scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted ContentDOI

An anaphase surveillance mechanism prevents micronuclei formation from mitotic errors

TLDR
In this article, the authors show that Aurora B kinase mediates a surveillance mechanism that integrates error correction during anaphase with spatial control of nuclear envelope reformation to protect against micronuclei formation during human cell division.
Abstract
Summary Micronuclei are a hallmark of cancer and other human disorders and have recently been implicated in chromothripsis, a series of massive genomic rearrangements that may drive tumor evolution and progression. Here we show that Aurora B kinase mediates a surveillance mechanism that integrates error correction during anaphase with spatial control of nuclear envelope reformation to protect against micronuclei formation during human cell division. Using high-resolution live-cell imaging of human cancer and non-cancer cells we found that anaphase lagging chromosomes are often transient and rarely formed micronuclei. This strong bias against micronuclei formation relied on a midzone-based Aurora B phosphorylation gradient that assisted the mechanical transduction of spindle forces at the kinetochore-microtubule interface required for anaphase error correction, while delaying nuclear envelope reformation on lagging chromosomes, independently of microtubules. Our results uncover a new layer of protection against genomic instability and provide a strategy for the rational design of micronuclei-targeting therapies.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

1
An anaphase surveillance mechanism prevents micronuclei formation
from mitotic errors
Bernardo Orr
1,2
, Filipe De Sousa
1,2,
, Ana Margarida Gomes
1,2
, Luísa T. Ferreira
1,2
, Ana
C. Figueiredo
1,2
and Helder Maiato
1,2,3,*
5
1
Chromosome Instability & Dynamics Group, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação
em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
2
Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen
208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal 10
3
Cell Division Group, Experimental Biology Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Faculdade
de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto,
Portugal
†Current address: Radiation Oncology Division, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG),
Avenue de la Roseraie 53, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland 15
*Correspondence to: maiato@i3s.up.pt
Keywords: mitosis, micronuclei, Aurora B, gradient, error correction, nuclear envelope,
chromosome separation checkpoint, anaphase, phosphorylation 20
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted February 26, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.26.433009doi: bioRxiv preprint

2
Summary
Micronuclei are a hallmark of cancer and other human disorders and have recently been
implicated in chromothripsis, a series of massive genomic rearrangements that may
drive tumor evolution and progression. Here we show that Aurora B kinase mediates a
surveillance mechanism that integrates error correction during anaphase with spatial 5
control of nuclear envelope reformation to protect against micronuclei formation during
human cell division. Using high-resolution live-cell imaging of human cancer and non-
cancer cells we found that anaphase lagging chromosomes are often transient and
rarely formed micronuclei. This strong bias against micronuclei formation relied on a
midzone-based Aurora B phosphorylation gradient that assisted the mechanical 10
transduction of spindle forces at the kinetochore-microtubule interface required for
anaphase error correction, while delaying nuclear envelope reformation on lagging
chromosomes, independently of microtubules. Our results uncover a new layer of
protection against genomic instability and provide a strategy for the rational design of
micronuclei-targeting therapies. 15
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted February 26, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.26.433009doi: bioRxiv preprint

3
Introduction
Micronuclei (MN) are small sized nuclei derived from chromosomes or chromosome
fragments that fail to incorporate into daughter nuclei during cell division (Guo et al.,
2019). MN formation is a widely used biomarker of cancer and inflammation, as well as
several metabolic, reproductive, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders 5
(Fenech et al., 2020). Recently, MN derived from chromosome segregation errors have
drawn exceptional attention due to their causal link with chromothripsis, a series of
massive genomic rearrangements that may drive rapid tumor evolution and account for
acquired drug resistance and oncogene activation (Crasta et al., 2012; Ly and
Cleveland, 2017; Shoshani et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2015). Chromosome segregation 10
errors during mitosis are normally prevented before anaphase by a correction
mechanism involving the kinase activity of the Chromosomal Passenger Protein (CPC)
Aurora B at centromeres (Lampson and Grishchuk, 2017), under surveillance of the
spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) that monitors the establishment of kinetochore-
microtubule (KT-MT) attachments (Musacchio, 2015). Despite this, between 0.1-10% of 15
human primary/non-transformed or chromosomally stable cancer cells progress into
anaphase with one or few chromosomes lagging behind due to merotelic attachments
(Bakhoum et al., 2014; Cimini et al., 2002; Thompson and Compton, 2011; Worrall et
al., 2018). Merotelic attachments, in which a single KT is attached to MTs from both
spindle poles (Cimini et al., 2001), evade SAC detection and the resulting lagging 20
chromosomes in anaphase constitute a potential source of MN (Crasta et al., 2012).
However, whether anaphase lagging chromosomes inevitably result in MN remains
controversial, with frequencies ranging from 18-78% reported in the literature (Cohen-
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted February 26, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.26.433009doi: bioRxiv preprint

