Showing papers by "Robert J. Lefkowitz published in 1991"

Model systems for the study of seven-transmembrane-segment receptors.

Abstract: PERSPECTIVES AND SUMMARy 654 SCOPE . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 655 G PROTEIN SIGNALING 655 f3,-AR AND RHODOPSIN SIGNALING: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES...... 657

G-protein-coupled receptor genes as protooncogenes: constitutively activating mutation of the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor enhances mitogenesis and tumorigenicity.

Abstract: The alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor (alpha 1B-ADR) is a member of the G-protein-coupled family of transmembrane receptors. When transfected into Rat-1 and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, this receptor induces focus formation in an agonist-dependent manner. Focus-derived, transformed fibroblasts exhibit high levels of functional alpha 1B-ADR expression, demonstrate a catecholamine-induced enhancement in the rate of cellular proliferation, and are tumorigenic when injected into nude mice. Induction of neoplastic transformation by the alpha 1B-ADR, therefore, identifies this normal cellular gene as a protooncogene. Mutational alteration of this receptor can lead to activation of this protooncogene, resulting in an enhanced ability of agonist to induce focus formation with a decreased latency and quantitative increase in transformed foci. In contrast to cells expressing the wild-type alpha 1B-ADR, focus formation in "oncomutant"-expressing cell lines appears constitutively activated with the generation of foci in unstimulated cells. Further, these cell lines exhibit near-maximal rates of proliferation even in the absence of catecholamine supplementation. They also demonstrate an enhanced ability for tumor generation in nude mice with a decreased period of latency compared with cells expressing the wild-type receptor. Thus, the alpha 1B-ADR gene can, when overexpressed and activated, function as an oncogene inducing neoplastic transformation. Mutational alteration of this receptor gene can result in the activation of this protooncogene, enhancing its oncogenic potential. These findings suggest that analogous spontaneously occurring mutations in this class of receptor proteins could play a key role in the induction or progression of neoplastic transformation and atherosclerosis.

Role of acidic amino acids in peptide substrates of the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase and rhodopsin kinase.

Abstract: The beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (beta-ARK) phosphorylates G protein coupled receptors in an agonist-dependent manner. Since the exact sites of receptor phosphorylation by beta-ARK are poorly defined, the identification of substrate amino acids that are critical to phosphorylation by the kinase are also unknown. In this study, a peptide whose sequence is present in a portion of the third intracellular loop region of the human platelet alpha 2-adrenergic receptor is shown to serve as a substrate for beta-ARK. Removal of the negatively charged amino acids surrounding a cluster of serines in this alpha 2-peptide resulted in a complete loss of phosphorylation by the kinase. A family of peptides was synthesized to further study the role of acidic amino acids in peptide substrates of beta-ARK. By kinetic analyses of the phosphorylation reactions, beta-ARK exhibited a marked preference for negatively charged amino acids localized to the NH2-terminal side of a serine or threonine residue. While there were no significant differences between glutamic and aspartic acid residues, serine-containing peptides were 4-fold better substrates than threonine. Comparing a variety of kinases, only rhodopsin kinase and casein kinase II exhibited significant phosphorylation of the acidic peptides. Unlike beta-ARK, RK preferred acid residues localized to the carboxyl-terminal side of the serine. A feature common to beta-ARK and RK was a much greater Km for peptide substrates as compared to that for intact receptor substrates.

The receptor kinase family: primary structure of rhodopsin kinase reveals similarities to the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase.

Abstract: Light-dependent deactivation of rhodopsin as well as homologous desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors involves receptor phosphorylation that is mediated by the highly specific protein kinases rhodopsin kinase (RK) and beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (beta ARK), respectively. We report here the cloning of a complementary DNA for RK. The deduced amino acid sequence shows a high degree of homology to beta ARK. In a phylogenetic tree constructed by comparing the catalytic domains of several protein kinases, RK and beta ARK are located on a branch close to, but separate from the cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C subfamilies. From the common structural features we conclude that both RK and beta ARK are members of a newly delineated gene family of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptor kinases that may function in diverse pathways to regulate the function of such receptors.

Comparative rates of desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors by the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase and the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase.

