CABI

About: CABI is a nonprofit organization based out in Wallingford, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Introduced species. The organization has 789 authors who have published 1759 publications receiving 73843 citations. The organization is also known as: Centre for Biosciences and Agriculture International.

Molecular Characterization of Tomato and Chili Leaf Curl Begomoviruses from Pakistan.

Abstract: Leaf curl or yellowing symptoms, typical of those caused by begomovirus infection, are commonly observed in chili (Capsicum annuum) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plantings in Pakistan. One chili sample with leaf curl symptoms was collected in 1998 in Multan (Punjab Province), and two tomato samples with leaf curl and yellowing symptoms were collected from Islamabad and Dargai (North West Frontier Province) in 2000 and 2001, respectively. Virus DNA was first amplified by polymerase chain reaction using the degenerate primer pair PAL1v1978/PAR1c715 (3). The expected 1.4-kb PCR products were obtained from the three samples. Based on the sequences of the 1.4-kb DNA products, specific primers were designed to complete each of the DNA-A sequences. Two primer pairs, DNABLC1/DNABLV2 and DNABLC2/DNABLV2, were used for the detection of DNA-B (2). The genome of the tomato leaf curl isolate from Islamabad contained a DNA-A of 2,739 nucleotides (GenBank Accession No. AF448059), a DNA-B of 2,728 nucleotides (GenBank Accession No. AY150304), and had 94% nucleotide identity in the common region. The genome of the tomato leaf curl isolate from Dargai contained a DNA-A of 2,740 nucleotides (GenBank Accession No. AF448058), a DNA-B of 2,686 nucleotides (GenBank Accession No. AY150305), and had 96% nucleotide identity in the common region. Each of the tomato isolates contained eight predicted open-reading frames (ORFs) (AV1, AV2, AV3, AC1, AC2, AC3, AC4, and AC5) in the DNA-A and two predicted ORFs (BV1 and BC1) in the DNA-B. The DNA-A nucleotide sequence identity of the Islamabad isolate and Dargai tomato isolate is 96% and that of DNA-B is 88%. Sequence comparisons with begomovirus sequences available in the GenBank sequence database showed that these two tomato virus isolates had the highest sequence identity with Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus-Severe (GenBank Accession No. U15015) from northern India (more than 95% for DNA-A and less than 90% for DNA-B). The DNA-A of the virus associated with chili leaf curl from Pakistan (GenBank Accession No. AF336806) consists of 2,754 nucleotides, containing six predicted ORFs (AV1, AV2, AC1, AC2, AC3, and AC4). The chili virus was unrelated to the two tomato begomovirus isolates from Pakistan, with which it shares less than 75% nucleotide identity. Sequence comparisons show highest sequence identity (87%) with Tomato leaf curl Bangladesh virus (GenBank Accession No. AF188481). DNA-beta of 1.3 kb was detected in the chili begomovirus isolate using Beta01/Beta02 primers (1). There was no evidence for the presence of a DNA-B in the chili begomovirus isolate when tested by the two DNA-B specific primer pairs. Based on DNA sequence comparisons, the chili leaf curl virus from Pakistan, to our knowledge, constitutes a distinct, new monopartite begomovirus. References: (1) R. W. Briddon et al. Mol. Biotechnol. 20:315, 2002. (2) S. K. Green et al. Plant Dis. 85:1286, 2001. (3) M. R. Rojas et al. Plant Dis. 77:340, 1993.

Explanation of the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing and its implication for microbiology.

Abstract: Working with genetic resources and associated data requires greater attention since the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) came into force in October 2014. Biologists must ensure that they have legal clarity in how they can and cannot use the genetic resources on which they carry out research. Not only must they work within the spirit in the Convention on Biological Diversity (https://www.cbd.int/convention/articles/default.shtml?a=cbd-02) but also they may have regulatory requirements to meet. Although the Nagoya Protocol was negotiated and agreed globally, it is the responsibility of each country that ratifies it to introduce their individual implementing procedures and practices. Many countries in Europe, such as the UK, have chosen not to put access controls in place at this time, but others already have laws enacted providing ABS measures under the Convention on Biological Diversity or specifically to implement the Nagoya Protocol. Access legislation is in place in many countries and information on this can be found at the ABS Clearing House (https://absch.cbd.int/). For example, Brazil, although not a Party to the Nagoya Protocol at the time of writing, has Law 13.123 which entered into force on 17 November 2015, regulated by Decree 8.772 which was published on 11 May 2016. In this case, export of Brazilian genetic resources is not allowed unless the collector is registered in the National System for Genetic Heritage and Associated Traditional Knowledge Management (SisGen). The process entails that a foreign scientist must first of all be registered working with someone in Brazil and have authorization to collect. The enactment of European Union Regulation po. 511/2014 implements Nagoya Protocol elements that govern compliance measures for users and offers the opportunity to demonstrate due diligence in sourcing their organisms by selecting from holdings of ‘registered collections’. The UK has introduced a Statutory Instrument that puts in place enforcement measures within the UK to implement this European Union Regulation; this is regulated by Regulatory Delivery, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategies. Scientific communities, including the private sector, individual institutions and organizations, have begun to design policy and best practices for compliance. Microbiologists and culture collections alike need to be aware of the legislation of the source country of the materials they use and put in place best practices for compliance; such best practice has been drafted by the Microbial Resource Research Infrastructure, and other research communities such as the Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities, the Global Genome Biodiversity Network and the International Organisation for Biological Control have published best practice and/or codes of conduct to ensure legitimate exchange and use of genetic resources.