scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA): defining remission and treatment success using the DAPSA score

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The DAPSA constitutes a disease-specific, validated and feasible tool for PsA assessment and provides criteria for disease activity states and treatment response, based on an international expert survey.
Abstract
Background The Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) is a valid and discriminative tool. Definitions of disease activity states and therapeutic response are still missing. We derived such criteria for the DAPSA. Methods We retrieved 30 patient profiles from an observational database including joint counts, patient pain and global activity ratings and C-reactive protein (CRP) and carried out a survey among experts to classify patients into remission (REM), low (LDA), moderate (MDA) or high (HDA) disease activity. Based on the distributions of DAPSA in each of these expert-assigned states we defined the cutpoints between groups. We performed similar analyses evaluating a clinical score (cDAPSA), omitting CRP. To define minor, moderate and major treatment response, we used Cohen9s Kappa statistics and analysed agreement of DAPSA percentage change with ACR20/50/70-response in three randomised controlled trials. Results Our survey yielded a response rate of 75% (n=33). Mean DAPSA differed significantly between patients classified as REM, LDA, MDA or HDA (p 4 and ≤14 for LDA, >14 and ≤28 for MDA and >28 for HDA. We observed best agreement with ACR20/50/70-response at DAPSA changes of 50/75/85%, reflecting minor, moderate and major improvement. Conclusions The DAPSA constitutes a disease-specific, validated and feasible tool for PsA assessment. In this study, we provide criteria for disease activity states and treatment response. They are based on an international expert survey, and show good performance in clinical trials and observational data.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force

TL;DR: There was broad agreement, now better supported by data than in 2012, that remission/inactive disease and, alternatively, low/minimal disease activity are the principal targets for the treatment of PsA.
Journal ArticleDOI

Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.

TL;DR: The 2018 ACR/NPF guideline as mentioned in this paper provides evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology.
Journal ArticleDOI

2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis

TL;DR: To develop an evidence‐based guideline for the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as a collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF).
Journal ArticleDOI

Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis/Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Consensus-Based Recommendations and Research Agenda for Use of Composite Measures and Treatment Targets in Psoriatic Arthritis.

TL;DR: A meeting was convened by the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) to further the development of consensus among physicians and patients regarding composite disease activity measures and targets in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts : development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

TL;DR: The Modified DAS that included 28-joint counts were able to discriminate between high and low disease activity (as indicated by clinical decisions of rheumatologists) and are as valid as disease activity scores that include more comprehensive joint counts.
Journal Article

A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index.

TL;DR: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), a self-administered instrument, is superior to the DAI in terms of construct and content validity and to the Enthesis Index in all aspects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome

TL;DR: It is important to note that patients included in recent drug trials resemble patients followed prospectively in a clinic, and patients with PsA who present with polyarticular disease are at risk for disease progression.
Journal ArticleDOI

Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score

TL;DR: A purely clinical score is a valid measure of disease activity and will have its greatest merits in clinical practice rather than research, where APRs are usually always available.
Related Papers (5)