scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

CABI

NonprofitWallingford, United Kingdom
About: CABI is a nonprofit organization based out in Wallingford, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Introduced species. The organization has 789 authors who have published 1759 publications receiving 73843 citations. The organization is also known as: Centre for Biosciences and Agriculture International.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A framework is proposed to facilitate the comparative analysis of invasion pathways by a wide range of taxa in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and helps identify existing gaps in current knowledge of pathways and highlight the limitations of existing legislation to manage introductions of alien species.
Abstract: Summary 1. Pathways describe the processes that result in the introduction of alien species from one location to another. A framework is proposed to facilitate the comparative analysis of invasion pathways by a wide range of taxa in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Comparisons with a range of data helped identify existing gaps in current knowledge of pathways and highlight the limitations of existing legislation to manage introductions of alien species. The scheme aims for universality but uses the European Union as a case study for the regulatory perspectives. 2. Alien species may arrive and enter a new region through three broad mechanisms: importation of a commodity, arrival of a transport vector, and/or natural spread from a neighbouring region where the species is itself alien. These three mechanisms result in six principal pathways: release, escape, contaminant, stowaway, corridor and unaided. 3. Alien species transported as commodities may be introduced as a deliberate release or as an escape from captivity. Many species are not intentionally transported but arrive as a contaminant of a commodity, for example pathogens and pests. Stowaways are directly associated with human transport but arrive independently of a specific commodity, for example organisms transported in ballast water, cargo and airfreight. The corridor pathway highlights the role transport infrastructures play in the introduction of alien species. The unaided pathway describes situations where natural spread results in alien species arriving into a new region from a donor region where it is also alien. 4. Vertebrate pathways tend to be characterized as deliberate releases, invertebrates as contaminants and plants as escapes. Pathogenic micro-organisms and fungi are generally introduced as contaminants of their hosts. The corridor and unaided pathways are often ignored in pathway assessments but warrant further detailed consideration. 5. Synthesis and applications. Intentional releases and escapes should be straightforward to monitor and regulate but, in practice, developing legislation has proved difficult. New introductions continue to occur through contaminant, stowaway, corridor and unaided pathways. These pathways represent special challenges for management and legislation. The present framework should enable these trends to be monitored more clearly and hopefully lead to the development of appropriate regulations or codes of practice to stem the number of future introductions.

