scispace - formally typeset
BookDOI

Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior

TLDR
In this paper, the authors present a theoretical analysis of cross-categorization effects in the psychological study of group cognition and behavior, and conclude that the importance of ego-centric beliefs in group perception and behavior can be traced back to the social-cognitive origins of group discrimination.
Abstract
Contents: C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, C.A. InskoIntroduction. Part I:Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior: Conceptual Issues. M. Schaller, M.C. Rosell, C.H. Asp, Parsimony and Pluralism in the Psychological Study of Intergroup Processes. D. Wilder, A.F. Simon, Categorical and Dynamic Groups: Implications for Social Perception and Intergroup Behavior. Part II:Interindividual Versus Intergroup Cognition and Behavior. D.L. Hamilton, S.J. Sherman, B. Lickel, Perceiving Social Groups: The Importance of the Entitativity Continuum. C.A. Insko, J. Schopler, Differential Distrust of Groups and Individuals. C.A. Insko, J. Schopler, C. Sedikides, Personal Control, Entitativity, and Evolution. Part III:Processes Affecting Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior: Perceptual and Judgmental Processes. P.W. Linville, G.W. Fischer, Group Variability and Covariation: Effects on Intergroup Judgment and Behavior. M. Biernat, T.K. Vescio, M. Manis, Judging and Behaving Toward Members of Stereotyped Groups: A Shifting Standards Perspective. B. Wittenbrink, B. Park, C.M. Judd, The Role of Stereotypic Knowledge in the Construal of Person Models. Part IV:Processes Affecting Intergroup Cognition and Behavior: Motivational and Social Processes. T. Clare, S.T. Fiske, A Systemic View of Behavioral Confirmation: Counterpoint to the Individualist View. R.M. Kramer, D.M. Messick, Getting By With a Little Help From Our Enemies: Collective Paranoia and Its Role in Intergroup Relations. B. Simon, Individuals, Groups, and Social Change: On the Relationship Between Individual and Collective Self-Interpretations and Collective Action. J.M. Levine, R.L. Moreland, C.S. Ryan, Group Socialization in Intergroup Relations. Part V:On the Reduction of Unwanted Intergroup Cognition and Behavior. G.V. Bodenhausen, C.N. Macrae, J. Garst, Stereotypes in Thought and Deed: Social-Cognitive Origins of Intergroup Discrimination. J.F. Dovidio, S.L. Gaertner, A.M. Isen, M. Rust, P. Guerra, Positive Affect, Cognition, and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias. M. Hewstone, C.G. Lord, Changing Intergroup Cognitions and Intergroup Behavior: The Role of Typicality. N. Miller, L.M. Urban, E.J. Vanman, A Theoretical Analysis of Crossed Social Categorization Effects. Part VI:Concluding Commentary. D.M. Mackie, E.R. Smith, Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior: Crossing the Boundaries.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo

TL;DR: This paper reviewed and integrated 10 years of research on 20 hypotheses derived from a system justification perspective, focusing on the phenomenon of implicit outgroup favoritism among members of disadvantaged groups (including African Americans, the elderly, and gays/lesbians) and its relation to political ideology.
Book ChapterDOI

Warmth and Competence As Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map

TL;DR: The stereotype content model (SCM) as mentioned in this paper defines two fundamental dimensions of social perception, warmth and competence, predicted respectively by perceived competition and status, which generate distinct emotions of admiration, contempt, envy, and pity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.

TL;DR: People who perceived the in-group as strong were more likely to experience anger toward the out-group and to desire to take action against it, and the effects of perceived in-groups strength on offensive action tendencies were mediated by anger.
Journal ArticleDOI

Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification

TL;DR: The authors identified 5 specific components of in-group identification and offered a hierarchical 2-dimensional model within which these components are organized, and demonstrated the construct validity and predictive and discriminant validity of these components.
Book ChapterDOI

An integrative theory of intergroup contact

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a re-presentation of Allport's classic contact hypothesis and show that many of his original propositions have capably withstood the test of time.