Institution
Pan American Health Organization
Healthcare•Havana, Cuba•
About: Pan American Health Organization is a healthcare organization based out in Havana, Cuba. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Public health. The organization has 1500 authors who have published 2263 publications receiving 83705 citations. The organization is also known as: HO Regional Office for the Americas.
Topics: Population, Public health, Health care, Latin Americans, Vaccination
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: First multicenter program evaluation of influenza vaccine effectiveness in Latin America shows moderate protection among young children and older adults and successful integration of influenza surveillance and vaccination platforms.
25 citations
••
TL;DR: The suite of existing pandemic preparedness generic epidemiological early investigation protocols was rapidly adapted for COVID-19, branded the "UNITY studies" and promoted globally for the implementation of standardized and quality studies.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The declaration of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on 30 January 2020 required rapid implementation of early investigations to inform appropriate national and global public health actions. METHODS: The suite of existing pandemic preparedness generic epidemiological early investigation protocols was rapidly adapted for COVID-19, branded the 'UNITY studies' and promoted globally for the implementation of standardized and quality studies. Ten protocols were developed investigating household (HH) transmission, the first few cases (FFX), population seroprevalence (SEROPREV), health facilities transmission (n = 2), vaccine effectiveness (n = 2), pregnancy outcomes and transmission, school transmission, and surface contamination. Implementation was supported by WHO and its partners globally, with emphasis to support building surveillance and research capacities in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). RESULTS: WHO generic protocols were rapidly developed and published on the WHO website, 5/10 protocols within the first 3 months of the response. As of 30 June 2021, 172 investigations were implemented by 97 countries, of which 62 (64%) were LMIC. The majority of countries implemented population seroprevalence (71 countries) and first few cases/household transmission (37 countries) studies. CONCLUSION: The widespread adoption of UNITY protocols across all WHO regions indicates that they addressed subnational and national needs to support local public health decision-making to prevent and control the pandemic.
25 citations
••
TL;DR: It is argued that clarity around decision-making by agencies, after using this framework, may help increase trust about the intervention and solidarity within and between populations affected by these disasters and the agencies who support public health or provide assistance during disasters.
Abstract: Disasters involving severe air pollution episodes create a pressing public health issue. During such emergencies, there may be pressure on agencies to provide solutions to protect affected communities. One possible intervention to reduce exposure during such crises is facemasks. Ethical values need to be considered as part of any decision-making process to assess whether to provide advice on, recommend and/or distribute any public health intervention. In this paper, we use principles from public health ethics to analyse the critical ethical issues that relate to agencies providing advice on, recommending and/or distributing facemasks in air pollution disasters, given a lack of evidence of both the specific risk of some polluting events or the effectiveness of facemasks in community settings. The need for reflection on the ethical issues raised by the possible recommendation/use of facemasks to mitigate potential health issues arising from air pollution disasters is critical as communities progressively seek personal interventions to manage perceived and actual risks. This paper develops an ethical decision-making framework to assist agency deliberations. We argue that clarity around decision-making by agencies, after using this framework, may help increase trust about the intervention and solidarity within and between populations affected by these disasters and the agencies who support public health or provide assistance during disasters.
25 citations
••
TL;DR: This study demonstrated three important points for cholera prevention: seafood should be eaten cooked and hot; populations at risk should be taught to treat household drinking water and to avoid drinking water outside the home unless it is known to be treated; and education about hygiene can be an important tool in preventingCholera.
Abstract: In response to the Latin American cholera epidemic, El Salvador began a prevention programme in April 1991. The first case was confirmed in August, and 700 cases were reported within 3 months. A matched case-control study was conducted in rural La Libertad Department in November 1991. Illness was associated with eating cold cooked or raw seafood (odds ratio [OR] = 7.0; 95% confidence limits [CL] = 1.4, 35.0) and with drinking water outside the home (OR = 8.8; 95% CL = 1.7, 44.6). Assertion of knowledge about how to prevent cholera (OR = 0.2; 95% CL = 0.1, 0.8) and eating rice (OR = 0.2; 95% CL = 0.1, 0.8) were protective. More controls than patients regularly used soap (OR = 0.3; 95% CL = 0.1, 1.0). This study demonstrated three important points for cholera prevention: (1) seafood should be eaten cooked and hot; (2) populations at risk should be taught to treat household drinking water and to avoid drinking water outside the home unless it is known to be treated; and (3) education about hygiene can be an important tool in preventing cholera.
25 citations
••
University of Barcelona1, University of Southern Denmark2, Fundación Favaloro3, Universidade Federal de Goiás4, University of Buenos Aires5, University of La Frontera6, University of Guadalajara7, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires8, University of Mississippi Medical Center9, University of Queensland10, National University of Cordoba11, Public Health Foundation of India12, Uppsala University13, Shanghai Jiao Tong University14, University of Melbourne15, South African Medical Research Council16, University of Valencia17, State University of New York System18, Favaloro University19, Pan American Health Organization20, Population Health Research Institute21, University of Milan22
TL;DR: The consensus opinion is to have a period of lifestyle alone reserved only to patients with grade 1 "isolated" hypertension, and men ≥55 years and women ≥60 years with uncomplicated grade 1 hypertension should automatically be classified within the moderate absolute total CVR category, even in the absence of other major CVR factors and risk modifiers.
25 citations
Authors
Showing all 1503 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Marcello Tonelli | 128 | 701 | 115576 |
Stephen L. Hoffman | 104 | 458 | 38597 |
Peter Singer | 94 | 702 | 37128 |
James C. Anthony | 94 | 401 | 43875 |
Bruce G. Link | 92 | 307 | 45777 |
Andrew E. Skodol | 88 | 252 | 24975 |
Marie T. Ruel | 77 | 300 | 22862 |
Franco M. Muggia | 64 | 393 | 18587 |
María G. Guzmán | 63 | 272 | 15992 |
Rob McConnell | 63 | 250 | 17973 |
José M. Belizán | 53 | 198 | 11892 |
Agustin Conde-Agudelo | 52 | 87 | 12009 |
Denise L. Doolan | 49 | 199 | 10581 |
Brendan Flannery | 48 | 177 | 8004 |
Martha Sedegah | 45 | 120 | 9304 |