Showing papers in "arXiv: Computational Complexity in 2014"

Edit Distance Cannot Be Computed in Strongly Subquadratic Time (unless SETH is false)

Abstract: The edit distance (a.k.a. the Levenshtein distance) between two strings is defined as the minimum number of insertions, deletions or substitutions of symbols needed to transform one string into another. The problem of computing the edit distance between two strings is a classical computational task, with a well-known algorithm based on dynamic programming. Unfortunately, all known algorithms for this problem run in nearly quadratic time. In this paper we provide evidence that the near-quadratic running time bounds known for the problem of computing edit distance might be tight. Specifically, we show that, if the edit distance can be computed in time $O(n^{2-\delta})$ for some constant $\delta>0$, then the satisfiability of conjunctive normal form formulas with $N$ variables and $M$ clauses can be solved in time $M^{O(1)} 2^{(1-\epsilon)N}$ for a constant $\epsilon>0$. The latter result would violate the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis, which postulates that such algorithms do not exist.

A Survey on the Computational Complexity of Colouring Graphs with Forbidden Subgraphs

Abstract: For a positive integer $k$, a $k$-colouring of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a mapping $c: V\rightarrow\{1,2,...,k\}$ such that $c(u) eq c(v)$ whenever $uv\in E$. The Colouring problem is to decide, for a given $G$ and $k$, whether a $k$-colouring of $G$ exists. If $k$ is fixed (that is, it is not part of the input), we have the decision problem $k$-Colouring instead. We survey known results on the computational complexity of Colouring and $k$-Colouring for graph classes that are characterized by one or two forbidden induced subgraphs. We also consider a number of variants: for example, where the problem is to extend a partial colouring, or where lists of permissible colours are given for each vertex.

Reconfiguration in bounded bandwidth and treedepth

Abstract: We show that several reconfiguration problems known to be PSPACE-complete remain so even when limited to graphs of bounded bandwidth. The essential step is noticing the similarity to very limited string rewriting systems, whose ability to directly simulate Turing Machines is classically known. This resolves a question posed open in [Bonsma P., 2012]. On the other hand, we show that a large class of reconfiguration problems becomes tractable on graphs of bounded treedepth, and that this result is in some sense tight.

Boolean function monotonicity testing requires (almost) $n^{1/2}$ non-adaptive queries

Abstract: We prove a lower bound of $\Omega(n^{1/2 - c})$, for all $c>0$, on the query complexity of (two-sided error) non-adaptive algorithms for testing whether an $n$-variable Boolean function is monotone versus constant-far from monotone. This improves a $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{1/5})$ lower bound for the same problem that was recently given in [CST14] and is very close to $\Omega(n^{1/2})$, which we conjecture is the optimal lower bound for this model.

New algorithms and lower bounds for circuits with linear threshold gates

Abstract: Let $ACC \circ THR$ be the class of constant-depth circuits comprised of AND, OR, and MOD$m$ gates (for some constant $m > 1$), with a bottom layer of gates computing arbitrary linear threshold functions. This class of circuits can be seen as a "midpoint" between $ACC$ (where we know nontrivial lower bounds) and depth-two linear threshold circuits (where nontrivial lower bounds remain open). We give an algorithm for evaluating an arbitrary symmetric function of $2^{n^{o(1)}}$ $ACC \circ THR$ circuits of size $2^{n^{o(1)}}$, on all possible inputs, in $2^n \cdot poly(n)$ time. Several consequences are derived: $\bullet$ The number of satisfying assignments to an $ACC \circ THR$ circuit of subexponential size can be computed in $2^{n-n^{\varepsilon}}$ time (where $\varepsilon > 0$ depends on the depth and modulus of the circuit). $\bullet$ $NEXP$ does not have quasi-polynomial size $ACC \circ THR$ circuits, nor does $NEXP$ have quasi-polynomial size $ACC \circ SYM$ circuits. Nontrivial size lower bounds were not known even for $AND \circ OR \circ THR$ circuits. $\bullet$ Every 0-1 integer linear program with $n$ Boolean variables and $s$ linear constraints is solvable in $2^{n-\Omega(n/((\log M)(\log s)^{5}))}\cdot poly(s,n,M)$ time with high probability, where $M$ upper bounds the bit complexity of the coefficients. (For example, 0-1 integer programs with weights in $[-2^{poly(n)},2^{poly(n)}]$ and $poly(n)$ constraints can be solved in $2^{n-\Omega(n/\log^6 n)}$ time.) We also present an algorithm for evaluating depth-two linear threshold circuits (a.k.a., $THR \circ THR$) with exponential weights and $2^{n/24}$ size on all $2^n$ input assignments, running in $2^n \cdot poly(n)$ time. This is evidence that non-uniform lower bounds for $THR \circ THR$ are within reach.

