scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Thordur Sigmundsson published in 1996"


Journal ArticleDOI
Dieter B. Wildenauer1, Sibylle G. Schwab1, Margot Albus, Joachim Hallmayer2, Bernard Lerer, Wolfgang Maier1, Douglas Blackwood3, Walter J. Muir3, David St Clair3, S. W. Morris3, Hans W. Moises4, Liu Yang4, H. Kristbjarnarson, Tómas Helgason, Claudia Wiese4, David A. Collier5, Peter Holmans6, Jo Daniels6, Mark I. Rees6, Philip Asherson6, Queta Roberts6, Alastair G. Cardno6, Maria Arranz5, Homero Vallada5, David Ball5, Hiroshi Kunugi5, Robin M. Murray5, John Powell5, Sin Nanko7, Pak C. Sham5, Michael Gill8, Peter McGuffin6, Michael J. Owen6, Ann E. Pulver9, Stylianos E. Antonarakis10, Robert Babb9, Jean-Louis Blouin10, Nicola DeMarchi11, Beth A. Dombroski12, David E. Housman13, Maria Karayiorgou14, Jurg Ott14, Laura Kasch9, Haig H. Kazazian12, Virginia K. Lasseter9, Erika Loetscher15, Hermann Luebbert, Gerald Nestadt9, Carl Ton13, Paula S. Wolyniec9, Claudine Laurent16, Michel de Chaldée16, Florence Thibaut, M. Jay, Danièle Samolyk16, Michel Petit, Dominique Campion, Jacques Mallet16, Richard E. Straub17, C J MacLean17, Stephen M. Easter17, F. Anthony O'Neill18, Dermot Walsh, Kenneth S. Kendler17, Pablo V. Gejman19, Qiuhe Cao19, Elliot S. Gershon19, Judith A. Badner19, Ethiopia Beshah19, Jing Zhang19, Brien P. Riley20, Swarnageetha Rajagopalan20, Mpala Mogudi-Carter, Trefor Jenkins21, Robert Williamson20, Lynn E. DeLisi22, Chad Garner, Mary Kelly, Carrie LeDuc, Lon R. Cardon, Jay B. Lichter, Tim Harris, J. Loftus23, Gail Shields22, Margarite Comasi24, Antonio Vita24, Angela B. Smith22, Jay Dann23, Geoff Joslyn, Hugh Gurling25, Gursharan Kalsi25, J Brynjolfsson26, David Curtis27, Thordur Sigmundsson25, R Butler25, T Read25, P Murphy25, Andrew Chih-Hui Chen25, Hannes Petursson26, Bill Byerley28, Mark Hoff28, John Holik28, Hilary Coon28, Douglas F. Levinson29, Derek J. Nancarrow30, Derek J. Nancarrow31, Raymond R. Crowe32, Nancy C. Andreasen32, Jeremy M. Silverman33, Richard C. Mohs33, Larry J. Siever33, Jean Endicott34, Lawrence Sharpe34, Marilyn K. Walters31, David P. Lennon30, Nicholas K. Hayward31, Lodewijk A. Sandkuijl35, Bryan J. Mowry30, Harald N. Aschauer, K. Meszaros, Elisabeth Lenzinger, Karoline Fuchs, Angela M. Heiden, Leonid Kruglyak13, Mark J. Daly13, Tara C. Matise34 
TL;DR: Results are interpreted as inconclusive but suggestive of linkage in the latter two regions, and it is concluded that multicenter follow-up linkage studies of complex disorders can help to direct research efforts toward promising regions.
Abstract: In response to reported schizophrenia linkage findings on chromosomes 3, 6 and 8, fourteen research groups genotyped 14 microsatellite markers in an unbiased, collaborative (New) sample of 403-567 informative pedigrees per marker, and in the Original sample which produced each finding (the Johns Hopkins University sample of 46-52 informative pedigrees for chromosomes 3 and 8, and the Medical College of Virginia sample of 156-191 informative pedigrees for chromosome 6). Primary planned analyses (New sample) were two-point heterogeneity lod score (lod2) tests (dominant and recessive affected-only models), and multipoint affected sibling pair (ASP) analysis, with a narrow diagnostic model (DSM-IIIR schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders). Regions with positive results were also analyzed in the Original and Combined samples. There was no evidence for linkage on chromosome 3. For chromosome 6, ASP maximum lod scores (MLS) were 2.19 (New sample, nominal p = 0.001) and 2.68 (Combined sample, p = .0004). For chromosome 8, maximum lod2 scores (tests of linkage with heterogeneity) were 2.22 (New sample, p = .0014) and 3.06 (Combined sample, p = .00018). Results are interpreted as inconclusive but suggestive of linkage in the latter two regions. We discuss possible reasons for failing to achieve a conclusive result in this large sample. Design issues and limitations of this type of collaborative study are discussed, and it is concluded that multicenter follow-up linkage studies of complex disorders can help to direct research efforts toward promising regions.

176 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results do not support the hypothesis that GluR6 allelic variants provide a major gene contribution to the etiology of schizophrenia in a large proportion of these pedigrees.
Abstract: Objective : Previous research has consistently implicated genetic factors in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. It has been hypothesized that an abnormality in glutamatergic function is of etiologic importance in schizophrenia, and therefore the glutamate receptor family of genes are potential susceptibility loci for schizophrenia. To test this hypothesis the authors sought to detect linkage between the GluR6 glutamate receptor gene and schizophrenia. Method : Twenty-three English and Icelandic families containing multiple cases of schizophrenia were genotyped with a microsatellite trinucleotide repeat polymorphism localized at the GluR6 glutamate receptor locus. Lod scores, model-free linkage analysis, and extended relative pair analysis were used to test for linkage. Results : No statistically significant evidence of linkage between GluR6 and schizophrenia was found. Conclusions : The results do not support the hypothesis that GluR6 allelic variants provide a major gene contribution to the etiology of schizophrenia in a large proportion of these pedigrees.

13 citations