867 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ward Appeltans1, Shane T. Ahyong2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Gary L. Anderson4, Martin V. Angel5, Tom Artois6, Nicolas Bailly7, Roger N. Bamber, Anthony Barber, Ilse Bartsch8, Annalisa Berta9, Magdalena Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, Phil Bock10, Geoff A. Boxshall11, Christopher B. Boyko12, Simone N. Brandão13, R. A. Bray11, Niel L. Bruce14, Niel L. Bruce15, Stephen D. Cairns16, Tin-Yam Chan17, Lanna Cheng18, Allen Gilbert Collins19, Thomas H. Cribb20, Marco Curini-Galletti21, Farid Dahdouh-Guebas22, Farid Dahdouh-Guebas23, Peter J. F. Davie24, Michael N Dawson25, Olivier De Clerck26, Wim Decock1, Sammy De Grave8, Nicole J. de Voogd27, Daryl P. Domning28, Christian C. Emig, Christer Erséus29, William N. Eschmeyer30, William N. Eschmeyer31, Kristian Fauchald16, Daphne G. Fautin8, Stephen W. Feist32, Charles H. J. M. Fransen27, Hidetaka Furuya33, Óscar García-Álvarez34, Sarah Gerken35, David I. Gibson11, Arjan Gittenberger27, Serge Gofas36, Liza Gómez-Daglio25, Dennis P. Gordon37, Michael D. Guiry38, Francisco Hernandez1, Bert W. Hoeksema27, Russell R. Hopcroft39, Damià Jaume40, Paul M. Kirk41, Nico Koedam23, Stefan Koenemann42, Jürgen B. Kolb43, Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen44, Andreas Kroh45, Gretchen Lambert46, David Lazarus47, Rafael Lemaitre16, Matt Longshaw32, Jim Lowry2, Enrique Macpherson40, Laurence P. Madin48, Christopher L. Mah16, Gill Mapstone11, Patsy A. McLaughlin49, Jan Mees1, Jan Mees26, Kenneth Meland50, Charles G. Messing51, Claudia E. Mills46, Tina N. Molodtsova52, Rich Mooi30, Birger Neuhaus47, Peter K. L. Ng53, Claus Nielsen44, Jon L. Norenburg16, Dennis M. Opresko16, Masayuki Osawa54, Gustav Paulay31, William F. Perrin19, John F. Pilger55, Gary C. B. Poore10, P.R. Pugh5, Geoffrey B. Read37, James Davis Reimer56, Marc Rius57, Rosana M. Rocha58, J.I. Saiz-Salinas59, Victor Scarabino, Bernd Schierwater60, Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa13, Kareen E. Schnabel37, Marilyn Schotte16, Peter Schuchert, Enrico Schwabe, Hendrik Segers61, Caryn Self-Sullivan51, Noa Shenkar62, Volker Siegel, Wolfgang Sterrer8, Sabine Stöhr63, Billie J. Swalla46, Mark L. Tasker64, Erik V. Thuesen65, Tarmo Timm66, M. Antonio Todaro, Xavier Turon40, Seth Tyler67, Peter Uetz68, Jacob van der Land27, Bart Vanhoorne1, Leen van Ofwegen27, Rob W. M. Van Soest27, Jan Vanaverbeke26, Genefor Walker-Smith10, T. Chad Walter16, Alan Warren11, Gary C. Williams30, Simon P. Wilson69, Mark J. Costello70 
Flanders Marine Institute1, Australian Museum2, University of New South Wales3, University of Southern Mississippi4, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton5, University of Hasselt6, WorldFish7, American Museum of Natural History8, San Diego State University9, Museum Victoria10, Natural History Museum11, Dowling College12, University of Hamburg13, University of Johannesburg14, James Cook University15, National Museum of Natural History16, National Taiwan Ocean University17, Scripps Institution of Oceanography18, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration19, University of Queensland20, University of Sassari21, Université libre de Bruxelles22, Vrije Universiteit Brussel23, Queensland Museum24, University of California, Merced25, Ghent University26, Naturalis27, Howard University28, University of Gothenburg29, California Academy of Sciences30, Florida Museum of Natural History31, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science32, Osaka University33, University of Santiago de Compostela34, University of Alaska Anchorage35, University of Málaga36, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research37, National University of Ireland, Galway38, University of Alaska Fairbanks39, Spanish National Research Council40, CABI41, University of Siegen42, Massey University43, University of Copenhagen44, Naturhistorisches Museum45, University of Washington46, Museum für Naturkunde47, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution48, Western Washington University49, University of Bergen50, Nova Southeastern University51, Shirshov Institute of Oceanology52, National University of Singapore53, Shimane University54, Agnes Scott College55, University of the Ryukyus56, University of California, Davis57, Federal University of Paraná58, University of the Basque Country59, University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover60, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences61, Tel Aviv University62, Swedish Museum of Natural History63, Joint Nature Conservation Committee64, The Evergreen State College65, Estonian University of Life Sciences66, University of Maine67, Virginia Commonwealth University68, Trinity College, Dublin69, University of Auckland70
TL;DR: The first register of the marine species of the world is compiled and it is estimated that between one-third and two-thirds of marine species may be undescribed, and previous estimates of there being well over one million marine species appear highly unlikely.

822 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is now a need to improve understanding of how grassland management affects bird population dynamics, and the interaction between predation rates and management-related changes in habitat is particularly important.
Abstract: Summary 1The effects of agricultural intensification on biodiversity in arable systems of western Europe have received a great deal of attention. However, the recent transformation of grassland systems has been just as profound. 2In Britain, the management of grassland has changed substantially in the second half of the 20th century. A high proportion of lowland grassland is managed intensively. The major changes include a doubling in the use of inorganic nitrogen, a switch from hay to silage, and increased stocking densities, particularly of sheep. Structurally diverse and species-rich swards have been largely replaced by relatively dense, fast-growing and structurally uniform swards, dominated by competitive species. 3Most of these changes have reduced the suitability of grassland as feeding and breeding habitat for birds. 4The most important direct effects have been deterioration of the sward as nesting and wintering habitat, and loss of seed resources as food. Short uniform swards afford poor shelter and camouflage from predators, whereas increased mowing intensities and trampling by stock will destroy nests and young. Increased frequency of sward defoliation reduces flowering and seed set, and hence food availability for seed-eating birds. 5The indirect effects of intensification of management on birds relate largely to changes in the abundance and availability of invertebrate prey. The effects of management vary with its type, timing and intensity, and with invertebrate ecology and phenology, but, in general, the abundance and diversity of invertebrates declines with reductions in sward diversity and structural complexity. 6Low input livestock systems are likely to be central to any future management strategies designed to maintain and restore the ecological diversity of semi-natural lowland grasslands. Low additions of organic fertilizer benefit some invertebrate prey species, and moderate levels of grazing encourage sward heterogeneity. 7There is now a need to improve understanding of how grassland management affects bird population dynamics. Particularly important areas of research include: (i) the interaction between changes in food abundance, due to changes in fertilizer inputs, and food accessibility, due to changes in sward structure; (ii) the interaction between predation rates and management-related changes in habitat; and (iii) the impact of alternative anti-helminithic treatments for livestock on invertebrates and birds.