Fast Matrix Multiplication: Limitations of the Laser Method

Abstract: Until a few years ago, the fastest known matrix multiplication algorithm, due to Coppersmith and Winograd (1990), ran in time $O(n^{23755})$ Recently, a surge of activity by Stothers, Vassilevska-Williams, and Le Gall has led to an improved algorithm running in time $O(n^{23729})$ These algorithms are obtained by analyzing higher and higher tensor powers of a certain identity of Coppersmith and Winograd We show that this exact approach cannot result in an algorithm with running time $O(n^{23725})$, and identify a wide class of variants of this approach which cannot result in an algorithm with running time $O(n^{23078})$; in particular, this approach cannot prove the conjecture that for every $\epsilon > 0$, two $n\times n$ matrices can be multiplied in time $O(n^{2+\epsilon})$ We describe a new framework extending the original laser method, which is the method underlying the previously mentioned algorithms Our framework accommodates the algorithms by Coppersmith and Winograd, Stothers, Vassilevska-Williams and Le Gall We obtain our main result by analyzing this framework The framework is also the first to explain why taking tensor powers of the Coppersmith-Winograd identity results in faster algorithms

The Parameterized Complexity of k-Biclique

Abstract: Given a graph $G$ and a parameter $k$, the $k$-biclique problem asks whether $G$ contains a complete bipartite subgraph $K_{k,k}$. This is the most easily stated problem on graphs whose parameterized complexity is still unknown. We provide an fpt-reduction from $k$-clique to $k$-biclique, thus solving this longstanding open problem. Our reduction use a class of bipartite graphs with a threshold property of independent interest. More specifically, for positive integers $n$, $s$ and $t$, we consider a bipartite graph $G=(A\;\dot\cup\;B, E)$ such that $A$ can be partitioned into $A=V_1\;\dot\cup \;V_2\;\dot\cup\cdots\dot\cup\; V_n$ and for every $s$ distinct indices $i_1\cdots i_s$, there exist $v_{i_1}\in V_{i_1}\cdots v_{i_s}\in V_{i_s}$ such that $v_{i_1}\cdots v_{i_s}$ have at least $t+1$ common neighbors in $B$; on the other hand, every $s+1$ distinct vertices in $A$ have at most $t$ common neighbors in $B$. Using the Paley-type graphs and Weil's character sum theorem, we show that for $t=(s+1)!$ and $n$ large enough, such threshold bipartite graphs can be computed in $n^{O(1)}$. One corollary of our reduction is that there is no $f(k)\cdot n^{o(k)}$ time algorithm to decide whether a graph contains a subgraph isomorphic to $K_{k!,k!}$ unless the ETH(Exponential Time Hypothesis) fails. We also provide a probabilistic construction with better parameters $t=\Theta(s^2)$, which indicates that $k$-biclique has no $f(k)\cdot n^{o(\sqrt{k})}$-time algorithm unless 3-SAT with $m$ clauses can be solved in $2^{o(m)}$-time with high probability. Our result also implies the dichotomy classification of the parameterized complexity of cardinality constrain satisfaction problem and the inapproximability of maximum $k$-intersection problem.

