Institution
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Education•Moscow, Russia•
About: I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University is a education organization based out in Moscow, Russia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Medicine & Population. The organization has 7984 authors who have published 9355 publications receiving 68997 citations.
Topics: Medicine, Population, Cancer, Disease, Blood pressure
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was well tolerated and achieved a similarly high SVR12 rate versus the 12-week regimen in treatment-naïve patients with chronic HCV GT1-6 infection and compensated cirrhosis, and the availability of an 8-week DAA regimen may simplify the care of these patients.
97 citations
••
TL;DR: The histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes, a class of epigenetic regulators, are historically well established as attractive therapeutic targets as mentioned in this paper and have been identified as a promising therapeutic target.
Abstract: The histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes, a class of epigenetic regulators, are historically well established as attractive therapeutic targets. During investigation of trends within clinical trials, we have identified a high number of clinical trials involving HDAC inhibitors, prompting us to further evaluate the current status of this class of therapeutic agents. In total, we have identified 32 agents with HDAC-inhibiting properties, of which 29 were found to interact with the HDAC enzymes as their primary therapeutic target. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical drug development highlighting the recent advances and provide analysis of specific trials and, where applicable, chemical structures. We found haematologic neoplasms continue to represent the majority of clinical indications for this class of drugs; however, it is clear that there is an ongoing trend towards diversification. Therapies for non-oncology indications including HIV infection, muscular dystrophies, inflammatory diseases as well as neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia and Friedreich's ataxia are achieving promising clinical progress. Combinatory regimens are proving to be useful to improve responsiveness among FDA-approved agents; however, it often results in increased treatment-related toxicities. This analysis suggests that the indication field is broadening through a high number of clinical trials while several fields of preclinical development are also promising.
97 citations
••
Karolinska University Hospital1, University of Amsterdam2, Sapienza University of Rome3, Aalborg University4, Charité5, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University6, John Radcliffe Hospital7, Odense University Hospital8, University of Giessen9, University of Verona10, Donetsk National Medical University11, Marmara University12, Heidelberg University13, Saarland University14, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University15, University of Pécs16, University of Paris17, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg18, Aix-Marseille University19, Albert Schweitzer Hospital20, University of Oslo21, Beaujon Hospital22, Technische Universität München23
TL;DR: Treatment with glucocorticoids should be weight-based and initiated at a dose of 0.6–0.8 mg/kg body weight/day orally for 1 month to induce remission and then be tapered within two additional months.
Abstract: The overall objective of these guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related digestive disease in adults and children. IgG4-related digestive disease can be diagnosed only with a comprehensive work-up that includes histology, organ morphology at imaging, serology, search for other organ involvement, and response to glucocorticoid treatment. Indications for treatment are symptomatic patients with obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, posterior pancreatic pain, and involvement of extra-pancreatic digestive organs, including IgG4-related cholangitis. Treatment with glucocorticoids should be weight-based and initiated at a dose of 0.6-0.8 mg/kg body weight/day orally (typical starting dose 30-40 mg/day prednisone equivalent) for 1 month to induce remission and then be tapered within two additional months. Response to initial treatment should be assessed at week 2-4 with clinical, biochemical and morphological markers. Maintenance treatment with glucocorticoids should be considered in multi-organ disease or history of relapse. If there is no change in disease activity and burden within 3 months, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. If the disease relapsed during the 3 months of treatment, immunosuppressive drugs should be added.
96 citations
••
TL;DR: The etiology and cellular mechanisms associated with endometriosis as well as the current diagnostic tools and therapies are reviewed, and the more recent genomic and proteomic studies are discussed and how these data may guide development of novel diagnostics and therapeutics.
Abstract: Endometriosis is a common and painful condition affecting women of reproductive age. While the underlying pathophysiology is still largely unknown, much advancement has been made in understanding the progression of the disease. In recent years, a great deal of research has focused on non-invasive diagnostic tools, such as biomarkers, as well as identification of potential therapeutic targets. In this article, we will review the etiology and cellular mechanisms associated with endometriosis as well as the current diagnostic tools and therapies. We will then discuss the more recent genomic and proteomic studies and how these data may guide development of novel diagnostics and therapeutics. The current diagnostic tools are invasive and current therapies primarily treat the symptoms of endometriosis. Optimally, the advancement of “-omic” data will facilitate the development of non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers as well as therapeutics that target the pathophysiology of the disease and halt, or even reverse, progression. However, the amount of data generated by these types of studies is vast and bioinformatics analysis, such as we present here, will be critical to identification of appropriate targets for further study.
