scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Beliefs about medicines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison between patients of South Asian and White British origin

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
RA and SLE patients of South Asian origin have very high levels of concern about DMARDs and are generally worried about prescribed medicines, and further work is needed to understand the reasons underlying these beliefs.
Abstract
Objective. To assess whether patients with RA and SLE who are of South Asian origin have different beliefs about medicines in general, and about DMARDs in particular, compared with patients of White British/Irish origin. Methods. One hundred patients of South Asian origin (50 RA; 50 SLE) and 100 patients of White British/Irish origin (50 RA; 50 SLE) were recruited. Demographic and disease-related details and responses to the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), the SF-36 and the HAQ were collected. Results. Patients of South Asian origin had significantly higher General Overuse (GO), General Harm (GH) and Specific Concern (SC) scores compared with patients of White British/Irish origin. Forward stepwise multivariable regression analysis showed that ethnic origin was an independent predictor of the GO, GH and SC scores with patients of South Asian origin having higher scores in these three scales of the BMQ. Conclusion. RA and SLE patients of South Asian origin have very high levels of concern about DMARDs and are generally worried about prescribed medicines. This may have an impact on adherence in this group of patients and further work is needed to understand the reasons underlying these beliefs.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding Patients’ Adherence-Related Beliefs about Medicines Prescribed for Long-Term Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework

TL;DR: The Necessity-Concerns Framework is a useful conceptual model for understanding patients’ perspectives on prescribed medicines and could enhance the quality of prescribing by helping clinicians to engage patients in treatment decisions and support optimal adherence to appropriate prescriptions.

Medicines adherence: Involving patients in decisions about prescribed medicines and supporting adherence

TL;DR: Addressing non-adherence is not about getting patients to take more medicines per se, rather, it starts with an exploration of patients’ perspectives of medicines and the reasons why they may not want or are unable to use them.
Journal ArticleDOI

The global burden of SLE: prevalence, health disparities and socioeconomic impact

TL;DR: The global burden of systemic lupus erythematosus — in terms of incidence and prevalence, differential impact on populations, economic costs and capacity to compromise health-related quality of life — remains incompletely understood.
Journal ArticleDOI

Medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a critical appraisal of the existing literature.

TL;DR: Clinicians should be sensitive to patient’s personal beliefs that may impact medication adherence, as well as tackling practical barriers, to dramatically improve the efficacy of drug therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Adherence Estimator: a brief, proximal screener for patient propensity to adhere to prescription medications for chronic disease

TL;DR: Preliminary evidence of the validity of the Adherence Estimator supports its intended use to segment patients on their propensity to adhere to a newly-prescribed prescription medication.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

John E. Ware, +1 more
- 01 Jun 1992 - 
TL;DR: A 36-item short-form survey designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study is constructed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus

TL;DR: The 1971 preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were revised and updated to incorporate new immunologic knowledge and improve disease classification and showed gains in sensitivity and specificity.
Journal Article

Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

TL;DR: The Bulletin on the Rheumatic Diseases has published all of the classification criteria for the rheumatic diseases to date, and these new revised classified criteria for rheumatoid arthritis are very important as they should provide understanding of the possibly changing face of rheumatism.
Journal ArticleDOI

Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

TL;DR: The Bulletin on the Rheumatic Diseases has published all of the classification criteria for rheumatic diseases to date as mentioned in this paper, and these new revised classification criteria are very important as they should provide understanding of the possibly changing face of rheumatoid arthritis.
Related Papers (5)