Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Community Practice in the United States: A Cohort Study
Karla Kerlikowske,Rebecca A. Hubbard,Diana L. Miglioretti,Berta M. Geller,Bonnie C. Yankaskas,Constance D. Lehman,Stephen H. Taplin,Edward A. Sickles +7 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Overall, cancer detection with digital or film-screen mammography is similar in U.S. women aged 50 to 79 years undergoing screening mammography; women aged 40 to 49 years are more likely to have extremely dense breasts and estrogen receptor-negative tumors; if they are offered mammography screening, they may choose to undergo digital mammography to optimize cancer detection.Abstract:
Few studies have examined the comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in U.S. community practice. In a large sample of women screened in community settings, digital and ...read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society
Kevin C. Oeffinger,Elizabeth T. H. Fontham,Ruth Etzioni,Abbe Herzig,James S. Michaelson,Ya Chen Tina Shih,Louise C. Walter,Timothy R. Church,Christopher R. Flowers,Samuel J. LaMonte,Andrew M.D. Wolf,Carol DeSantis,Joannie Lortet-Tieulent,Kimberly S. Andrews,Deana Manassaram-Baptiste,Debbie Saslow,Robert A. Smith,Otis W. Brawley,Richard C. Wender +18 more
TL;DR: The updated ACS guidelines for breast cancer screening for women at average risk of breast cancer provide evidence-based recommendations and should be considered by physicians and women in discussions about breast cancer Screening.
Journal ArticleDOI
National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium
Constance D. Lehman,Robert F. Arao,Brian L. Sprague,Janie M. Lee,Diana S. M. Buist,Karla Kerlikowske,Louise M. Henderson,Tracy Onega,Anna N. A. Tosteson,Garth H. Rauscher,Diana L. Miglioretti +10 more
TL;DR: The majority of radiologists in the BCSC surpass cancer detection recommendations for screening mammography; however, AIRs continue to be higher than the recommended rate for almost half of radiologist interpreting screening mammograms.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cancer screening in the United States, 2014: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening
Robert A. Smith,Deana Manassaram-Baptiste,Durado Brooks,Vilma Cokkinides,Mary Doroshenk,Debbie Saslow,Richard C. Wender,Otis W. Brawley +7 more
TL;DR: The American Cancer Society published a summary of its guidelines for early cancer detection, a report on data and trends in cancer screening rates, and select issues related to cancer screening as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.
TL;DR: A review of current practice guidelines and additional sources of information will improve radiologists' understanding of the relevant subject of breast density and enable them to respond appropriately to questions from patients, clinicians, and the media.
Journal ArticleDOI
Breast Cancer: Conventional Diagnosis and Treatment Modalities and Recent Patents and Technologies.
Mohamed Ismail Nounou,Fatema ElAmrawy,Nada Ahmed,Kamilia Abdelraouf,Satyanarayana Goda,Hussaini Syed-Sha-Qhattal +5 more
TL;DR: An overview of breast cancer, conventional therapy, novel technologies in the management of Breast cancer, and rational approaches for targeting breast cancer is provided.
References
More filters
Book
Manual for Staging of Cancer
TL;DR: Part 1 General information on cancer staging and end-results reporting: purposes and principles of staging reporting of cancer survival and end results are explained.
Journal ArticleDOI
Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening
Etta D. Pisano,Constantine Gatsonis,Edward Hendrick,Martin J. Yaffe,Janet K. Baum,Suddhasatta Acharyya,Emily F. Conant,Laurie L. Fajardo,Lawrence W. Bassett,Roberta A. Jong,Murray Rebner +10 more
TL;DR: The overall diagnostic accuracy of digital and film mammography as a means of screening for breast cancer is similar, but digital mammography is more accurate in women under the age of 50 years, women with radiographically dense breasts, and premenopausal or perimenopausal women.
Journal ArticleDOI
Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.
Patricia A. Carney,Diana L. Miglioretti,Bonnie C. Yankaskas,Karla Kerlikowske,Robert D. Rosenberg,Carolyn M. Rutter,Berta M. Geller,Linn Abraham,Steven H. Taplin,Mark Dignan,Gary Cutter,Rachel Ballard-Barbash +11 more
TL;DR: The accuracy of screening mammography is best in older women and in women with fatty breasts, and the individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and HRT use on mammographic accuracy are examined.
Journal ArticleDOI
Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening
Etta D. Pisano,Constantine Gatsonis,Edward Hendrick,Martin J. Yaffe,Janet K. Baum,Suddhasatta Acharyya,Emily F. Conant,Laurie L. Fajardo,Lawrence W. Bassett,Carl J. D'Orsi,Roberta A. Jong,Murray Rebner +11 more
TL;DR: Digital mammography did, however, perform significantly better than the film method in women less than 50 years of age, in those having heterogeneously dense or very dense breasts, and premenopausal or perimenopausal women.
Journal ArticleDOI
Predictive margins with survey data.
Barry I. Graubard,Edward L. Korn +1 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that the textbook formula for the standard error of an adjusted treatment mean from the analysis of covariance may be inappropriate for applications involving survey data.