Computational Limits for Matrix Completion

Abstract: Matrix Completion is the problem of recovering an unknown real-valued low-rank matrix from a subsample of its entries. Important recent results show that the problem can be solved efficiently under the assumption that the unknown matrix is incoherent and the subsample is drawn uniformly at random. Are these assumptions necessary? It is well known that Matrix Completion in its full generality is NP-hard. However, little is known if make additional assumptions such as incoherence and permit the algorithm to output a matrix of slightly higher rank. In this paper we prove that Matrix Completion remains computationally intractable even if the unknown matrix has rank $4$ but we are allowed to output any constant rank matrix, and even if additionally we assume that the unknown matrix is incoherent and are shown $90%$ of the entries. This result relies on the conjectured hardness of the $4$-Coloring problem. We also consider the positive semidefinite Matrix Completion problem. Here we show a similar hardness result under the standard assumption that $\mathrm{P} e \mathrm{NP}.$ Our results greatly narrow the gap between existing feasibility results and computational lower bounds. In particular, we believe that our results give the first complexity-theoretic justification for why distributional assumptions are needed beyond the incoherence assumption in order to obtain positive results. On the technical side, we contribute several new ideas on how to encode hard combinatorial problems in low-rank optimization problems. We hope that these techniques will be helpful in further understanding the computational limits of Matrix Completion and related problems.

0-1 Integer Linear Programming with a Linear Number of Constraints

Abstract: We give an exact algorithm for the 0-1 Integer Linear Programming problem with a linear number of constraints that improves over exhaustive search by an exponential factor. Specifically, our algorithm runs in time $2^{(1-\text{poly}(1/c))n}$ where n is the number of variables and cn is the number of constraints. The key idea for the algorithm is a reduction to the Vector Domination problem and a new algorithm for that subproblem.

Finding Shortest Paths between Graph Colourings

Abstract: The $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem asks whether, for a given graph $G$, two proper $k$-colourings $\alpha$ and $\beta$ of $G$, and a positive integer $\ell$, there exists a sequence of at most $\ell+1$ proper $k$-colourings of $G$ which starts with $\alpha$ and ends with $\beta$ and where successive colourings in the sequence differ on exactly one vertex of $G$. We give a complete picture of the parameterized complexity of the $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem for each fixed $k$ when parameterized by $\ell$. First we show that the $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem is polynomial-time solvable for $k=3$, settling an open problem of Cereceda, van den Heuvel and Johnson. Then, for all $k \geq 4$, we show that the $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem, when parameterized by $\ell$, is fixed-parameter tractable (addressing a question of Mouawad, Nishimura, Raman, Simjour and Suzuki) but that it has no polynomial kernel unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses.

On the power of homogeneous depth 4 arithmetic circuits

Abstract: We prove exponential lower bounds on the size of homogeneous depth 4 arithmetic circuits computing an explicit polynomial in $VP$. Our results hold for the {\it Iterated Matrix Multiplication} polynomial - in particular we show that any homogeneous depth 4 circuit computing the $(1,1)$ entry in the product of $n$ generic matrices of dimension $n^{O(1)}$ must have size $n^{\Omega(\sqrt{n})}$. Our results strengthen previous works in two significant ways. Our lower bounds hold for a polynomial in $VP$. Prior to our work, Kayal et al [KLSS14] proved an exponential lower bound for homogeneous depth 4 circuits (over fields of characteristic zero) computing a poly in $VNP$. The best known lower bounds for a depth 4 homogeneous circuit computing a poly in $VP$ was the bound of $n^{\Omega(\log n)}$ by [LSS, KLSS14].Our exponential lower bounds also give the first exponential separation between general arithmetic circuits and homogeneous depth 4 arithmetic circuits. In particular they imply that the depth reduction results of Koiran [Koi12] and Tavenas [Tav13] are tight even for reductions to general homogeneous depth 4 circuits (without the restriction of bounded bottom fanin). Our lower bound holds over all fields. The lower bound of [KLSS14] worked only over fields of characteristic zero. Prior to our work, the best lower bound for homogeneous depth 4 circuits over fields of positive characteristic was $n^{\Omega(\log n)}$ [LSS, KLSS14].