Abstract: Three separate processes may contribute to rapid beta-adrenergic receptor desensitization: functional uncoupling from the stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein Gs, mediated by phosphorylation of the receptors by two distinct kinases, the specific beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (beta ARK) and the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA), as well as a spatial uncoupling via sequestration of the receptors away from the cell surface. To evaluate the relative importance and potential role of the various processes in different physiological situations, a kinetic analysis of these three mechanisms was performed in permeabilized A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells. To allow a separate analysis of each mechanism, inhibitors of the various desensitization mechanisms were used: heparin to inhibit beta ARK, the PKA inhibitor peptide PKI to inhibit PKA, and concanavalin A treatment to prevent sequestration. Isoproterenol-induced phosphorylation of beta 2 receptors in these cells by beta ARK occurred with a t1/2 of less than 20 sec, whereas phosphorylation by PKA had a t1/2 of about 2 min. Similarly, beta ARK-mediated desensitization of the receptors proceeded with a t1/2 of less than 15 sec, and PKA-mediated desensitization with a t1/2 of about 3.5 min. Maximal desensitization mediated by the two kinases corresponded to a reduction of the signal-transduction capacity of the receptor/adenylyl cyclase system by about 60% in the case of beta ARK and by about 40% in the case of PKA. Receptor sequestration was much slower (t1/2 of about 10 min) and involved no more than 30% of the cell surface receptors. It is concluded that beta ARK-mediated phosphorylation is the most rapid and quantitatively most important factor contributing to the rapid desensitization. This rapidity of the beta ARK-mediated mechanism makes it particularly well suited to regulate beta-adrenergic receptor function in rapidly changing environments such as the synaptic cleft.

Regulation of Adrenergic Receptor Responsiveness Through Modulation of Receptor Gene Expression

Abstract: Multiple mechanisms contribute to the regulation of G protein-coupled receptors and their transmembrane signaling. Post-translational modifications of the receptors, such as phosphorylation, and changes in receptor gene expression can occur in either a strictly agonist-dependent fashion or through second messenger-mediated autoregulation. We have shown that modulation of receptor gene expression contributes to the responsiveness of adrenergic and related receptors. Recent evidence for post-transcriptional regulation, as well as the stimulation of transcription in an autoregulatory manner, indicates the unanticipated variety and complexity of mechanisms regulating adrenergic receptor responsiveness.

A small region of the beta-adrenergic receptor is selectively involved in its rapid regulation.

Abstract: Plasma membrane receptors that couple to guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) undergo a variety of rapid (minutes) and longer term (hours) regulatory processes induced by ligands. For the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (beta 2AR), the rapid processes include functional desensitization, mediated by phosphorylation of the receptor by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase and the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase, as well as a loss of hydrophilic ligand binding proposed to represent sequestration of receptors into a cellular compartment distinct from the plasma membrane. The slower processes include beta 2AR down-regulation (i.e., a decrease in the total cellular complement of receptors). It is not yet known whether beta 2AR phosphorylation and/or sequestration are prerequisites for down-regulation of the receptor. Like other G protein-coupled receptors, the beta 2AR molecule spans the plasma membrane seven times, and the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal domain has been proposed to contain molecular determinants for each of these regulatory processes. We replaced four serine and threonine residues located within a 10-amino acid segment of this domain of beta 2AR and thereby prevented agonist-promoted phosphorylation, sequestration, and rapid desensitization of the adenylyl cyclase response. In contrast, these mutations did not affect functional coupling to the stimulatory G protein Gs or long-term down-regulation. These findings thus define a small, hitherto unappreciated region of the receptor molecule that may selectively subserve its rapid regulation. In addition, with the demonstration that beta 2AR does not have to be phosphorylated or sequestered in order to enter the down-regulation pathway, the results suggest that the classical receptor endocytosis model may not be appropriate for beta 2AR regulation.

The alpha 1C-adrenergic receptor: characterization of signal transduction pathways and mammalian tissue heterogeneity.

