scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Are the effects of vegetation and soil changes as important as climate change impacts on hydrological processes

TLDR
In this paper, the response of mountain hydrology to vegetation/soil changes in the present and a future climate was modeled in three snowmelt-dominated mountain basins in the North American Cordillera.
Abstract
. Hydrological processes are widely understood to be sensitive to changes in climate, but the effects of concomitant changes in vegetation and soils have seldom been considered in snow-dominated mountain basins. The response of mountain hydrology to vegetation/soil changes in the present and a future climate was modeled in three snowmelt-dominated mountain basins in the North American Cordillera. The models developed for each basin using the Cold Regions Hydrological Modeling platform employed current and expected changes to vegetation and soil parameters and were driven with recent and perturbed high-altitude meteorological observations. Monthly perturbations were calculated using the differences in outputs between the present- and a future-climate scenario from 11 regional climate models. In the three basins, future climate change alone decreased the modeled peak snow water equivalent (SWE) by 11 %–47 % and increased the modeled evapotranspiration by 14 %–20 %. However, including future changes in vegetation and soil for each basin changed or reversed these climate change outcomes. In Wolf Creek in the Yukon Territory, Canada, a statistically insignificant increase in SWE due to vegetation increase in the alpine zone was found to offset the statistically significant decrease in SWE due to climate change. In Marmot Creek in the Canadian Rockies, the increase in annual runoff due to the combined effect of soil and climate change was statistically significant, whereas their individual effects were not. In the relatively warmer Reynolds Mountain in Idaho, USA, vegetation change alone decreased the annual runoff volume by 8 %, but changes in soil, climate, or both did not affect runoff. At high elevations in Wolf and Marmot creeks, the model results indicated that vegetation/soil changes moderated the impact of climate change on peak SWE, the timing of peak SWE, evapotranspiration, and the annual runoff volume. However, at medium elevations, these changes intensified the impact of climate change, further decreasing peak SWE and sublimation. The hydrological impacts of changes in climate, vegetation, and soil in mountain environments were similar in magnitude but not consistent in direction for all biomes; in some combinations, this resulted in enhanced impacts at lower elevations and latitudes and moderated impacts at higher elevations and latitudes.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Vegetation expansion in the subnival Hindu Kush Himalaya.

TL;DR: There has been a weakly positive increase in the extent of subnival vegetation since 1993, and strongest and most significant trends were found in the height region of 5,000–5,500 m a.s.l. across the HKH extent.
Journal ArticleDOI

Summary and synthesis of Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) research in the interior of western Canada – Part 2: Future change in cryosphere, vegetation, and hydrology

TL;DR: The Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) as mentioned in this paper was created to understand changes in cold-region process responses and interactions, along with their representation in most current generation land-surface and hydrological models.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evapotranspiration and energy partitioning across a forest-shrub vegetation gradient in a subarctic, alpine catchment

TL;DR: In this article, surface energy balance components and evapotranspiration dynamics at three sites along an elevational gradient in a subarctic, alpine catchment near Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada were evaluated.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas (excluding Antarctica) at a spatial resolution of 30 arc s (often referred to as 1-km spatial resolution).
Book ChapterDOI

Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods

TL;DR: The comparison of two treatments generally falls into one of the following two categories: (a) a number of replications for each of the two treatments, which are unpaired, or (b) we may have a series of paired comparisons, some of which may be positive and some negative as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that the limit distribution is normal if n, n$ go to infinity in any arbitrary manner, where n = m = 8 and n = n = 8.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit

TL;DR: In this paper, the maximum difference between an empirical and a hypothetical cumulative distribution is calculated, and confidence limits for a cumulative distribution are described, showing that the test is superior to the chi-square test.
Journal ArticleDOI

Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests

TL;DR: Interdisciplinary science that integrates knowledge of the many interacting climate services of forests with the impacts of global change is necessary to identify and understand as yet unexplored feedbacks in the Earth system and the potential of forests to mitigate climate change.
Related Papers (5)