734 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A definition of microbiome is proposed based on the compact, clear, and comprehensive description of the term provided by Whipps et al. in 1988, amended with a set of novel recommendations considering the latest technological developments and research findings.
Abstract: The field of microbiome research has evolved rapidly over the past few decades and has become a topic of great scientific and public interest. As a result of this rapid growth in interest covering different fields, we are lacking a clear commonly agreed definition of the term “microbiome.” Moreover, a consensus on best practices in microbiome research is missing. Recently, a panel of international experts discussed the current gaps in the frame of the European-funded MicrobiomeSupport project. The meeting brought together about 40 leaders from diverse microbiome areas, while more than a hundred experts from all over the world took part in an online survey accompanying the workshop. This article excerpts the outcomes of the workshop and the corresponding online survey embedded in a short historical introduction and future outlook. We propose a definition of microbiome based on the compact, clear, and comprehensive description of the term provided by Whipps et al. in 1988, amended with a set of novel recommendations considering the latest technological developments and research findings. We clearly separate the terms microbiome and microbiota and provide a comprehensive discussion considering the composition of microbiota, the heterogeneity and dynamics of microbiomes in time and space, the stability and resilience of microbial networks, the definition of core microbiomes, and functionally relevant keystone species as well as co-evolutionary principles of microbe-host and inter-species interactions within the microbiome. These broad definitions together with the suggested unifying concepts will help to improve standardization of microbiome studies in the future, and could be the starting point for an integrated assessment of data resulting in a more rapid transfer of knowledge from basic science into practice. Furthermore, microbiome standards are important for solving new challenges associated with anthropogenic-driven changes in the field of planetary health, for which the understanding of microbiomes might play a key role.

733 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The effects caused by different insect invaders are reviewed according to their ecosystem roles, i.e. herbivores, predators, parasites, parasitoids and pollinators; the level of biological organisation at which they occur; and the direct and indirect mechanisms underlying these effects.
Abstract: A literature survey identified 403 primary research publications that investigated the ecological effects of invasive alien insects and/or the mechanisms underlying these effects. The majority of these studies were published in the last 8 years and nearly two-thirds were carried out in North America. These publications concerned 72 invasive insect species, of which two ant species, Solenopsis invicta and Linepithema humile, accounted for 18% and 14% of the studies, respectively. Most publications investigated effects on native biodiversity at population or community level. Genetic effects and, to a lesser extent, effects on ecosystem services and processes were rarely explored. We review the effects caused by different insect invaders according to: their ecosystem roles, i.e. herbivores, predators, parasites, parasitoids and pollinators; the level of biological organisation at which they occur; and the direct and indirect mechanisms underlying these effects. The best documented effects occur in invasive ants, Eurasian forest herbivores invasive in North America, and honeybees. Impacts may occur through simple trophic interactions such as herbivory, predation or parasitism. Alien species may also affect native species and communities through more complex mechanisms such as competition for resources, disease transmission, apparent competition, or pollination disruption, among others. Finally, some invasive insects, particularly forest herbivores and ants, are known to affect ecosystem processes through cascading effects. We identify biases and gaps in our knowledge of ecological effects of invasive insects and suggest further opportunities for research.

648 citations


Authors

Showing all 791 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Lynn E. DeLisi8436526860
David L. Hawksworth7147628827
Matthew B. Thomas6723315920
Alexander N. Hristov571959466
Yves Basset5516410317
H. C. J. Godfray5411510682
Donald L. J. Quicke502657977
Yan Sun452928689
Marc Kenis441859882
Julian Wiseman441667859
Caroline Müller422127005
Valerie K. Brown42759032
Paul M. Kirk4212318992
Nicholas J. Mills411624739
Harry C. Evans4115210941
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Rothamsted Research
5.6K papers, 321.2K citations

89% related

Agricultural Research Service
58.6K papers, 2.1M citations

86% related

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
21.3K papers, 748.1K citations

86% related

University of Hohenheim
16.4K papers, 567.3K citations

84% related

Institut national de la recherche agronomique
68.3K papers, 3.2M citations

84% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20232
20225
2021127
2020126
2019109
2018112