scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of California, San Francisco

EducationSan Francisco, California, United States
About: University of California, San Francisco is a education organization based out in San Francisco, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 83381 authors who have published 186236 publications receiving 12068420 citations. The organization is also known as: UCSF & UC San Francisco.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Hip instability and mechanical loosening are the most common indications for revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States, and this information will be valuable in directing future research, implant design, and clinical decision-making.
Abstract: Background: Understanding the causes of failure and the types of revision total hip arthroplasty performed is essential for guiding research, implant design, clinical decision-making, and health-care policy. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the mechanisms of failure and the types of revision total hip arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States with use of newly implemented ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) diagnosis and procedure codes related specifically to revision total hip arthroplasty in a large, nationally representative population. Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to analyze clinical, demographic, and economic data from 51,345 revision total hip arthroplasty procedures performed between October 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006. The prevalence of revision procedures was calculated for population subgroups in the United States that were stratified according to age, sex, diagnosis, census region, primary payer class, and type of hospital. The cause of failure, the average length of stay, and total charges were also determined for each type of revision arthroplasty procedure. Results: The most common type of revision total hip arthroplasty procedure performed was all-component revision (41.1%), and the most common causes of revision were instability/dislocation (22.5%), mechanical loosening (19.7%), and infection (14.8%). Revision total hip arthroplasty procedures were most commonly performed in large, urban, nonteaching hospitals for Medicare patients seventy-five to eighty-four years of age. The average length of hospital stay for all types of revision arthroplasties was 6.2 days, and the average total charges were $54,553. However, the average length of stay, average charges, and procedure frequencies varied considerably according to census region, hospital type, and type of revision total hip arthroplasty procedure performed. Conclusions: Hip instability and mechanical loosening are the most common indications for revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. As further experience is gained with the new diagnosis and procedure codes specifically related to revision total hip arthroplasty, this information will be valuable in directing future research, implant design, and clinical decision-making. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

1,448 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To stimulate a critical examination of moral injury, a working conceptual framework and a set of intervention strategies designed to repair moral injury are offered.

1,446 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Robert S. Fisher1, Vicenta Salanova2, Thomas C. Witt2, Robert M. Worth2, Thomas R. Henry3, Robert E. Gross3, Kalarickal J. Oommen4, Ivan Osorio5, Jules M. Nazzaro5, Douglas Labar6, Michael G. Kaplitt6, Michael R. Sperling7, Evan Sandok8, John H. Neal8, Adrian Handforth9, John M. Stern10, Antonio DeSalles9, Steve Chung11, Andrew G. Shetter11, Donna Bergen12, Roy A.E. Bakay12, Jaimie M. Henderson1, Jacqueline A. French13, Gordon H. Baltuch13, William E. Rosenfeld, Andrew Youkilis, William J. Marks14, Paul A. Garcia14, Nicolas Barbaro14, Nathan B. Fountain15, Carl W. Bazil16, Robert R. Goodman16, Guy M. McKhann16, K. Babu Krishnamurthy17, Steven Papavassiliou17, Charles M. Epstein3, John R. Pollard13, Lisa Tonder18, Joan Grebin18, Robert J. Coffey18, Nina M. Graves18, Marc A. Dichter, William Elias, Paul Francel, Robert C. Frysinger, Kevin Graber, John Grant, Gary Heit, Susan T. Herman, Padmaja Kandula, Andres M. Kanner, Jeanne Ann King, Eric Kobylarz, Karen Lapp, Suzette M. LaRoche, Susan Lippmann, Rama Maganti, Timothy Mapstone, Dragos Sabau, Lara M. Schrader, Ashwini Sharan, Mike Smith, David M. Treiman, Steve Wilkinson, Steven Wong, Andro Zangaladze, Shelley Adderley, Brian Bridges, Mimi Callanan, Dawn Cordero, Cecelia Fields, Megan Johnson, MaryAnn Kavalir, Patsy Kretschmar, Carol Macpherson, Kathy Mancl, Marsha Manley, Stephanie Marsh, Jean Montgomery, Pam Mundt, Phani Priya Nekkalapu, Bill Nikolov, Bruce Palmer, Linda Perdue, Alison Randall, David Smith, Linda Smith, Kristen Strybing, Leigh Stott, Robin Taylor, Stacy Thompson, Zornitza Timenova, Bree Vogelsong, Virginia Balbona, Donna K. Broshek, Deborah A. Cahn-Weiner, Lisa Clift, Mary Davidson, Evan Drake, Sally Frutiger, Lynette Featherstone, Chris Grote, Dan Han, Dianne Henry, Jessica Horsfall, Andrea Hovick, Jennifer Gray, David Kareken, Kristin Kirlin, Debbie Livingood, Michele Meyer, Nancy Minniti, Jeannine Morrone Strupinsky, William Schultz, James Scott, Joseph I. Tracy, Stuart Waltonen, Penelope Ziefert, Carla Van Amburg, Mark E Burdelle, Sandra Clements, Robert Cox, Raeleen Dolin, Michelle Fulk, Harinder R. Kaur, Lawrence J. Hirsch, Thomas J. Hoeppner, Andrea Hurt, Mary Komosa, Scott E. Krahl, Laura Ponticello, Mark Quigg, Helene Quinn, Marvin A. Rossi, Patty Schaefer, Christopher Skidmore, Diane Sundstrom, Patricia Trudeau, Monica Volz, Norman C. Wang, Lynette Will, Carol Young 
TL;DR: A multicenter, double‐blind, randomized trial of bilateral stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus for localization‐related epilepsy is reported.
Abstract: Summary Purpose: We report a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of bilateral stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus for localization-related epilepsy Methods: Participants were adults with medically refractory partial seizures, including secondarily generalized seizures Half received stimulation and half no stimulation during a 3-month blinded phase; then all received unblinded stimulation Results: One hundred ten participants were randomized Baseline monthly median seizure frequency was 195 In the last month of the blinded phase the stimulated group had a 29% greater reduction in seizures compared with the control group, as estimated by a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model (p = 0002) Unadjusted median declines at the end of the blinded phase were 145% in the control group and 404% in the stimulated group Complex partial and “most severe” seizures were significantly reduced by stimulation By 2 years, there was a 56% median percent reduction in seizure frequency; 54% of patients had a seizure reduction of at least 50%, and 14 patients were seizure-free for at least 6 months Five deaths occurred and none were from implantation or stimulation No participant had symptomatic hemorrhage or brain infection Two participants had acute, transient stimulation-associated seizures Cognition and mood showed no group differences, but participants in the stimulated group were more likely to report depression or memory problems as adverse events Discussion: Bilateral stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus reduces seizures Benefit persisted for 2 years of study Complication rates were modest Deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamus is useful for some people with medically refractory partial and secondarily generalized seizures

