Institution
Pan American Health Organization
Healthcare•Havana, Cuba•
About: Pan American Health Organization is a healthcare organization based out in Havana, Cuba. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Public health. The organization has 1500 authors who have published 2263 publications receiving 83705 citations. The organization is also known as: HO Regional Office for the Americas.
Topics: Population, Public health, Health care, Latin Americans, Vaccination
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: If there is any causal relation between measles vaccination and Guillain-Barré syndrome, data from the vaccination of more than 70 million children were not sufficient to detect a rise in the number of observed GBS cases beyond the expected number.
64 citations
••
TL;DR: Some countries of the Americas have experienced a rise in adolescent and youth suicide during the study period, with males at a higher risk of committing suicide than females.
64 citations
••
University of Ottawa1, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute2, American University of Beirut3, Public Health Agency of Canada4, Hospital for Sick Children5, University of Toronto6, Pan American Health Organization7, Dalhousie University8, Stanford University9, University of Adelaide10, Queen's University11, World Health Organization12, University of Western Ontario13, University of Split14, McMaster University15, University of Sydney16, University of Plymouth17, Monash University18, University of London19, Georgia State University20, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health21, Baruch College22, RMIT University23, Mayo Clinic24, Cochrane Collaboration25, Université de Montréal26, University of Louisville27, George Mason University28
TL;DR: Consensus based guidance is provided on when to replicate and not replicate systematic reviews of systematic reviews.
Abstract: Replication is an essential part of the scientific method, yet replication of systematic reviews is too often overlooked, and done unnecessarily or poorly. Excessive replication (doing the same study repeatedly) is unethical and a cause of research wastage. This article provides consensus based guidance on when to replicate and not replicate systematic reviews.
64 citations
••
TL;DR: Consistently high levels of syphilis among the investigated populations throughout the study period show that there is a need to improve monitoring, surveillance, and evaluation of sexually transmitted infection control interventions among these populations.
64 citations
Authors
Showing all 1503 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Marcello Tonelli | 128 | 701 | 115576 |
Stephen L. Hoffman | 104 | 458 | 38597 |
Peter Singer | 94 | 702 | 37128 |
James C. Anthony | 94 | 401 | 43875 |
Bruce G. Link | 92 | 307 | 45777 |
Andrew E. Skodol | 88 | 252 | 24975 |
Marie T. Ruel | 77 | 300 | 22862 |
Franco M. Muggia | 64 | 393 | 18587 |
María G. Guzmán | 63 | 272 | 15992 |
Rob McConnell | 63 | 250 | 17973 |
José M. Belizán | 53 | 198 | 11892 |
Agustin Conde-Agudelo | 52 | 87 | 12009 |
Denise L. Doolan | 49 | 199 | 10581 |
Brendan Flannery | 48 | 177 | 8004 |
Martha Sedegah | 45 | 120 | 9304 |