4
Sharir et al., 2021; Fonseca et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2012; Thompson and Compton,
2011; Worrall et al., 2018). Importantly, despite that chromosomal instability (CIN) is a
hallmark of human cancers (Bakhoum and Cantley, 2018; Hanahan and Weinberg,
2000), MN prevalence in both cancer and non-cancer cells is relatively infrequent
(typically less than 5-10% of the cells) (Bonassi et al., 2011; Jdey et al., 2017), even 5
after induction of massive chromosome segregation errors by experimental abrogation
of the SAC (Cohen-Sharir et al., 2021), implying the existence of surveillance
mechanisms that either prevent MN formation from SAC-invisible mitotic errors or
account for the clearance of micronucleated cells. While mechanisms of MN prevention
from mitotic errors remain unknown, clearance of micronucleated cells involves a p53-10
dependent mechanism that causes cell cycle arrest/apoptosis (Fonseca et al., 2019;
Janssen et al., 2011; Sablina et al., 1998; Thompson and Compton, 2010) and an
innate immune response mediated by cGAS-STING, which is thought to sense cytosolic
DNA on MN with ruptured nuclear envelopes (NEs) (Mackenzie et al., 2017; Santaguida
et al., 2017). Given their potential role in the genesis of MN and the respective 15
implications for human health, here we investigated how human cells deal with SAC-
invisible mitotic errors that result in anaphase lagging chromosomes. Our findings
uncover an active surveillance mechanism operating during anaphase that protects
against MN formation from mitotic errors.
20
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted February 26, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.26.433009doi: bioRxiv preprint

5
Results
Anaphase lagging chromosomes rarely form micronuclei
Many intrinsic factors may influence whether a lagging chromosome results in a MN.
This appears to vary among different chromosomes (Worrall et al., 2018) and depend
on their delay/position relative to the main segregating chromosome mass (Fonseca et 5
al., 2019) or the presence/absence of centromeres (Norppa and Falck, 2003). In
addition, external experimental factors, such as the spatiotemporal resolution of the
microscopy setup/analysis and sample size, may undermine our capacity to accurately
determine the fate of lagging chromosomes in living cells. To mitigate these external
limitations, we used 4D live-cell spinning-disk confocal microscopy covering the entire 10
chromosome set and the mitotic spindle, with 30 sec temporal resolution, to determine
the fate of anaphase lagging chromosomes in human cells. This allowed the
unequivocal identification of all lagging chromosomes, including those of highly transient
nature that normally resolve early in anaphase. We found that 9% of chromosomally
stable (non-transformed) RPE1 cells and 44% of chromosomally unstable (transformed) 15
U2OS cells displayed at least one transient lagging chromosome during anaphase (Fig.
1a, b; Fig. S1a; Movies S1-2). However, only 6% and 14% of the lagging chromosomes
in RPE1 and U2OS cells, respectively, resulted in MN (Fig. 1a, Fig. S1a, c; Movies S1-
2). Thus, lagging chromosomes in both transformed and non-transformed human cells
are often corrected during anaphase, and show a strong bias to re-integrate the main 20
nuclei.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted February 26, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.26.433009doi: bioRxiv preprint

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mitotic disassembly and reassembly of nuclear pore complexes.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors review recent progress on mitotic NPC disassembly and reassembly and highlight mechanistic insights into how NPCs are rapidly disintegrated into conveniently reusable building blocks, and put divergent models of (post-)mitotic NPC assembly into a spatial and temporal context.
Journal ArticleDOI

Back to the new beginning: Mitotic exit in space and time.

TL;DR: This review will discuss the main advances in the field that provided a better understanding on the key role of protein phosphorylation/de-phosphorylation in this transition together with the concept of their spatial regulation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Changing places: Chromosomal Passenger Complex relocation in early anaphase.

TL;DR: The Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) regulates a plethora of processes during multiple stages of nuclear and cytoplasmic division as mentioned in this paper, and is recruited to centromeres and kinetochores early during mitosis, and ensures that the duplicated chromosomes become properly connected to microtubules from opposite poles of the mitotic spindle.
Posted ContentDOI

Kinetochore life histories reveal the origins of chromosome mis-segregation and correction mechanisms

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors combine lattice light sheet microscopy, endogenous protein labelling and computational analysis to define the life history of > 104 kinetochores throughout metaphase and anaphase from over 200 cells and reveal that chromosomes are at a considerable and continual risk of mis-segregation.
Posted ContentDOI

The Aurora B gradient sustains kinetochore stability in anaphase

TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that although Aurora B leaves centromeres at anaphase, a gradient of Aurora B activity centred on the central spindle is still able to phosphorylate kinetochore substrates such as Dsn1 to modulate the stability of the kinets.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The hallmarks of cancer.

TL;DR: This work has been supported by the Department of the Army and the National Institutes of Health, and the author acknowledges the support and encouragement of the National Cancer Institute.
Journal ArticleDOI

Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events

TL;DR: It appears that some checkpoints are eliminated during the early embryonic development of some organisms; this fact may pose special problems for the fidelity of embryonic cell division.
Journal ArticleDOI

DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis

TL;DR: A mechanism by which errors in mitotic chromosome segregation generate DNA breaks via the formation of structures called micronuclei is identified, which potentially lead to mutations and chromosome rearrangements that can integrate into the genome.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Conserved KMN Network Constitutes the Core Microtubule-Binding Site of the Kinetochore

TL;DR: It is proposed that the conserved KNL-1/Mis12 complex/Ndc80 complex (KMN) network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore.
Journal ArticleDOI

cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity

TL;DR: It is reported that cGAS localizes to micronuclei arising from genome instability in a mouse model of monogenic autoinflammation, after exogenous DNA damage and spontaneously in human cancer cells, and it is established that interferon-stimulated gene expression is induced inmicronucleated cells, concluding that micronsuclei represent an important source of immunostimulatory DNA.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (1)
Q1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "An anaphase surveillance mechanism prevents micronuclei formation from mitotic errors" ?

In this paper, the authors used the spindle assembly checkpoint ( SAC ) that monitors the establishment of kinetochore-microtubule ( KT-MT ) attachments.