scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

A survey of socially interactive robots

TLDR
The context for socially interactive robots is discussed, emphasizing the relationship to other research fields and the different forms of “social robots”, and a taxonomy of design methods and system components used to build socially interactive Robots is presented.
About
This article is published in Robotics and Autonomous Systems.The article was published on 2003-03-31 and is currently open access. It has received 2869 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Media Lab Europe's social robots & Human–robot interaction.

read more

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

GeoNet: Unsupervised Learning of Dense Depth, Optical Flow and Camera Pose

TL;DR: An adaptive geometric consistency loss is proposed to increase robustness towards outliers and non-Lambertian regions, which resolves occlusions and texture ambiguities effectively and achieves state-of-the-art results in all of the three tasks, performing better than previously unsupervised methods and comparably with supervised ones.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developmental robotics: a survey

TL;DR: This paper elucidates the main reasons and key motivations behind the convergence of fields with seemingly disparate interests, and shows why developmental robotics might prove to be beneficial for all fields involved.
Journal ArticleDOI

Human-aware robot navigation: A survey

TL;DR: This paper provides a survey of existing approaches to human-aware navigation and offers a general classification scheme for the presented methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics

TL;DR: The article presents a synopsis of the major HRI issues in reducing the number of humans it takes to control a robot, maintaining performance with geographically distributed teams with intermittent communications, and encouraging acceptance within the existing social structure.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of the applicability of robots in education

TL;DR: A review of the field of robots in education can be found in this paper, where several prior ventures in the area are discussed (post-2000) with the help of classification criteria including domain of the learning activity, location of the activity, role of the robot, types of robots and types of robotic behaviour.
References
More filters
Book

The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals

TL;DR: The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals Introduction to the First Edition and Discussion Index, by Phillip Prodger and Paul Ekman.
Book

Fundamentals of speech recognition

TL;DR: This book presents a meta-modelling framework for speech recognition that automates the very labor-intensive and therefore time-heavy and therefore expensive and expensive process of manually modeling speech.
BookDOI

Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems

TL;DR: This chapter discusses Ant Foraging Behavior, Combinatorial Optimization, and Routing in Communications Networks, and its application to Data Analysis and Graph Partitioning.
Book

The Cognitive Structure of Emotions

TL;DR: In this paper, a cognitive theory of emotion is proposed, which describes the organization of emotion types and the implications of the emotions-as-valenced-reactions claim, and the boundaries of the theory Emotion words and cross-cultural issues.
Book

The Intentional Stance

TL;DR: The Intentional Stance as discussed by the authors is the first full-scale presentation of a theory of intentionality that has been developed for almost twenty years, and it can be seen as a pre-emptive strategy of interpretation that presupposes the rationality of the people or other entities we are hoping to understand and predict.
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "A survey of socially interactive robots: concepts, design, and applications" ?

This report reviews “ socially interactive robots ”: robots for which social human-robot interaction is important. The authors begin by discussing the context for socially interactive robots, emphasizing the relationship to other research fields and the different forms of “ social robots ”. The authors then present a taxonomy of design methods and system components used to build socially interactive robots. Following this taxonomy, the authors survey the current state of the art, categorized by use and application area. Finally, the authors describe the impact of these these robots on humans and discuss open issues. An abbreviated version of this report, which does not contain the application survey, is available as [ T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, K. Dautenhahn, A survey of socially interactive robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 

Given that the authors expect social robots to play increasingly larger roles in daily life, there is a strong need for field studies to examine how people behave when robots are introduced into their activities. 

Others important advantages are:• Robots can provide a stimulating and motivating influence that make living conditions or particular treatments more pleasant and endurable, an effect that has particular potential for children or elderly people. 

The measures consist of: scales for rating anthropomorphic and mechanistic dimensions; measures of model richness or certainty; and measures of compliance with a robot’s requests. 

Following their ethic of task-based and contextbased design, Severinson-Eklundh et al. identified two critical communicative needs of a fetch-andcarry robot. 

The creation of compelling anthropomorphic robots is a massive engineering challenge; yet, in the case of both Sony and Honda it is clear that the single largest hurdle involved actuation. 

Through such empowerment, fear or shyness towards technology can be transformed dramatically into interest in exploring technology and even altering its course. 

Aoki et al. contend that studies of rat-like robots will lead to better understanding of human behavior, in the same manner that animal experimentation (especially on rats) does. 

They contend that directed instruction, whereby a human teaches a robot using a carefully engineered feedback and reward mechanism, is constraining and ultimately unable to scale. 

In part, the argument is that in order for a robot to interact with humans as humans do (through gaze, gesture, vocalization, etc.), it must be structurally and functionally similar to a human. 

There is reason to believe that if a robot had a compelling personality, people would be more willing to interact with it and to establish a relationship with it[27,116]. 

Although human-robot communication can occur in many different ways, the authors consider there to be three primary types of dialogue: low-level (pre-linguistic), non-verbal, and natural language.