Abstract: We recently reported the cloning of a novel alpha 1-adrenergic receptor (AR), the alpha 1CAR. By transient and stable expression of the alpha 1CAR and the previously cloned alpha 1BAR in COS-7 and HeLa cells, respectively, we have now compared their ability to interact with major signal-transduction pathways (including polyphosphoinositide hydrolysis, intracellular calcium, and cAMP metabolism), as well as their mammalian tissue localization. Both alpha 1C- and alpha 1BARs primarily couple to phospholipase C via a pertussis toxin-insensitive GTP-binding protein, leading to the release of calcium from intracellular stores. Even though alpha 1C- and alpha 1BARs activate polyphosphoinositide hydrolysis by similar biochemical mechanisms, the alpha 1CAR couples to phospholipase C more efficiently than does the alpha 1BAR; activation of the alpha 1CAR results in a 2-3-fold greater increase in inositol phosphates, compared with the alpha 1BAR. Both alpha 1AR subtypes can also increase intracellular cAMP, by a mechanism that does not involve direct activation of adenylyl cyclase. In agreement with ligand binding data, the agonist methoxamine and the antagonist WB4101 are 10-fold more potent in activating or inhibiting, respectively, the ability of the alpha 1CAR to stimulate phospholipase C, compared with the alpha 1BAR. In addition, methoxamine is almost a full agonist at the alpha 1CAR, whereas it can only weakly activate the alpha 1BAR. Tissue localization, using Northern blot analysis of total and poly(A)+-selected RNA from rabbit tissues, revealed striking mammalian species heterogeneity. As previously described, the alpha 1BAR is present in several rat tissues, including heart, liver, brain, kidney, lung, and spleen, whereas the alpha 1CAR is not present in any rat tissue studied. The alpha 1BAR is also present in rabbit aorta, heart, spleen, and kidney (and absent in rabbit liver), whereas the alpha 1CAR is present in rabbit liver. Our results indicate that the cloning and expression of different alpha 1AR subtypes represents a valuable tool to elucidate functional correlates of alpha 1AR heterogeneity.

Mutations of the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor that impair coupling to Gs interfere with receptor down-regulation but not sequestration.

Abstract: The integrity of coupling of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (beta 2AR) to its guanine nucleotide-binding protein, Gs, and phosphorylation events on the receptor molecule have been proposed to be important determinants in the processes of receptor sequestration and down-regulation. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying these processes, and the regions of the receptor molecule that specifically subserve sequestration and down-regulation have yet to be delineated. To address these questions, we stably transfected eight mutant beta 2AR genes into Chinese hamster fibroblasts and evaluated the coupling, sequestration, and down-regulation properties of the mutated receptors. These mutant receptors have been previously demonstrated either to exhibit abnormal coupling to Gs or to lack functionally important phosphorylation sites for either the cAMP-dependent protein kinase or the agonist-dependent beta-adrenergic receptor kinase. All eight mutants exhibited receptor sequestration equivalent in extent to that of the beta 2AR, regardless of their coupling or phosphorylation status. However, four mutants that exhibited various degrees of impairment in coupling to Gs showed blunted receptor down-regulation patterns. Simultaneous treatment with isoproterenol and dibutyryl-cAMP did not improve the abilities of the mutant receptors to undergo down-regulation. These findings demonstrate that a variety of mutant beta 2AR with impaired coupling to Gs are, nevertheless, able to be sequestered normally. In contrast, agonist-induced down-regulation appears to require coupling of the beta 2AR to Gs but is largely independent of the generation of cAMP. Our results also suggest that molecular determinants of the beta 2AR involved in receptor sequestration are distinct from those participating in the down-regulation process.

Functional interactions of recombinant alpha 2 adrenergic receptor subtypes and G proteins in reconstituted phospholipid vesicles.

Abstract: The functional interaction of the recombinant alpha 2 adrenergic receptor subtypes, alpha 2-C10 (the human platelet alpha 2 receptor, equivalent to the alpha 2 A subtype) and alpha 2-C4 (an alpha 2 receptor subtype cloned from a human kidney cDNA library), with G proteins was characterized in an in vitro reconstitution system. These receptor subtypes were overexpressed in COS-7 cells and were purified to a specific activity of 1.1-3.3 nmol/mg of protein. The G proteins consisted of Gs (adenylyl cyclase stimulatory) and members of the inhibitory family, including Gi1, Gi2, and Gi3, and G0. The cloned alpha subunits of these G proteins were overexpressed in Escherichia coli and were purified to homogeneity. Prior to use, G holoproteins were prepared by mixing the alpha subunits with beta gamma subunits that had been purified from bovine brain. Following reconstitution into phospholipid vesicles, both alpha 2 receptor subtypes could couple to the inhibitory G proteins but not to Gs, as assessed by agonist stimulation of GTPase activity. The pharmacological specificity of this interaction was preserved with respect to the two receptor subtypes. Between the different inhibitory G proteins, the alpha 2-C10 adrenergic receptor subtype showed the following preference: Gi3 greater than Gi1 greater than or equal to Gi2 greater than G0. The stimulation of GTPase activity (turnover number) ranged from 6.4-fold (Gi3) to 1.5-fold (G0). The preference of G-protein interaction for the alpha 2-C4 receptor subtype was the same as that observed for the alpha 2-C10, but the extent of activation was slightly lower. The results show that in vitro each of the alpha 2 adrenergic receptor subtypes can activate multiple G proteins but that clear preferences exist with respect to the individual inhibitory G-protein subtypes. Additionally, it appears that alpha 2-C10 is coupled more efficiently to G-protein activation than is alpha 2-C4.