Algorithmic complexity for psychology: A user-friendly implementation of the coding theorem method

Abstract: Kolmogorov-Chaitin complexity has long been believed to be impossible to approximate when it comes to short sequences (e.g. of length 5-50). However, with the newly developed \emph{coding theorem method} the complexity of strings of length 2-11 can now be numerically estimated. We present the theoretical basis of algorithmic complexity for short strings (ACSS) and describe an R-package providing functions based on ACSS that will cover psychologists' needs and improve upon previous methods in three ways: (1) ACSS is now available not only for binary strings, but for strings based on up to 9 different symbols, (2) ACSS no longer requires time-consuming computing, and (3) a new approach based on ACSS gives access to an estimation of the complexity of strings of any length. Finally, three illustrative examples show how these tools can be applied to psychology.

On Termination of Integer Linear Loops

Abstract: A fundamental problem in program verification concerns the termination of simple linear loops of the form x := u ; while Bx >= b do {x := Ax + a} where x is a vector of variables, u, a, and c are integer vectors, and A and B are integer matrices. Assuming the matrix A is diagonalisable, we give a decision procedure for the problem of whether, for all initial integer vectors u, such a loop terminates. The correctness of our algorithm relies on sophisticated tools from algebraic and analytic number theory, Diophantine geometry, and real algebraic geometry. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first substantial advance on a 10-year-old open problem of Tiwari (2004) and Braverman (2006).

Into the Square - On the Complexity of Quadratic-Time Solvable Problems

Abstract: This paper will analyze several quadratic-time solvable problems, and will classify them into two classes: problems that are solvable in truly subquadratic time (that is, in time $O(n^{2-\epsilon})$ for some $\epsilon>0$) and problems that are not, unless the well known Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) is false. In particular, we will prove that some quadratic-time solvable problems are indeed easier than expected. We will provide an algorithm that computes the transitive closure of a directed graph in time $O(mn^{\frac{\omega+1}{4}})$, where $m$ denotes the number of edges in the transitive closure and $\omega$ is the exponent for matrix multiplication. As a side effect, we will prove that our algorithm runs in time $O(n^{\frac{5}{3}})$ if the transitive closure is sparse. The same time bounds hold if we want to check whether a graph is transitive, by replacing m with the number of edges in the graph itself. As far as we know, this is the fastest algorithm for sparse transitive digraph recognition. Finally, we will apply our algorithm to the comparability graph recognition problem (dating back to 1941), obtaining the first truly subquadratic algorithm. The second part of the paper deals with hardness results. Starting from an artificial quadratic-time solvable variation of the k-SAT problem, we will construct a graph of Karp reductions, proving that a truly subquadratic-time algorithm for any of the problems in the graph falsifies SETH. The analyzed problems are the following: computing the subset graph, finding dominating sets, computing the betweenness centrality of a vertex, computing the minimum closeness centrality, and computing the hyperbolicity of a pair of vertices. We will also be able to include in our framework three proofs already appeared in the literature, concerning the graph diameter computation, local alignment of strings and orthogonality of vectors.