96 citations
••
TL;DR: Current edition of the “Standards” emphasizes the patient-oriented approach in making decisions on therapeutic goals, such as levels of glycaemia and blood pressure, and features updated guidelines on the management of Type 2 DM and its vascular complications.
Abstract: Dear Colleagues! We are glad to present the 8th Edition of Standards of Diabetes Care. These evidence-based guidelines were designed to standardize and facilitate diabetes care in all regions of the Russian Federation. The Standards are updated on the regular basis to incorporate new data and relevant recommendations from national and international clinical societies, including World Health Organization Guidelines (WHO, 2011, 2013), International Diabetes Federation (IDF, 2011, 2012, 2013), American Diabetes Association (ADA, 2012, 2017), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE, 2017), International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD, 2014) and Russian Association of Endocrinologists (RAE, 2011, 2012, 2015). Current edition of the “Standards” also integrates results of completed randomized clinical trials (ADVANCE, ACCORD, VADT, UKPDS, SAVOR, TECOS, LEADER, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, etc.), as well as findings from the national studies of diabetes mellitus (DM), conducted in close partnership with a number of Russian hospitals. Latest data indicates that prevalence of DM in the world increased during the last decade more than two-fold, reaching some 415 million patients by the end of 2015. According to the current estimation by the International Diabetes Federation, 642 million patients will be suffering from DM by 2040. These observations resulted in the UN Resolution on Diabetes 61/225 passed on 20.12.2006, and in 2011 - UN Political Declaration, addressed to national health systems, calling for the establishment of multidisciplinary strategy in the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases, where special attention is drawn to the problem of diabetes as one of the leading causes of disability and mortality. Like many other countries, Russian Federation experiences a sharp rise in the prevalence of DM. According to Russian Federal Diabetes Register, there are at least 4.35 million patients with DM in this country by the end of 2016 (3% of population) with 92% (4 million) – Type 2 DM, 6% (255 th) – Type 1 DM and 2% (75 th) – other types of DM. However, these results underestimates real quantity of patients, because they consider only registered cases. Results of Russian epidemiological study (NATION) confirmed that only 50% of Type 2 DM are diagnosed. So real prevalence of patients with DM in Russia is no less than 8-9 million patients (about 6% of population). This is a great long-term problem, because a lot of patients are not diagnosed, so they don’t receive any treatment ant have high risk of vascular complications. Severe consequences of the global pandemics of DM include its vascular complications: nephropathy, retinopathy, coronary, cerebral, coronary and peripheral vascular disease. These conditions are responsible for the majority of cases of diabetes-related disability and death. Current edition of the “Standards” emphasizes the patient-oriented approach in making decisions on therapeutic goals, such as levels of glycaemia and blood pressure. It also features updated guidelines on the management of Type 2 DM and its vascular complications, added information about bariatric surgery as a method of treatment of DM with morbide obesity. This text represents a consensus by the absolute majority of national experts, achieved through a number of fruitful discussions held at national meetings and forums. These guidelines are intended for endocrinologists and diabetologists, primary care physicians, cardiologists and other medical professionals involved in prevention and treatment of DM. On behalf of the Working Group
96 citations
Authors
Showing all 8045 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Yehuda Shoenfeld | 125 | 1629 | 77195 |
Jatin P. Shah | 119 | 725 | 45680 |
Shahrokh F. Shariat | 118 | 1637 | 58900 |
Vladimir P. Torchilin | 109 | 627 | 58977 |
Klaus-Peter Lesch | 106 | 524 | 50099 |
Jürgen Kurths | 105 | 1038 | 62179 |
Rudolf Valenta | 102 | 748 | 38349 |
Valerian E. Kagan | 97 | 667 | 39888 |
Hans-Uwe Simon | 96 | 461 | 51698 |
Gleb B. Sukhorukov | 96 | 440 | 35549 |
Michael Aschner | 91 | 806 | 32826 |
Alexei Verkhratsky | 89 | 450 | 29788 |
Claudio L. Bassetti | 88 | 524 | 25332 |
Helgi B. Schiöth | 85 | 531 | 28628 |
Angelo Ravelli | 79 | 415 | 23439 |