Structure and Regulation of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: The β2-Adrenergic Receptor as a Model

Abstract: Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the major findings concerning the structure and coupling properties of G protein-coupled receptors and describes what is currently known about the pathways and mechanisms regulating trans-membrane signaling at the receptor level. One of the major classes of cell-surface receptors is coupled to specific intracellular effectors via guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins). Based upon the earlier pharmacological development of highly specific, high-affinity radioligands, all of the major catecholamine-related G protein-coupled receptors have now been purified, cloned, and sequenced. From this information, in turn, has come the cloning of discrete receptor sub-subtypes, several of which were not previously known to exist. Since the cloning of the first G protein-coupled receptor, this gene family has grown considerably and includes such diverse members as the receptors that bind amine ligands (adrenergic, serotonergic, dopaminergic), muscarinic acetylcholine ligands, peptides (substance P, substance K, angiotensin), glycoprotein hormones [luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin (CG), follicle-stimulating hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone], and the visual pigments. Structural similarities among these groups of G protein-coupled receptors are evident from an alignment of the primary sequences of 30 receptors.

Beta-Adrenergic Receptors

Abstract: The catecholamines epinephrine and norepinephrine evoke specific beta-adrenergic responses in a variety of tissues.Examples of processes modulated by these agonists are chronotropic and inotropic cardiac responses, relaxation of smooth muscle, and lipolysis in adipose tissue.The facts that beta-adrenergic responses are limited to specific tissues and that there exist stereospecific constraints, i.e., the naturally occurring (-)-isomers of the catecholamines are more potent than the (+)-isomers, imply a recognition system based on stereocomplementarity (Gilbert and Greenberg, 1984).These observations, based on adrenergic responses, reinforce one of the underlying tenets of pharmacology and therapeutics: The specific actions of hormones and neurotransmitters result from high-affinity, stereospecific interactions with tissues.The concept of an entity or substance that recognizes and discriminates on the basis of geometric properties of hormones or drugs has been evolving for more than a century (Langley, 1905; Dale,1906).This proposed moiety has been functionally designated “receptor.” Receptors are defined by their ability to recognize hormones or drugs of a specific class through direct binding interactions and, of equal importance, translate the binding interactions and, of equal importance, translate the binding event into a biological response.

Mechanisms of Ligand-Induced Desensitization of Beta-Adrenergic Receptors

Abstract: Attenuation of responsiveness to extracellular signal molecules (neurotransmitters, hormones, growth factors, and so on) is a cellular regulatory mechanism commonly observed in organisms from microbes to mammals. In the slime mold Dictyostelium, desensitization to an extracellular signal, cyclic AMP, is programmed to facilitate a periodic synchronous behavior that fosters aggregation within the cellular population (Devreotes and Zigmond, 1988). In the mammalian nervous and endocrine systems, desensitization to the effects of neurotransmitters and hormones may be a mechanism for maintenance of target cell function within normal limits (Perkins et al., 1982; Harden, 1983; Sibley and Lefkowitz, 1985; Benovic et al., 1988)

Structure and function of the adrenergic receptor family.

Abstract: The interaction of hormones and drugs with their respective targets has been widely studied with the hope that a better understanding of the molecular basis of their actions would provide insights not only into the nature of their specific mechanisms but those involved in certain pathophysiologic states. Receptors represent the central locus of interaction between ligands/drugs and cells. Adrenergic receptors because of their ubiquitous and well defined effector mechanisms have been excellent models for the study of these processes. Catecholamines and various synthetic analogs bind to adrenergic receptors that are integral membrane proteins and lead to the generation of intracellular second messengers culminating in a physiologic response. As with many other types of receptors this cascade of events is mediated by specific effector molecules which are coupled to adrenergic receptors in the plasma membrane. These intermediary signal transducing proteins are called guanine nucleotide regulatory proteins or G-proteins because they bind and hydrolyze guanine nucleotide triphosphate (1).