scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Do smartphone usage scales predict behavior

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
It is concluded that existing self-report instruments are unlikely to be sensitive enough to accurately predict basic technology use related behaviors and conclusions regarding the psychological impact of technology are unreliable when relying solely on these measures to quantify typical usage.
Abstract
Understanding how people use technology remains important, particularly when measuring the impact this might have on individuals and society. However, despite a growing body of resources that can quantify smartphone use, research within psychology and social science overwhelmingly relies on self-reported assessments. These have yet to convincingly demonstrate an ability to predict objective behavior. Here, and for the first time, we compare a variety of smartphone use and ‘addiction’ scales with objective behaviors derived from Apple's Screen Time application. While correlations between psychometric scales and objective behavior are generally poor, single estimates and measures that attempt to frame technology use as habitual rather than ‘addictive’ correlate more favorably with subsequent behavior. We conclude that existing self-report instruments are unlikely to be sensitive enough to accurately predict basic technology use related behaviors. As a result, conclusions regarding the psychological impact of technology are unreliable when relying solely on these measures to quantify typical usage.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies

TL;DR: The research field needs to refocus on improving transparency, interpreting effect sizes and changing measurement, and show a greater appreciation for the individual differences that will inherently shape each adolescent’s reaction to digital technologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Discrepancies Between Logged and Self-Reported Digital Media Use

TL;DR: The authors conducted a meta-analysis of self-reported and log-based measures of media use and found that selfreported media use correlates only moderately with logged measurements, that self-reports were rarely an accurate reflection of logged media use, and that problematic media use showed an even weaker association with usage logs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Epidemiology of Internet Addiction

TL;DR: The results reveal that GIA may reflect a pattern of increasing human-machine interaction and be moderated by year, regions, types of scales, and sample representativeness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Are smartphones really that bad? Improving the psychological measurement of technology-related behaviors

TL;DR: It is argued that the latest generation of psychometric tools, which aim to assess smartphone usage, are unable to capture technology related experiences or behaviors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Young Adolescents’ Digital Technology Use and Mental Health Symptoms: Little Evidence of Longitudinal or Daily Linkages

TL;DR: Findings from this EMA study do not support the narrative that young adolescents’ digital technology usage is associated with elevated mental-health symptoms.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Possessions and the extended self.

TL;DR: In this paper, a variety of evidence is presented supporting this simple and compelling premise and implications for consumer behavior are derived for consumer behaviour because the construct of extended self involves consumer behavior rather than buyer behavior, it appears to be a much richer construct than previous formulations positing a relationship between selfconcept and consumer brand choice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss theoretical principles, practical issues, and pragmatic decisions to help developers maximize the construct validity of scales and subscales, and propose factor analysis as a crucial role in ensuring unidimensionality and discriminant validity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.

TL;DR: Two data sources--self-reports and peer ratings--and two instruments--adjective factors and questionnaire scales--were used to assess the five-factor model of personality, showing substantial cross-observer agreement on all five adjective factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?

TL;DR: The eclipse of behavior in personality and social psychology, in which direct observation of behavior has been increasingly supplanted by introspective self-reports, hypothetical scenarios, and questionnaire ratings, is discussed.
Related Papers (5)