1,444 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
17 Oct 1997-Science
TL;DR: In this paper, the number of GABA-expressing cells in neocortical slices is reduced by separating the neocortex from the subcortical telencephalon, and mice lacking the homeodomain proteins DLX-1/DLX-2 show no detectable cell migration from the cell to the brain.
Abstract: Although previous analyses indicate that neocortical neurons originate from the cortical proliferative zone, evidence suggests that a subpopulation of neocortical interneurons originates within the subcortical telencephalon. For example, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-expressing cells migrate in vitro from the subcortical telencephalon into the neocortex. The number of GABA-expressing cells in neocortical slices is reduced by separating the neocortex from the subcortical telencephalon. Finally, mice lacking the homeodomain proteins DLX-1 and DLX-2 show no detectable cell migration from the subcortical telencephalon to the neocortex and also have few GABA-expressing cells in the neocortex.

1,438 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Biomedicalization describes the increasingly complex, multisited, multidirectional processes of medicalization, both extended and reconstituted through the new social forms of highly technoscientific biomedicine.
Abstract: The first social transformation of American medicine institutionally established medicine by the end of World War II. In the next decades, medicalization-the expansion of medical jurisdiction, authority, and practices into new realms-became widespread. Since about 1985, dramatic changes in both the organization and practices of contemporary biomedicine, implemented largely through the integration of technoscientific innovations, have been coalescing into what the authors call biomedicalization, a second transformation of American medicine. Biomedicalization describes the increasingly complex, multisited, multidirectional processes of medicalization, both extended and reconstituted through the new social forms of highly technoscientific biomedicine. The historical shift from medicalization to biomedicalization is one from control over biomedical phenomena to transformations of them. Five key interactive processes both engender biomedicalization and are produced through it: (1) the political economic reconstitution of the vast sector of biomedicine; (2) the focus on health itself and the elaboration of risk and surveillance biomedicines; (3) the increasingly technological and scientific nature of biomedicine; (4) transformations in how biomedical knowledges are produced, distributed, and consumed, and in medical information management; and (5) transformations of bodies to include new properties and the production of new individual and collective technoscientific identities.

1,437 citations


Authors

Showing all 84066 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Robert Langer2812324326306
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
Gordon H. Guyatt2311620228631
Eugene Braunwald2301711264576
John Q. Trojanowski2261467213948
Fred H. Gage216967185732
Robert J. Lefkowitz214860147995
Peter Libby211932182724
Edward Giovannucci2061671179875
Rob Knight2011061253207
Irving L. Weissman2011141172504
Eugene V. Koonin1991063175111
Peter J. Barnes1941530166618
Virginia M.-Y. Lee194993148820
Gordon B. Mills1871273186451
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
National Institutes of Health
297.8K papers, 21.3M citations

98% related

University of Pittsburgh
201K papers, 9.6M citations

96% related

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
185.3K papers, 9.9M citations

96% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

Harvard University
530.3K papers, 38.1M citations

96% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20241
2023179
2022981
202111,518
202010,575
20199,343