Journal ArticleDOI
HYLIFE-II: A Molten-Salt Inertial Fusion Energy Power Plant Design — Final Report
Ralph W. Moir,R. L. Bieri,Xiang M. Chen,T. J. Dolan,M. A. Hoffman,P.A. House,R. L. Leber,J. D. Lee,Y. T. Lee,J. C. Liu,G. R. Longhurst,Wayne R. Meier,P. F. Peterson,Ronald W. Petzoldt,V. E. Schrock,M. Tobin,W. H. Williams +16 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the liquid-wall HYLIFE-II conceptual design has been presented, which has been shown to reduce the electricity cost by using a neutronically thick array of flowing molten-salt jets, which will not burn, has a low tritium solubility and inventory, and protects the chamber walls.Abstract:
Enhanced safety and performance improvements have been made to the liquid-wall HYLIFE reactor, yielding the current HYLIFE-II conceptual design. Liquid lithium has been replaced with a neutronically thick array of flowing molten-salt jets (Li[sub 2]BeF[sub 4] or Flibe), which will not burn, has a low tritium solubility and inventory, and protects the chamber walls, giving a robust design with a 30-yr lifetime. The tritium inventory is 0.5 g in the molten salt and 140 g in the metal of the tube walls, where it is less easily released. The 5-MJ driver is a recirculating induction accelerator estimated to cost $570 million (direct costs). Heavy-ion targets yield 350 MJ, six times per second, to produce 940 MW of electrical power for a cost of 6.5 cents/kW[center dot]h. Both larger and smaller yields are possible with correspondingly lower and higher pulse rates. When scaled up to 1934 MW (electric), the plant design has a calculated cost of electricity of 4.5 cents/kW[center dot]h. The design did not take into account potential improved plant availability and lower operations and maintenance costs compared with conventional power plant experience, resulting from the liquid wall protection. Such improvements would directly lower the electricity cost figures. For example,more » if the availability can be raised from the conservatively assumed 75% to 85% and the annual cost of component replacement, operations, and maintenance can be reduced from 6% to 3% of direct cost, the cost of electricity would drop to 5.0 and 3.9 cents/kW[center dot]h for 1- and 2-GW (electric) cases. 50 refs., 15 figs., 3 tabs.« lessread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Experimental study of MHD effects on turbulent flow of Flibe simulant fluid in circular pipe
Junichi Takeuchi,Shin-ichi Satake,Neil B. Morley,Tomoaki Kunugi,Takehiko Yokomine,Mohamed A. Abdou +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report experimental results on turbulent pipe flow of an aqueous potassium hydroxide solution under magnetic field using particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique.
Journal ArticleDOI
Liquid wall inertial fusion energy power plants
TL;DR: The idea of using liquid wall protection has been employed in a number of laser, light-ion, and heavy-ion designs, for example, BLASCON, HYLIFE-I, HIBALL, Libra-SP, Cascade, Osiris, HYLife-II and others as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Using magnetic levitation to produce cryogenic targets for inertial fusion energy: experiment and theory
Denis Chatain,Vadim Nikolayev +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present experimental and theoretical studies of magnetic levitation of hydrogen gas bubble surrounded by liquid hydrogen confined in a semi-transparent spherical shell of 3 mm internal diameter.
Journal ArticleDOI
Experimental investigation of turbulent heat transfer of high Prandtl number fluid flow under strong magnetic field
Takehiko Yokomine,J. Takeuchi,Hiroyuki Nakaharai,Shin-ichi Satake,Tomoaki Kunugi,Neil B. Morley,Mohamed A. Abdou +6 more
TL;DR: In this paper, an investigation of MHD effects on Flibe simulant fluid (aqueous potassium hydroxide solution) flows has been conducted under the U.S.-Japan JUPITER II collaboration program using "FLIHY" pipe flow facility at UCLA.
Journal ArticleDOI
HYLIFE-II reactor chamber design refinements
Abstract: Mechanical design features of the reactor chamber for the HYLIFE-II inertial confinement fusion power plant are presented. A combination of oscillating and steady, molten salt streams (Li{sub 2}BeF{sub 4}) are used for shielding and blast protection of the chamber walls. The system is designed for a 6 Hz repetition rate. Beam path clearing, between shots, is accomplished with the oscillating flow. The mechanism for generating the oscillating streams is described. A design configuration of the vessel wall allows adequate cooling and provides extra shielding to reduce thermal stresses to tolerable levels. The bottom portion of the reactor chamber is designed to minimize splash back of the high velocity (> 12 m/s) salt streams and also recover up to half of the dynamic head. Cost estimates for a 1 GWe and 2 GWe reactor chamber are presented.
References
More filters
ReportDOI
High-Yield Lithium-Injection Fusion-Energy (HYLIFE) reactor
TL;DR: The High-Yield Lithium-Injection Fusion Energy (HYLIFE) concept to convent inertial confinement fusion energy into electric power has undergone intensive research and refinement at LLNL since 1978 as discussed by the authors, focusing on the HYLIFE reaction chamber (which includes neutronics, liquid-metal jet-array hydrocynamics, and structural design), supporting systems, primary steam system and balance of plant, safety and environmental protection, and costs.
Journal ArticleDOI
Waste Disposal Assessment of HYLIFE-II Structure
TL;DR: The initial scoping analysis indicates that by using Type 304 stainless steel (SS), most of the vacuum vessel's structural mass in the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant conceptual design cou....
Journal ArticleDOI
HYLIFE-II Inertial Confinement Fusion Reactor Design
TL;DR: The HYLIFE-II inertial fusion power plant design study uses a liquid fall, in the form of jets to protect the first structural wall from neutron damage, x-rays, and blast to provide a 30-y lifetime.
Journal ArticleDOI
Hylife-II Inertial Fusion Energy Power Plant Design
TL;DR: In this article, an inertial fusion power plant design study uses a liquid fall, in the form of jets, to protect the first structural wall from neutron damage, x rays, and blast to provide a 30-y lifetime.
Journal ArticleDOI
Updated comparison of economics of fusion reactors with advanced fission reactors
TL;DR: In this article, the projected cost of electricity (COE) for fusion is compared with that from current and advanced nuclear fission and coal-fired plants, and the results show COEs of about 59--74 mills/kWh for the fusion designs considered.
Related Papers (5)
Osiris and SOMBRERO inertial fusion power plant designs–summary, conclusions, and recommendations
On the exploration of innovative concepts for fusion chamber technology
Mohamed A. Abdou,Alice Ying,Neil B. Morley,K. Gulec,Sergey Smolentsev,Mike Kotschenreuther,S. Malang,Steven J. Zinkle,T.D. Rognlien,P.J. Fogarty,B.E. Nelson,Richard E. Nygren,K. McCarthy,Mahmoud Z. Youssef,Nasr M. Ghoniem,D.K. Sze,C.P.C. Wong,Mohamed E. Sawan,H.Y. Khater,R. Woolley,Richard F. Mattas,Ralph W. Moir,Shahram Sharafat,Jeffrey N. Brooks,Ahmed Hassanein,David A. Petti,Mark S. Tillack,M.A. Ulrickson,Tetsuya Uchimoto +28 more