Algebraic Properties of Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problem

Abstract: The paper presents an algebraic framework for optimization problems expressible as Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problems. Our results generalize the algebraic framework for the decision version (CSPs) provided by Bulatov et al. [SICOMP 2005]. We introduce the notions of weighted algebras and varieties and use the Galois connection due to Cohen et al. [SICOMP 2013] to link VCSP languages to weighted algebras. We show that the difficulty of VCSP depends only on the weighted variety generated by the associated weighted algebra. Paralleling the results for CSPs we exhibit a reduction to cores and rigid cores which allows us to focus on idempotent weighted varieties. Further, we propose an analogue of the Algebraic CSP Dichotomy Conjecture; prove the hardness direction and verify that it agrees with known results for VCSPs on two-element sets [Cohen et al. 2006], finite-valued VCSPs [Thapper and Zivny 2013] and conservative VCSPs [Kolmogorov and Zivny 2013].

Hardness of parameter estimation in graphical models

Abstract: We consider the problem of learning the canonical parameters specifying an undirected graphical model (Markov random field) from the mean parameters. For graphical models representing a minimal exponential family, the canonical parameters are uniquely determined by the mean parameters, so the problem is feasible in principle. The goal of this paper is to investigate the computational feasibility of this statistical task. Our main result shows that parameter estimation is in general intractable: no algorithm can learn the canonical parameters of a generic pair-wise binary graphical model from the mean parameters in time bounded by a polynomial in the number of variables (unless RP = NP). Indeed, such a result has been believed to be true (see the monograph by Wainwright and Jordan (2008)) but no proof was known. Our proof gives a polynomial time reduction from approximating the partition function of the hard-core model, known to be hard, to learning approximate parameters. Our reduction entails showing that the marginal polytope boundary has an inherent repulsive property, which validates an optimization procedure over the polytope that does not use any knowledge of its structure (as required by the ellipsoid method and others).

Algebraic Complexity Classes

Abstract: This survey describes, at an introductory level, the algebraic complexity framework originally proposed by Leslie Valiant in 1979, and some of the insights that have been obtained more recently.

Conservative constraint satisfaction re-revisited

Abstract: Conservative constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) constitute an important particular case of the general CSP, in which the allowed values of each variable can be restricted in an arbitrary way. Problems of this type are well studied for graph homomorphisms. A dichotomy theorem characterizing conservative CSPs solvable in polynomial time and proving that the remaining ones are NP-complete was proved by Bulatov in 2003. Its proof, however, is quite long and technical. A shorter proof of this result based on the absorbing subuniverses technique was suggested by Barto in 2011. In this paper we give a short elementary prove of the dichotomy theorem for the conservative CSP.

The Polyhedron-Hitting Problem

Abstract: We consider polyhedral versions of Kannan and Lipton's Orbit Problem (STOC '80 and JACM '86)---determining whether a target polyhedron V may be reached from a starting point x under repeated applications of a linear transformation A in an ambient vector space Q^m. In the context of program verification, very similar reachability questions were also considered and left open by Lee and Yannakakis in (STOC '92). We present what amounts to a complete characterisation of the decidability landscape for the Polyhedron-Hitting Problem, expressed as a function of the dimension m of the ambient space, together with the dimension of the polyhedral target V: more precisely, for each pair of dimensions, we either establish decidability, or show hardness for longstanding number-theoretic open problems.

Computational Complexity of Tensor Nuclear Norm.

Abstract: The main result of this paper shows that the weak membership problem in the unit ball of a given norm is NP-hard if and only if the weak membership problem in the unit ball of the dual norm is NP-hard. Equivalently, the approximation of a given norm is polynomial time if and only if the approximation of the dual norm is polynomial time. Using the NP-hardness of the approximation of the spectral norm of tensors we show that the approximation of the nuclear norm is NP-hard. We relate our results to bipartite separable states in quantum mechanics.

Variable Selection is Hard

Abstract: Variable selection for sparse linear regression is the problem of finding, given an m x p matrix B and a target vector y, a sparse vector x such that Bx approximately equals y. Assuming a standard complexity hypothesis, we show that no polynomial-time algorithm can find a k'-sparse x with ||Bx-y||^2 0, C_1>0,C_2>0 are arbitrary. This is true even under the promise that there is an unknown k-sparse vector x^* satisfying Bx^*=y. We prove a similar result for a statistical version of the problem in which the data are corrupted by noise. To the authors' knowledge, these are the first hardness results for sparse regression that apply when the algorithm simultaneously has k'>k and h(m,p)>0.

