic sensor coverage problem with uncertainty feedback. We consider a simple case of two spatially separate uncertain systems 1 and 2. In an earlier paper we introduced the dynamic sensor coverage problem and gave two stochastic sensor motion algorithms to solve the problem. We take a deterministic approach in this paper, the sensor decides to measure system 1 or 2 based on the relative uncertainty of its estimates of the states of the two systems. Error covariance is used as a metric for uncertainty of estimates. Based on the sensor measurements the error covariance evolves according to the Lyapunov or the Riccati map. The uncertainty space is partitioned and each partition has a different sensor motion decision associated with it. For a certain class of partitions we prove the existence and local stability of a unique periodic steady state orbit. We prove global stability for a scalar special case. We also show by way of an example that by changing certain parameters in these partitions stable orbits of higher periods can be obtained. Implications of this work and comparisons with existing work in the sensor scheduling and sensor coverage literature are also presented. In the end we present a discussion on future extensions of this work. Simulation examples are provided to illustrate the main concepts

Dynamic Sensor Coverage with Uncertainty Feedback : Analysis Using Iterated Maps.

We present a Python-based software package to automatically obtain phenomenological models of input-controlled synthetic biological circuits that guide the design using chemical reaction-level descriptive models. From the parts and mechanism description of a synthetic biological circuit, it is easy to obtain a chemical reaction model of the circuit under the assumptions of mass-action kinetics using various existing tools. However, using these models to guide design decisions during an experiment is difficult due to a large number of reaction rate parameters and species in the model. Hence, phenomenological models are often developed that describe the effective relationships among the circuit inputs, outputs, and only the key states and parameters. In this paper, we present an algorithm to obtain these phenomenological models in an automated manner using a Python package for circuits with inputs that control the desired outputs. This model reduction approach combines the common assumptions of time-scale separation, conservation laws, and species9 abundance to obtain the reduced models that can be used for design of synthetic biological circuits. We consider an example of a simple gene expression circuit and another example of a layered genetic feedback control circuit to demonstrate the use of the model reduction procedure.

https://biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.15.950840v1.full.pdf

Model Reduction Tools For Phenomenological Modeling of Input-Controlled Biological Circuits

Navigation problems expressed via temporal logics show promise for autonomous robot applications due to their versatility. In this paper, we introduce a method for planning with these specifications in uncertain environments that yields guaranteed satisfaction probabilities. We show that point-based value iteration can be combined with probabilistic roadmaps to solve this planning problem over the belief space of the uncertain environment.

Temporal logic planning in uncertain environments with probabilistic roadmaps and belief spaces

http://www.nt.ntnu.no/users/skoge/prost/proceedings/ifac11-proceedings/data/html/papers/2328.pdf

Richard M. Murray

Papers

Counter-example Guided Learning of Bounds on Environment Behavior.

Dynamic Sensor Coverage with Uncertainty Feedback : Analysis Using Iterated Maps.

Model Reduction Tools For Phenomenological Modeling of Input-Controlled Biological Circuits

Temporal logic planning in uncertain environments with probabilistic roadmaps and belief spaces

Performance of Non-Homogeneous Multi-Agent Systems on a Graph