Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The Quality Of Reporting Of Metaanalysis (QUOROMA) as discussed by the authors is a lista of comprobación for revistas, revisores, editores, and revistas en Medicina Clinica.Abstract:
En el ano 1999, despues de 3 anos de trabajo, se publico la declaracion QUOROM, cuyo objetivo era establecer unas normas para mejorar la calidad de la presentacion de los metaanalisis de ensayos clinicos aleatorizados. Se publico un comentario de este documento en un monografico sobre listas de comprobacion para autores, revisores y editores de revistas medicas en Medicina Clinica. En resumen, la declaracion Quality Of Reporting Of Metaanalysis (QUOROM) incluye una lista de comprobacion estructurada con 18 items que los autores de un metaanalisis, y tambien los editores de revistas, deberian considerar a la hora de publicar su trabajo en forma de articulo en una revista medica. Ademas, incluye un diagrama de flujo que describe todo el proceso, desde la identificacion inicial de los estudios potencialmente relevantes hasta la seleccion definitiva de estos. La finalidad de QUOROM era animar a los autores a que proporcionaran toda aquella informacion que resulta esencial para interpretar y utilizar adecuadamente los resultados de un metaanalisis. Numerosos estudios realizados con posterioridad a la publicacion de QUOROM han mostrado que la calidad de los metaanalisis publicados en revistas medicas todavia es deficiente. A pesar de esto, y a diferencia de otras iniciativas similares como CONSORT (dirigida a ensayos clinicos), la declaracion QUOROM no pareceread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Efficacy of Dietary Interventions for Inducing Histologic Remission in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
TL;DR: Dietary interventions are effective in producing histologic remission in patients with EoE, and Elemental diets and SFEDs were the most effective, achieving <15 eosinophils/high-power field in 90.8% and 72.1% of patients, respectively.
Journal ArticleDOI
La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA
TL;DR: This poster aims to demonstrate the efforts towards in-situ applicability of EMMARM, as well as the potential for international co-operation, that is, between the United States and Spain, to promote and protect against infectious disease.
Journal ArticleDOI
Relation between eosinophilic esophagitis and oral immunotherapy for food allergy: a systematic review with meta-analysis
TL;DR: The limited data on the utility of allergen immunotherapy as a therapy for EoE prevent a recommendation for this treatment option.
Journal ArticleDOI
Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitor Drugs for Inducing Clinical and Histologic Remission in Patients With Symptomatic Esophageal Eosinophilia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
TL;DR: PPI therapy induces clinicohistologic remission in half of patients with symptomatic esophageal eosinophilia, and this finding should be interpreted with caution because of poor-quality evidence, heterogeneity, and publication bias.
Journal ArticleDOI
Inflammatory Effects of High and Moderate Intensity Exercise-A Systematic Review.
TL;DR: Intense long exercise can lead, in general, to higher levels of inflammatory mediators, and thus might increase the risk of injury and chronic inflammation, in contrast, moderate exercise or vigorous exercise with appropriate resting periods can achieve maximum benefit.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati,Douglas G. Altman,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Peter C Gøtzsche,John P. A. Ioannidis,Mike Clarke,Mike Clarke,Philip J. Devereaux,Jos Kleijnen,David Moher +10 more
TL;DR: An Explanation and Elaboration of the PRISMA Statement is presented and updated guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Alessandro Liberati,Douglas G. Altman,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Peter C Gøtzsche,John P. A. Ioannidis,Mike Clarke,Philip J. Devereaux,Jos Kleijnen,David Moher +9 more
TL;DR: The meaning and rationale for each checklist item is explained, and an example of good reporting is included and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are included.
Journal ArticleDOI
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
TL;DR: This report hopes this report will generate further thought about ways to improve the quality of reports of meta-analyses of RCTs and that interested readers, reviewers, researchers, and editors will use the QUOROM statement and generate ideas for its improvement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews
David Moher,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Andrea C. Tricco,Andrea C. Tricco,Margaret Sampson,Douglas G. Altman +5 more
TL;DR: There were large differences between Cochrane reviews and non-Cochrane reviews in the quality of reporting several characteristics, and the view that readers should not accept SRs uncritically is substantiated.
Journal ArticleDOI
EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research
TL;DR: The EQUATOR network aims to become a global centre that provides resources and training, and which assists in the development, dissemination, and implementation of robust reporting guidelines, as well as finding potential solutions to improve the health-research literature.