Institution
Boca Raton Regional Hospital
Healthcare•Boca Raton, Florida, United States•
About: Boca Raton Regional Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in Boca Raton, Florida, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Medicine & Cancer. The organization has 128 authors who have published 184 publications receiving 4147 citations. The organization is also known as: Boca Raton Community Hospital.
Topics: Medicine, Cancer, Brachytherapy, Aneurysm, Lung cancer
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: A door‐to‐intervention time of <90 minutes is suggested, based on a framework of 30‐30‐30 minutes, for the management of the patient with a ruptured aneurysm, and the Vascular Quality Initiative mortality risk score is suggested for mutual decision‐making with patients considering aneurYSm repair.
1,542 citations
••
TL;DR: A case of a 74-year-old patient who traveled from Europe to the United States and presented with encephalopathy and COVID-19 is reported, indicating a pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019.
Abstract: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic. Neurological complications of COVID-19 have not been reported. Encephalopathy has not been described as a presenting symptom or complication of COVID-19. We report a case of a 74-year-old patient who traveled from Europe to the United States and presented with encephalopathy and COVID-19.
496 citations
••
TL;DR: Radiologists improved their cancer detection at mammography when using an artificial intelligence system for support, without requiring additional reading time.
Abstract: Purpose To compare breast cancer detection performance of radiologists reading mammographic examinations unaided versus supported by an artificial intelligence (AI) system. Materials and Methods An enriched retrospective, fully crossed, multireader, multicase, HIPAA-compliant study was performed. Screening digital mammographic examinations from 240 women (median age, 62 years; range, 39-89 years) performed between 2013 and 2017 were included. The 240 examinations (100 showing cancers, 40 leading to false-positive recalls, 100 normal) were interpreted by 14 Mammography Quality Standards Act-qualified radiologists, once with and once without AI support. The readers provided a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System score and probability of malignancy. AI support provided radiologists with interactive decision support (clicking on a breast region yields a local cancer likelihood score), traditional lesion markers for computer-detected abnormalities, and an examination-based cancer likelihood score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity, and reading time were compared between conditions by using mixed-models analysis dof variance and generalized linear models for multiple repeated measurements. Results On average, the AUC was higher with AI support than with unaided reading (0.89 vs 0.87, respectively; P = .002). Sensitivity increased with AI support (86% [86 of 100] vs 83% [83 of 100]; P = .046), whereas specificity trended toward improvement (79% [111 of 140]) vs 77% [108 of 140]; P = .06). Reading time per case was similar (unaided, 146 seconds; supported by AI, 149 seconds; P = .15). The AUC with the AI system alone was similar to the average AUC of the radiologists (0.89 vs 0.87). Conclusion Radiologists improved their cancer detection at mammography when using an artificial intelligence system for support, without requiring additional reading time. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. See also the editorial by Bahl in this issue.
320 citations
••
University of São Paulo1, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children2, Robarts Research Institute3, University of Pennsylvania4, University of New South Wales5, University of Western Australia6, Boca Raton Regional Hospital7, University of Milan8, University of Amsterdam9, Masaryk University10, McGill University11, University College London12, University of Kansas13, University of the Witwatersrand14, Sultan Qaboos University15, Imperial College London16, Erasmus University Rotterdam17, Osaka University18
TL;DR: This Review aims to define a phenotype for severe familial hypercholesterolaemia and identify people at highest risk for cardiovascular disease, based on the concentration of LDL cholesterol in blood and individuals' responsiveness to conventional lipid-lowering treatment.
305 citations
••
TL;DR: Addition of AB US to screening mammography in a generalizable cohort of women with dense breasts increased the cancer detection yield of clinically important cancers, but it also increased the number of false-positive results.
Abstract: The results of this study indicated that there is an increase in cancer detection with use of automated breast US supplemented to mammography among women with dense breasts, producing detection of an additional 1.9 cancers, most of which were clinically important, per 1000 women screened at the cost of a higher recall rate.
267 citations
Authors
Showing all 130 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
W. Anthony Lee | 41 | 89 | 6060 |
Alexander Kulik | 30 | 86 | 3057 |
David G. Forcione | 29 | 79 | 4609 |
Frank D. Vrionis | 28 | 107 | 4159 |
Nihar R. Desai | 26 | 215 | 3399 |
Carola M. Zalles | 21 | 46 | 1311 |
Anna Witkowska | 20 | 86 | 1562 |
James R. Ross | 20 | 43 | 1461 |
Edgardo S. Santos | 19 | 93 | 979 |
Seth J. Baum | 19 | 69 | 1946 |
Robert Levy | 19 | 28 | 1143 |
Heather M. Johnson | 17 | 44 | 1140 |
Kathy Schilling | 16 | 40 | 2061 |
Brian Snelling | 16 | 46 | 916 |
John Strasswimmer | 15 | 46 | 2627 |