Cumulative Overall Resource Efficiency Assessment (COREA) for comparing bio-based products with their fossil-derived counterparts
Sophie Huysveld,Steven De Meester,Veerle Van linden,Hilde Muylle,Nico Peiren,Ludwig Lauwers,Jo Dewulf +6 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors proposed an accounting approach that includes the ancient solar energy consumption of fossil resources, and compared the resource efficiencies of the two bio-based products with their fossil-based counterparts.Abstract:
Bio-based products potentially decrease consumption of non-renewable fossil resources compared to their fossil-derived counterparts, but are more demanding for bio-productive land use. Although thermodynamics-based resource accounting methods are available for calculating overall resource efficiency from a life cycle perspective, their accounting for bio-productive land resources as an input during quantification of efficiencies is unclear. This paper aims to fill the gap in scientific literature about how to calculate a cumulative overall resource efficiency indicator by developing a framework, called Cumulative Overall Resource Efficiency Assessment (COREA). COREA (i) takes into account bio-productive land resources and (ii) addresses the non-renewable character of fossil resources. To account for bio-productive land resources, two methodological questions need to be addressed: (1) “how to define the system boundary of the solar energy input in the primary biomass production system?” and (2) “how to choose the temporal system boundary of this system?”. Resource efficiencies are calculated for three cases at crop level and two cases at bio-based product level. To account for the non-renewable character of fossil resources, we propose an accounting approach that includes the ancient solar energy consumption of fossil resources. This methodological choice is illustrated through comparing the resource efficiencies of the two bio-based products with their fossil-based counterparts. The results showed that the bio-based products only had a higher resource efficiency than their fossil-derived counterparts if fossil resources were considered as ancient consumers of solar energy.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation
TL;DR: In this article, the authors apply the stochastic frontier analysis on the impact of green technological innovation on natural resources utilization efficiency taking high-tech industries as the research object, and analyzes the influence factors of natural resources utilisation efficiency.
Journal ArticleDOI
Accounting for land use in life cycle assessment: The value of NPP as a proxy indicator to assess land use impacts on ecosystems.
TL;DR: Two indicators using net primary production (NPP) loss as a relevant proxy to primarily assess the impact of land use on ecosystem health are introduced and the advantages and limitations compared to state-of-the-art NPP-based land use indicators are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Resource efficiency of multifunctional wood cascade chains using LCA and exergy analysis, exemplified by a case study for Germany
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used exergy flow analysis to determine the resource consumption and resource efficiency of wood cascading compared to the use of primary wood to provide the same multiple functions.
Journal ArticleDOI
A review of the traditional pulping methods and the recent improvements in the pulping processes
TL;DR: The use of semi-chemical pulping is reported as an effective way of overcoming the disadvantages of the mechanical pulping process as discussed by the authors, and challenges and prospects of the improvements in pulping processes are highlighted.
Journal ArticleDOI
To what extent is climate change adaptation a novel challenge for agricultural modellers
Richard P. Kipling,C. F. E. Topp,André Bannink,Dave J. Bartley,Isabel Blanco-Penedo,Raffaele Cortignani,A. del Prado,Gabriele Dono,Philippe Faverdin,Anne-Isabelle Graux,Nicholas J. Hutchings,Ludwig Lauwers,Ş. Özkan Gülzari,Ş. Özkan Gülzari,Pytrik Reidsma,Susanne Rolinski,Margarita Ruiz-Ramos,Daniel L. Sandars,Renáta Sándor,Martin Schönhart,Giovanna Seddaiu,J.C. van Middelkoop,Shailesh Shrestha,Isabelle Weindl,Isabelle Weindl,Vera Eory +25 more
TL;DR: Qualitative analysis of modellers’ views revealed three categories of challenge: Content, Use, and Capacity, which were refined through literature review and focused attention on how the progressive nature of CC affects the role and impact of modelling.
References
More filters
Book
Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards
TL;DR: The Guide to LCA is a guide to the management of LCA projects: procedures and guiding principles for the present Guide, which aims to clarify goal and scope definition, impact assessment, and interpretation.
Book
Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical and Metallurgical Processes
TL;DR: In this paper, the exergetic efficiency of thermal, chemical, and metallurgical processes is analyzed and the application of the exergy concept to the problem of the economical optimization of complex plants and the implications to the environment of pollution due to external exergy losses.
Journal ArticleDOI
IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology
Olivier Jolliet,Manuele Margni,Raphaël Charles,Sebastien Humbert,Jérôme Payet,Gerald Rebitzer,Ralph K. Rosenbaum +6 more
TL;DR: The IMPACT 2002+ method as mentioned in this paper proposes a feasible implementation of a combined midpoint/damage approach, linking all types of life cycle inventory results (elementary flows and other interventions) via 14 midpoint categories to four damage categories.
Journal ArticleDOI
Improving Photosynthetic Efficiency for Greater Yield
TL;DR: Inefficiencies in photosynthetic energy transduction in crops from light interception to carbohydrate synthesis, and how classical breeding, systems biology, and synthetic biology are providing new opportunities to develop more productive germplasm are examined to more than double the yield potential of major crops.
Journal ArticleDOI
What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass
TL;DR: The potential efficiency of each step of the photosynthetic process from light capture to carbohydrate synthesis is examined, and it is revealed the maximum conversion efficiency of solar energy to biomass is 4.6% for C3 photosynthesis at 30 degrees C and today's 380 ppm atmospheric [CO2], but 6% forC4 photosynthesis.