Bioindication using trap-nesting bees and wasps and their natural enemies: community structure and interactions
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Results from four field studies show that communities of trap-nesting bees and wasps and their natural enemies are promising bioindicators for ecological change or habitat quality and species richness was closely correlated with that sampled by sweep nets.Abstract:
1. Results from four field studies show that communities of trap-nesting bees and wasps and their natural enemies are promising bioindicators for ecological change or habitat quality. These small and easy-to-handle communities can be analysed with respect to (i) species richness and related parameters, and (ii) ecological functions or interactions. The communities comprise Hymenoptera (Apidae, Sphecidae, Eumenidae, Pompilidae) and natural enemies belonging to many insect taxa. Traps consisted of 150–200, 15–20-cm long, reed internodes, put into tins or plastic tubes of 13–15 cm diameter; wooden posts with 2–10 of such reed-filled tins were exposed in the target habitat.
2. Species richness and abundance of bees (but not wasps) were closely related to plant species richness of the habitat, a measure of the bees’ food resource. However, availability of nest sites of above-ground nesting species was equally important: meadows with old trees supported greater populations than meadows without trees. A threefold increase in exposed traps resulted in a twofold increase in species.
3. The sensitivity of this bioindicator system profits from the fact that evaluations rely not only on presence/absence data, descriptive population attributes or diversity indices, but also on interactions or ecological functions. Monitoring ecological responses or multitrophic interactions, and their relationship to species diversity, is rarely done but much needed. Ecological functions include (i) the percentage mortality of trap-nesting bees and wasps due to parasitoids and predators, which was correlated with the species richness of these natural enemies; (ii) seed set of allogamous plants due to successful pollination by trap-nesting bees; and (iii) biological control by the predacious wasps.
4. With increasing isolation of fragmented habitats (when traps were exposed in a cleared agricultural landscape), both species richness of natural enemies and percentage mortality (parasitism and predation) declined significantly. In a comparison of habitat types (grasslands and field margins), species richness of the trap-nest community correlated with plant diversity, but percentage mortality, due to parasitism and predation, with field age only. The threshold distance to the nearest habitat was 106–530 m for a 10–50% decrease in mean mortality, and the mortality increased greatly in habitats that were older than 5 years. Accordingly, these studies emphasize the significance of a continuum of old habitat patches for the augmentation of natural enemies.
5. Exposure of standardized traps is an experimental approach with a small, interacting and reproducing community that can be easily characterized by simple parameters. Taxonomy and biology are well known, and quick evaluations can be done using the close correlation between the number of occupied traps and species richness. Species richness of trap-nesting bees and wasps was closely correlated with that sampled by sweep nets. Further criteria of indicator taxa that apply to this system are discussed in the text.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation
TL;DR: This work reviews the extensive literature on species responses to habitat fragmentation, and detail the numerous ways in which confounding factors have either masked the detection, or prevented the manifestation, of predicted fragmentation effects.
Journal ArticleDOI
Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control
TL;DR: It is concluded that diversified landscapes hold most potential for the conservation of biodiversity and sustaining the pest control function and similar contributions of these landscape factors suggest that all are equally important in enhancing natural enemy populations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change.
Claire Kremen,Neal M. Williams,Marcelo A. Aizen,Barbara Gemmill-Herren,Gretchen LeBuhn,Robert L. Minckley,Laurence Packer,Simon G. Potts,T'ai H. Roulston,Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter,Diego P. Vázquez,Rachael Winfree,Laurie Adams,Elizabeth E. Crone,Sarah S. Greenleaf,Timothy H. Keitt,Alexandra-Maria Klein,James Regetz,Taylor H. Ricketts +18 more
TL;DR: A conceptual model for exploring how one mobile-agent-based ecosystem service (MABES), pollination, is affected by land-use change, and then generalize the model to other MABES is developed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Foraging ranges of solitary bees
Achim Gathmann,Teja Tscharntke +1 more
TL;DR: These experiments showed that solitary bees have a rather small foraging range so local habitat structure appears to be of more importance than large-scale landscape structure, and all requirements for sustaining viable populations must be within this range.
Journal ArticleDOI
Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review.
TL;DR: Although the use of indicator species remains contentious, it can be useful if many species representing various taxa and lifehistories are included in the monitoring program and caution is applied when interpreting their population trends to distinguish actual signals from variations that may be unrelated to the deterioration of ecological integrity.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach
TL;DR: The three primay attributes of biodiversity recognized by Jerry Franklin are expanded into a nested hierarcby that incorporates ele- ments of each attribute at four levels of organization: re- gional landscape, community-ecosystem, population- species, andgenetic.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management
Norman L. Christensen,Ann M. Bartuska,James H. Brown,Stephen M Carpenter,Carla M. D'Antonio,Rober Francis,Jerry F. Franklin,James A. MacMahon,Reed F. Noss,David J. Parsons,Charles H. Peterson,Monica G. Turner,Robert G. Woodmansee +12 more
TL;DR: Ecosystem management is management driven by explicit goals, executed by policies, protocols, and practices, and made adaptable by monitoring and research based on our best understanding of the ecological interactions and processes necessary to sustain ecosystem composition, structure, and function as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the extent to which species-rich areas for different taxa coincide and whether rare species occur in, and therefore benefit from the conservation of, species rich habitats.