Bejeweled, Candy Crush and other Match-Three Games are (NP-)Hard

Abstract: The twentieth century has seen the rise of a new type of video games targeted at a mass audience of "casual" gamers. Many of these games require the player to swap items in order to form matches of three and are collectively known as \emph{tile-matching match-three games}. Among these, the most influential one is arguably \emph{Bejeweled} in which the matched items (gems) pop and the above gems fall in their place. Bejeweled has been ported to many different platforms and influenced an incredible number of similar games. Very recently one of them, named \emph{Candy Crush Saga} enjoyed a huge popularity and quickly went viral on social networks. We generalize this kind of games by only parameterizing the size of the board, while all the other elements (such as the rules or the number of gems) remain unchanged. Then, we prove that answering many natural questions regarding such games is actually \NP-Hard. These questions include determining if the player can reach a certain score, play for a certain number of turns, and others. We also \href{this http URL}{provide} a playable web-based implementation of our reduction.

Hardness of robust graph isomorphism, Lasserre gaps, and asymmetry of random graphs

Abstract: Building on work of Cai, Furer, and Immerman \cite{CFI92}, we show two hardness results for the Graph Isomorphism problem. First, we show that there are pairs of nonisomorphic $n$-vertex graphs $G$ and $H$ such that any sum-of-squares (SOS) proof of nonisomorphism requires degree $\Omega(n)$. In other words, we show an $\Omega(n)$-round integrality gap for the Lasserre SDP relaxation. In fact, we show this for pairs $G$ and $H$ which are not even $(1-10^{-14})$-isomorphic. (Here we say that two $n$-vertex, $m$-edge graphs $G$ and $H$ are $\alpha$-isomorphic if there is a bijection between their vertices which preserves at least $\alpha m$ edges.) Our second result is that under the {\sc R3XOR} Hypothesis \cite{Fei02} (and also any of a class of hypotheses which generalize the {\sc R3XOR} Hypothesis), the \emph{robust} Graph Isomorphism problem is hard. I.e.\ for every $\epsilon > 0$, there is no efficient algorithm which can distinguish graph pairs which are $(1-\epsilon)$-isomorphic from pairs which are not even $(1-\epsilon_0)$-isomorphic for some universal constant $\epsilon_0$. Along the way we prove a robust asymmetry result for random graphs and hypergraphs which may be of independent interest.

AC-Feasibility on Tree Networks is NP-Hard

Abstract: Recent years have witnessed significant interest in convex relaxations of the power flows, several papers showing that the second-order cone relaxation is tight for tree networks under various conditions on loads or voltages. This paper shows that AC-feasibility, i.e., to find whether some generator dispatch can satisfy a given demand, is NP-Hard for tree networks.

New algorithms and lower bounds for monotonicity testing

Abstract: We consider the problem of testing whether an unknown Boolean function $f$ is monotone versus $\epsilon$-far from every monotone function. The two main results of this paper are a new lower bound and a new algorithm for this well-studied problem. Lower bound: We prove an $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{1/5})$ lower bound on the query complexity of any non-adaptive two-sided error algorithm for testing whether an unknown Boolean function $f$ is monotone versus constant-far from monotone. This gives an exponential improvement on the previous lower bound of $\Omega(\log n)$ due to Fischer et al. [FLN+02]. We show that the same lower bound holds for monotonicity testing of Boolean-valued functions over hypergrid domains $\{1,\ldots,m\}^n$ for all $m\ge 2$. Upper bound: We give an $\tilde{O}(n^{5/6})\text{poly}(1/\epsilon)$-query algorithm that tests whether an unknown Boolean function $f$ is monotone versus $\epsilon$-far from monotone. Our algorithm, which is non-adaptive and makes one-sided error, is a modified version of the algorithm of Chakrabarty and Seshadhri [CS13a], which makes $\tilde{O}(n^{7/8})\text{poly}(1/\epsilon)$ queries.

