scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical Features Suggestive of Meningitis in Children: A Systematic Review of Prospective Data

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Evidence for several useful clinical features that influence the likelihood of pediatric meningitis exists.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Clinical diagnosis of pediatric meningitis is fundamental; therefore, familiarity with evidence underscoring clinical features suggestive of meningitis is important. OBJECTIVE: To seek evidence supporting accuracy of clinical features of pediatric bacterial meningitis. METHODS: A review of Medline, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, and PubMed was conducted for all articles of relevance. Articles contained prospective data of clinical features in children with laboratory-confirmed bacterial meningitis and in comparison groups of those without it. Two authors independently assessed quality and extracted data to calculate accuracy data of clinical features. RESULTS: Of 14 145 references initially identified, 10 met our inclusion criteria. On history, a report of bulging fontanel (likelihood ratio [LR]: 8.00 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4–26]), neck stiffness (7.70 [3.2–19]), seizures (outside febrile-convulsion age range) (4.40 [3.0–6.4]), or reduced feeds (2.00 [1.2–3.4]) raised concern about the presence of meningitis. On examination, jaundice (LR: 5.90 [95% CI: 1.8–19]), being toxic or moribund (5.80 [3.0–11]), meningeal signs (4.50 [2.4–8.3]), neck stiffness (4.00 [2.6–6.3]), bulging fontanel (3.50 [2.0–6.0]), Kernig sign (3.50 [2.1–5.7]), tone up (3.20 [2.2–4.5]), fever of >40°C (2.90 [1.6–5.5]), and Brudzinski sign (2.50 [1.8–3.6]) independently raised the likelihood of meningitis. The absence of meningeal signs (LR: 0.41 [95% CI: 0.30–0.57]) and an abnormal cry (0.30 [0.16–0.57]) independently lowered the likelihood of meningitis. The absence of fever did not rule out meningitis (LR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.53–0.92]). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for several useful clinical features that influence the likelihood of pediatric meningitis exists. No isolated clinical feature is diagnostic, and the most accurate diagnostic combination is unclear.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dilemmas in the diagnosis of acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis

TL;DR: The dilemmas in the diagnosis of acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis are reviewed, and the roles of clinical assessment and CSF examination are focused on.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical prediction model to aid emergency doctors managing febrile children at risk of serious bacterial infections: diagnostic study

TL;DR: A validated prediction model, including clinical signs, symptoms, and C reactive protein level, was useful for estimating the likelihood of pneumonia and other SBIs in children with fever, such as septicaemia/meningitis and urinary tract infections.
Journal ArticleDOI

Central Nervous System Infections

TL;DR: The changing pattern and epidemiology of a variety of common central nervous system infections, including meningitis, encephalitis, and brain abscesses are described and pathophysiology and the most current approach to clinical diagnosis, treatment, and disposition from the emergency physician perspective are reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI

A proposal for distinguishing between bacterial and viral meningitis using genetic programming and decision trees

TL;DR: This work considers two distinct cases of meningitis, and takes into account both blood and cerebrospinal parameters, resulting in rules and formulas applicable in clinical settings that achieve 100% of sensitivity in detecting a bacterial meneditis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

TL;DR: A new quantity is developed, I 2, which the authors believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta-analysis, which is susceptible to the number of trials included in the meta- analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews

TL;DR: In this article, an evidence-based quality assessment tool called QUADAS was proposed to assess the quality of primary studies of diagnostic accuracy, based on the results of three previously conducted reviews of the diagnostic literature.
Journal ArticleDOI

Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine.

TL;DR: It is argued that physicians in general underappreciate the likelihood that their diagnoses are wrong and that this tendency to overconfidence is related to both intrinsic and systemically reinforced factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Simplifying Likelihood Ratios

TL;DR: This article describes a simpler method of interpreting likelihood ratios, one that avoids calculators, nomograms, and conversions to “odds” of disease.
Related Papers (5)