scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Medical University of Graz

EducationGraz, Steiermark, Austria
About: Medical University of Graz is a education organization based out in Graz, Steiermark, Austria. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 5684 authors who have published 12349 publications receiving 417282 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The study suggests that host genetic variation in these regulators of complement activation plays a role in determining the occurrence of invasive disease versus asymptomatic colonization by this pathogen.
Abstract: Meningococcal disease is an infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis. Genetic factors contribute to host susceptibility and progression to disease, but the genes responsible for disease development are largely unknown. We report here a genome-wide association study for host susceptibility to meningococcal disease using 475 individuals with meningococcal disease (cases) and 4,703 population controls from the UK. We performed, in Western European and South European cohorts (consisting of 968 cases and 1,376 controls), two replication studies for the most significant SNPs. A cluster of complement factor SNPs replicated independently in both cohorts, including SNPs within complement factor H (CFH) (rs1065489 (p.936D

293 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This first large study in untreated patients with multiple sclerosis with different disease subtypes shows that brain atrophy proceeds relentlessly throughout the course of MS, with a rate that seems largely independent of the MS subtype, when adjusting for baseline brain volume.
Abstract: Objective: To assess the time course of brain atrophy and the difference across clinical subtypes in multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: The percent brain volume change (PBVC) was computed on existing longitudinal (2 time points) T1-weighted MRI from untreated (trial and nontrial) patients with MS. Patients (n = 963) were classified as clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of MS (CIS, 16%), relapsing-remitting (RR, 60%), secondary progressive (SP, 15%), and primary progressive (9%) MS. The median length of follow-up was 14 months (range 12–68). Results: There was marked heterogeneity of the annualized PBVC (PBVC/y) across MS subtypes ( p = 0.003), with higher PBVC/y in SP than in CIS ( p = 0.003). However, this heterogeneity disappeared when data were corrected for the baseline normalized brain volume. When the MS population was divided into trial and nontrial subjects, the heterogeneity of PBVC/y across MS subtypes was present only in the second group, due to the higher PBVC/y values found in trial data in CIS ( p = 0.01) and RR ( p Conclusions: This first large study in untreated patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with different disease subtypes shows that brain atrophy proceeds relentlessly throughout the course of MS, with a rate that seems largely independent of the MS subtype, when adjusting for baseline brain volume.

291 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A deep learning system able to identify the most common skin conditions may help clinicians in making more accurate diagnoses in routine clinical practice.
Abstract: Skin conditions affect 1.9 billion people. Because of a shortage of dermatologists, most cases are seen instead by general practitioners with lower diagnostic accuracy. We present a deep learning system (DLS) to provide a differential diagnosis of skin conditions using 16,114 de-identified cases (photographs and clinical data) from a teledermatology practice serving 17 sites. The DLS distinguishes between 26 common skin conditions, representing 80% of cases seen in primary care, while also providing a secondary prediction covering 419 skin conditions. On 963 validation cases, where a rotating panel of three board-certified dermatologists defined the reference standard, the DLS was non-inferior to six other dermatologists and superior to six primary care physicians (PCPs) and six nurse practitioners (NPs) (top-1 accuracy: 0.66 DLS, 0.63 dermatologists, 0.44 PCPs and 0.40 NPs). These results highlight the potential of the DLS to assist general practitioners in diagnosing skin conditions.

288 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work estimated population in 195 locations by single year of age and single calendar year from 1950 to 2017 with standardised and replicable methods and used the cohort-component method of population projection, with inputs of fertility, mortality, population, and migration data.

287 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Nov 2010-Allergy
TL;DR: General considerations on rapid desensitization for drug hypersensitivity – a consensus statement.
Abstract: Drug hypersensitivity reactions can occur with most drugs, are unpredictable, may affect any organ or system, and range widely in clinical severity from mild pruritus to anaphylaxis. In most cases, the suspected drug is avoided in the future. However, for certain patients, the particular drug may be essential for optimal therapy. Under these circumstances, desensitization may be performed. Drug desensitization is defined as the induction of a temporary state of tolerance of a compound responsible for a hypersensitivity reaction. It is performed by administering increasing doses of the medication concerned over a short period of time (from several hours to a few days) until the total cumulative therapeutic dose is achieved and tolerated. It is a high-risk procedure used only in patients in whom alternatives are less effective or not available after a positive risk/benefit analysis. Desensitization protocols have been developed and are used in patients with allergic reactions to antibiotics (mainly penicillin), insulins, sulfonamides, chemotherapeutic and biologic agents, and many other drugs. Desensitization is mainly performed in IgE-mediated reactions, but also in reactions where drug-specific IgE have not been demonstrated. Desensitization induces a temporary tolerant state, which can only be maintained by continuous administration of the medication. Thus, for treatments like chemotherapy, which have an average interval of 4 weeks between cycles, the procedure must be repeated for every new course. In this paper, some background information on rapid desensitization procedures is provided. We define the drugs and drug reactions indicated for such procedures, describe the possible mechanism of action, and discuss the indications and contraindications. The data should serve as background information for a database (accessible via the EAACI-homepage) with standardized protocols for rapid desensitization for antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents, monoclonal antibodies/fusion proteins, and other drugs.

287 citations


Authors

Showing all 5763 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Ian J. Deary1661795114161
James F. Wilson146677101883
Nancy L. Pedersen14589094696
William Wijns12775295517
Andrew Simmons10246036608
Franz Fazekas10162949775
Hans-Peter Hartung10081049792
Michael Trauner9866735543
Dietmar Fuchs97111939758
Funda Meric-Bernstam9675336803
Ulf Landmesser9456446096
Aysegul A. Sahin9332230038
Frank Madeo9226945942
Takayoshi Ohkubo9163169634
Jürgen C. Becker9063728741
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

94% related

Brigham and Women's Hospital
110.5K papers, 6.8M citations

94% related

Baylor College of Medicine
94.8K papers, 5M citations

93% related

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
52.5K papers, 2.9M citations

93% related

Boston Children's Hospital
215.5K papers, 6.8M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202334
2022116
20211,411
20201,227
20191,015
2018917