scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Conference

Business Process Management 

About: Business Process Management is an academic conference. The conference publishes majorly in the area(s): Business process & Business process management. Over the lifetime, 2103 publications have been published by the conference receiving 54238 citations.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
26 Jun 2003
TL;DR: The acronyms in this domain are tried to demystify, the state-of-the-art technology is described, and it is argued that BPM could benefit from formal methods/languages.
Abstract: Business Process Management (BPM) includes methods, techniques, and tools to support the design, enactment, management, and analysis of operational business processes. It can be considered as an extension of classical Workflow Management (WFM) systems and approaches. Although the practical relevance of BPM is undisputed, a clear definition of BPM and related acronyms such as BAM, BPA, and STP are missing. Moreover, a clear scientific foundation is missing. In this paper, we try to demystify the acronyms in this domain, describe the state-of-the-art technology, and argue that BPM could benefit from formal methods/languages (cf. Petri nets, process algebras, etc.).

1,480 citations

Book ChapterDOI
Wil M. P. van der Aalst1, Wil M. P. van der Aalst2, A Arya Adriansyah1, Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros3, Franco Arcieri4, Thomas Baier5, Tobias Blickle6, Jagadeesh Chandra Bose1, Peter van den Brand, Ronald Brandtjen, Joos C. A. M. Buijs1, Andrea Burattin7, Josep Carmona8, Malu Castellanos9, Jan Claes10, Jonathan Cook11, Nicola Costantini, Francisco Curbera12, Ernesto Damiani13, Massimiliano de Leoni1, Pavlos Delias, Boudewijn F. van Dongen1, Marlon Dumas14, Schahram Dustdar15, Dirk Fahland1, Diogo R. Ferreira16, Walid Gaaloul17, Frank van Geffen18, Sukriti Goel19, CW Christian Günther, Antonella Guzzo20, Paul Harmon, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede2, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede1, John Hoogland, Jon Espen Ingvaldsen, Koki Kato21, Rudolf Kuhn, Akhil Kumar22, Marcello La Rosa2, Fabrizio Maria Maggi1, Donato Malerba23, RS Ronny Mans1, Alberto Manuel, Martin McCreesh, Paola Mello24, Jan Mendling25, Marco Montali26, Hamid Reza Motahari-Nezhad9, Michael zur Muehlen27, Jorge Munoz-Gama8, Luigi Pontieri28, Joel Ribeiro1, A Anne Rozinat, Hugo Seguel Pérez, Ricardo Seguel Pérez, Marcos Sepúlveda29, Jim Sinur, Pnina Soffer30, Minseok Song31, Alessandro Sperduti7, Giovanni Stilo4, Casper Stoel, Keith D. Swenson21, Maurizio Talamo4, Wei Tan12, Christopher Turner32, Jan Vanthienen33, George Varvaressos, Eric Verbeek1, Marc Verdonk34, Roberto Vigo, Jianmin Wang35, Barbara Weber36, Matthias Weidlich37, Ton Weijters1, Lijie Wen35, Michael Westergaard1, Moe Thandar Wynn2 
01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: This manifesto hopes to serve as a guide for software developers, scientists, consultants, business managers, and end-users to increase the maturity of process mining as a new tool to improve the design, control, and support of operational business processes.
Abstract: Process mining techniques are able to extract knowledge from event logs commonly available in today’s information systems. These techniques provide new means to discover, monitor, and improve processes in a variety of application domains. There are two main drivers for the growing interest in process mining. On the one hand, more and more events are being recorded, thus, providing detailed information about the history of processes. On the other hand, there is a need to improve and support business processes in competitive and rapidly changing environments. This manifesto is created by the IEEE Task Force on Process Mining and aims to promote the topic of process mining. Moreover, by defining a set of guiding principles and listing important challenges, this manifesto hopes to serve as a guide for software developers, scientists, consultants, business managers, and end-users. The goal is to increase the maturity of process mining as a new tool to improve the (re)design, control, and support of operational business processes.

1,135 citations

Book ChapterDOI
24 Sep 2007
TL;DR: A new process mining approach is proposed that is configurable and allows for different faithfully simplifiedviews of a particular process, just like different roadmaps provide suitable abstractions of reality.
Abstract: Process Mining is a technique for extracting process models from executionlogs. This is particularly useful in situations where people have an idealizedview of reality. Real-life processes turn out to be less structured than peopletend to believe. Unfortunately, traditional process mining approaches haveproblems dealing with unstructured processes. The discovered models are often"spaghetti-like", showing all details without distinguishing what is important andwhat is not. This paper proposes a new process mining approach to overcome thisproblem. The approach is configurable and allows for different faithfully simplifiedviews of a particular process. To do this, the concept of a roadmap is used asa metaphor. Just like different roadmaps provide suitable abstractions of reality,process models should provide meaningful abstractions of operational processesencountered in domains ranging from healthcare and logistics to web servicesand public administration.

795 citations

Book ChapterDOI
04 Sep 2006
TL;DR: This work proposes a fundamental paradigm shift for flexible process management and proposes the ConDec language for modelling and enacting dynamic business processes, based on temporal logic rather than some imperative process modelling language.
Abstract: Management of dynamic processes in an important issue in rapidly changing organizations. Workflow management systems are systems that use detailed process models to drive the business processes. Current business process modelling languages and models are of imperative nature – they strictly prescribe how to work. Systems that allow users to maneuver within the process model or even change the model while working are considered to be the most suitable for dynamic processes management. However, in many companies it is not realistic to expect that end-users are able to change their processes. Moreover, the imperative nature of these languages forces designer to over-specify processes, which results in frequent changes. We propose a fundamental paradigm shift for flexible process management and propose a more declarative approach. Declarative models specify what should be done without specifying how it should be done. We propose the ConDec language for modelling and enacting dynamic business processes. ConDec is based on temporal logic rather than some imperative process modelling language.

566 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: The Guidelines of Modeling (GoM)1, a framework to structure factors for the evaluation of process models, is presented and six general techniques for adjusting models to the perspectives of different types of user and purposes will be explained.
Abstract: Process modeling becomes more and more an important task not only for the purpose of software engineering, but also for many other purposes besides the development of software. Therefore it is necessary to evaluate the quality of process models from different viewpoints. This is even more important as the increasing number of different end users, different purposes and the availability of different modeling techniques and modeling tools leads to a higher complexity of information models. In this paper the Guidelines of Modeling (GoM)1, a framework to structure factors for the evaluation of process models, is presented. Exemplary, Guidelines of Modeling for workflow management and simulation are presented. Moreover, six general techniques for adjusting models to the perspectives of different types of user and purposes will be explained.

533 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Conference in previous years
YearPapers
202157
2020110
2019147
2018148
2017113
2016111