scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Outcomes Associated with In-Center Nocturnal Hemodialysis from a Large Multicenter Program

TLDR
Patients who were on INHD exhibited excellent quality indicators, with better survival and lower hospitalization rates, and the relative contributions of patient selection versus effect of therapy on outcomes remain to be elucidated in prospective clinical trials.
Abstract
Background and objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate epidemiology and outcomes of a large in-center nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD) program. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: This case-control study compared patients who were on thrice-weekly INHD from 56 Fresenius Medical Care, North America facilities with conventional hemodialysis patients from 244 facilities within the surrounding geographic area. All INHD cases and conventional hemodialysis control subjects who were active as of January 1, 2007, were followed until December 31, 2007, for evaluation of mortality and hospitalization. Results: As of January 1, 2007, 655 patients had been on INHD for 51 ± 73 d. Patients were younger, there were more male and black patients, and vintage was longer, but they had less diabetes compared with 15,334 control subjects. Unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.59 for mortality and 0.76 for hospitalization. After adjustment for case mix and access type, only hospitalization remained significant. Fewer INHD patients were hospitalized (48 versus 59%) with a normalized rate of 9.6 versus 13.5 hospital days per patient-year. INHD patients had greater interdialytic weight gains but lower BP. At baseline, hemoglobin values were similar, whereas albumin and phosphorus values favored INHD. Mean equilibrated Kt/V was higher in INHD patients related to longer treatment time, despite lower blood and dialysate flow rates. Conclusions: Patients who were on INHD exhibited excellent quality indicators, with better survival and lower hospitalization rates. The relative contributions of patient selection versus effect of therapy on outcomes remain to be elucidated in prospective clinical trials.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

More Dialysis Has Not Proven Much Better.

TL;DR: Patients maintained on standard three times weekly hemodialysis have a high mortality rate and a limited quality of life, and it is natural to suppose that their health could be improved by increasing the intensity of dialysis treatment, but evidence that such improvement can be obtained is generally lacking.
Journal ArticleDOI

Investigating the effects of 6 months extended duration, in-centre nocturnal versus conventional haemodialysis treatment: a non-randomised, controlled feasibility study.

TL;DR: This feasibility study aims to gather sufficient data on numerous outcome measures to inform the design of a multicentre randomised controlled trial that will establish the potential benefits of INHD and increase the availability of this service nationally and internationally.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Control of serum phosphate without any phosphate binders in patients treated with nocturnal hemodialysis

TL;DR: NHD is more effective in controlling serum phosphate levels than CHD, allowing patients to discontinue their phosphate binders completely and to ingest a more liberal diet.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Intensity of Hemodialysis and the Response to Erythropoietin in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

TL;DR: In patients with end-stage renal disease, inadequate hemodialysis is associated with a suboptimal response to erythropoietin therapy and increasing the intensity of dialysis in patients with anemia who are receiving inadequate dialysis results in a significant increase in the hematocrit.
Journal ArticleDOI

Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) randomized trials: study design.

TL;DR: The Frequent Hemodialysis Network Trials Group is conducting two multicenter randomized trials of 250 subjects each, comparing conventional three times weekly HD with (1) in-center daily HD and (2) home nocturnal HD, during which feasibility of randomization, ability to deliver the interventions, and adherence will be evaluated.
Related Papers (5)