Conference
Business Process Management
About: Business Process Management is an academic conference. The conference publishes majorly in the area(s): Business process & Business process management. Over the lifetime, 2103 publications have been published by the conference receiving 54238 citations.
Topics: Business process, Business process management, Business process modeling, Process modeling, Process mining
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
26 Jun 2003
TL;DR: The acronyms in this domain are tried to demystify, the state-of-the-art technology is described, and it is argued that BPM could benefit from formal methods/languages.
Abstract: Business Process Management (BPM) includes methods, techniques, and tools to support the design, enactment, management, and analysis of operational business processes. It can be considered as an extension of classical Workflow Management (WFM) systems and approaches. Although the practical relevance of BPM is undisputed, a clear definition of BPM and related acronyms such as BAM, BPA, and STP are missing. Moreover, a clear scientific foundation is missing. In this paper, we try to demystify the acronyms in this domain, describe the state-of-the-art technology, and argue that BPM could benefit from formal methods/languages (cf. Petri nets, process algebras, etc.).
1,480 citations
••
Eindhoven University of Technology1, Queensland University of Technology2, Capgemini3, University of Rome Tor Vergata4, Humboldt University of Berlin5, Software AG6, University of Padua7, Polytechnic University of Catalonia8, Hewlett-Packard9, Ghent University10, New Mexico State University11, IBM12, University of Milan13, University of Tartu14, University of Vienna15, Technical University of Lisbon16, Telecom SudParis17, Rabobank18, Infosys19, University of Calabria20, Fujitsu21, Pennsylvania State University22, University of Bari23, University of Bologna24, Vienna University of Economics and Business25, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano26, Stevens Institute of Technology27, Indian Council of Agricultural Research28, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile29, University of Haifa30, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology31, Cranfield University32, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven33, Deloitte34, Tsinghua University35, University of Innsbruck36, Hasso Plattner Institute37
TL;DR: This manifesto hopes to serve as a guide for software developers, scientists, consultants, business managers, and end-users to increase the maturity of process mining as a new tool to improve the design, control, and support of operational business processes.
Abstract: Process mining techniques are able to extract knowledge from event logs commonly available in today’s information systems. These techniques provide new means to discover, monitor, and improve processes in a variety of application domains. There are two main drivers for the growing interest in process mining. On the one hand, more and more events are being recorded, thus, providing detailed information about the history of processes. On the other hand, there is a need to improve and support business processes in competitive and rapidly changing environments. This manifesto is created by the IEEE Task Force on Process Mining and aims to promote the topic of process mining. Moreover, by defining a set of guiding principles and listing important challenges, this manifesto hopes to serve as a guide for software developers, scientists, consultants, business managers, and end-users. The goal is to increase the maturity of process mining as a new tool to improve the (re)design, control, and support of operational business processes.
1,135 citations
••
24 Sep 2007TL;DR: A new process mining approach is proposed that is configurable and allows for different faithfully simplifiedviews of a particular process, just like different roadmaps provide suitable abstractions of reality.
Abstract: Process Mining is a technique for extracting process models from executionlogs. This is particularly useful in situations where people have an idealizedview of reality. Real-life processes turn out to be less structured than peopletend to believe. Unfortunately, traditional process mining approaches haveproblems dealing with unstructured processes. The discovered models are often"spaghetti-like", showing all details without distinguishing what is important andwhat is not. This paper proposes a new process mining approach to overcome thisproblem. The approach is configurable and allows for different faithfully simplifiedviews of a particular process. To do this, the concept of a roadmap is used asa metaphor. Just like different roadmaps provide suitable abstractions of reality,process models should provide meaningful abstractions of operational processesencountered in domains ranging from healthcare and logistics to web servicesand public administration.
795 citations
••
04 Sep 2006TL;DR: This work proposes a fundamental paradigm shift for flexible process management and proposes the ConDec language for modelling and enacting dynamic business processes, based on temporal logic rather than some imperative process modelling language.
Abstract: Management of dynamic processes in an important issue in rapidly changing organizations. Workflow management systems are systems that use detailed process models to drive the business processes. Current business process modelling languages and models are of imperative nature – they strictly prescribe how to work. Systems that allow users to maneuver within the process model or even change the model while working are considered to be the most suitable for dynamic processes management. However, in many companies it is not realistic to expect that end-users are able to change their processes. Moreover, the imperative nature of these languages forces designer to over-specify processes, which results in frequent changes. We propose a fundamental paradigm shift for flexible process management and propose a more declarative approach. Declarative models specify what should be done without specifying how it should be done. We propose the ConDec language for modelling and enacting dynamic business processes. ConDec is based on temporal logic rather than some imperative process modelling language.
566 citations
••
01 Jan 2000TL;DR: The Guidelines of Modeling (GoM)1, a framework to structure factors for the evaluation of process models, is presented and six general techniques for adjusting models to the perspectives of different types of user and purposes will be explained.
Abstract: Process modeling becomes more and more an important task not only for the purpose of software engineering, but also for many other purposes besides the development of software. Therefore it is necessary to evaluate the quality of process models from different viewpoints. This is even more important as the increasing number of different end users, different purposes and the availability of different modeling techniques and modeling tools leads to a higher complexity of information models. In this paper the Guidelines of Modeling (GoM)1, a framework to structure factors for the evaluation of process models, is presented. Exemplary, Guidelines of Modeling for workflow management and simulation are presented. Moreover, six general techniques for adjusting models to the perspectives of different types of user and purposes will be explained.
533 citations