A New Perspective on the Windows Scheduling Problem

Abstract: The Windows Scheduling Problem, also known as the Pinwheel Problem, is to schedule periodic jobs subject to their processing frequency demands. Instances are given as a set of jobs that have to be processed infinitely often such that the time interval between two consecutive executions of the same job j is no longer than the job's given period $p_j$. The key contribution of this work is a new interpretation of the problem variant with exact periods, where the time interval between consecutive executions must be strictly $p_j$. We show that this version is equivalent to a natural combinatorial problem we call Partial Coding. Reductions in both directions can be realized in polynomial time, so that both hardness proofs and algorithms for Partial Coding transfer to Windows Scheduling. Applying this new perspective, we obtain a number of new results regarding the computational complexity of various Windows Scheduling Problem variants. We prove that even the case of one processor and unit-length jobs does not admit a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm unless SAT can be solved by a randomized method in expected quasi-polynomial time. This result also extends to the case of inexact periods, which answers a question that has remained open for more than two decades. Furthermore, we report an error found in a hardness proof previously given for the multi-machine case without machine migration, and we show that this variant reduces to the single-machine case. Finally, we prove that even with unit-length jobs the problem is co-NP-hard when jobs are allowed to migrate between machines.

A quadratically tight partition bound for classical communication complexity and query complexity.

Abstract: In this work we introduce, both for classical communication complexity and query complexity, a modification of the 'partition bound' introduced by Jain and Klauck [2010]. We call it the 'public-coin partition bound'. We show that (the logarithm to the base two of) its communication complexity and query complexity versions form, for all relations, a quadratically tight lower bound on the public-coin randomized communication complexity and randomized query complexity respectively.

Zig-Zag Numberlink is NP-Complete

Abstract: When can $t$ terminal pairs in an $m \times n$ grid be connected by $t$ vertex-disjoint paths that cover all vertices of the grid? We prove that this problem is NP-complete. Our hardness result can be compared to two previous NP-hardness proofs: Lynch's 1975 proof without the ``cover all vertices'' constraint, and Kotsuma and Takenaga's 2010 proof when the paths are restricted to have the fewest possible corners within their homotopy class. The latter restriction is a common form of the famous Nikoli puzzle \emph{Numberlink}; our problem is another common form of Numberlink, sometimes called \emph{Zig-Zag Numberlink} and popularized by the smartphone app \emph{Flow Free}.

Candy Crush is NP-hard

Abstract: We prove that playing Candy Crush to achieve a given score in a fixed number of swaps is NP-hard.

Lower bounds on the size of semidefinite programming relaxations

Abstract: We introduce a method for proving lower bounds on the efficacy of semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxations for combinatorial problems. In particular, we show that the cut, TSP, and stable set polytopes on $n$-vertex graphs are not the linear image of the feasible region of any SDP (i.e., any spectrahedron) of dimension less than $2^{n^c}$, for some constant $c > 0$. This result yields the first super-polynomial lower bounds on the semidefinite extension complexity of any explicit family of polytopes. Our results follow from a general technique for proving lower bounds on the positive semidefinite rank of a matrix. To this end, we establish a close connection between arbitrary SDPs and those arising from the sum-of-squares SDP hierarchy. For approximating maximum constraint satisfaction problems, we prove that SDPs of polynomial-size are equivalent in power to those arising from degree-$O(1)$ sum-of-squares relaxations. This result implies, for instance, that no family of polynomial-size SDP relaxations can achieve better than a 7/8-approximation for MAX-3-SAT.