scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Outcomes Associated with In-Center Nocturnal Hemodialysis from a Large Multicenter Program

TLDR
Patients who were on INHD exhibited excellent quality indicators, with better survival and lower hospitalization rates, and the relative contributions of patient selection versus effect of therapy on outcomes remain to be elucidated in prospective clinical trials.
Abstract
Background and objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate epidemiology and outcomes of a large in-center nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD) program. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: This case-control study compared patients who were on thrice-weekly INHD from 56 Fresenius Medical Care, North America facilities with conventional hemodialysis patients from 244 facilities within the surrounding geographic area. All INHD cases and conventional hemodialysis control subjects who were active as of January 1, 2007, were followed until December 31, 2007, for evaluation of mortality and hospitalization. Results: As of January 1, 2007, 655 patients had been on INHD for 51 ± 73 d. Patients were younger, there were more male and black patients, and vintage was longer, but they had less diabetes compared with 15,334 control subjects. Unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.59 for mortality and 0.76 for hospitalization. After adjustment for case mix and access type, only hospitalization remained significant. Fewer INHD patients were hospitalized (48 versus 59%) with a normalized rate of 9.6 versus 13.5 hospital days per patient-year. INHD patients had greater interdialytic weight gains but lower BP. At baseline, hemoglobin values were similar, whereas albumin and phosphorus values favored INHD. Mean equilibrated Kt/V was higher in INHD patients related to longer treatment time, despite lower blood and dialysate flow rates. Conclusions: Patients who were on INHD exhibited excellent quality indicators, with better survival and lower hospitalization rates. The relative contributions of patient selection versus effect of therapy on outcomes remain to be elucidated in prospective clinical trials.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Nocturnal, every-other-day, online haemodiafiltration: an effective therapeutic alternative

TL;DR: Nocturnal every-other-day OL-HDF could be an excellent therapeutic alternative since good tolerance and occupational rehabilitation, marked improvement in dialysis dose, nutritional status, LVH, phosphate and hypertension control and a substantial reduction in drug requirements were observed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of a sustained difference in hemodialytic clearance on the plasma levels of p-cresol sulfate and indoxyl sulfate.

TL;DR: It is suggested that an increase in PCS generation prevents plasma levels from falling when the dialytic clearance is increased, and suppression of solute generation may be required to reduce plasma PCS levels in dialysis patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hemodialysis treatment time: a fresh perspective.

TL;DR: It is suggested that a new treatment paradigm should consider a minimum adequate dialysis treatment time of 4 hours for the majority of patients, with anything shorter becoming the exception rather than the rule.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Control of serum phosphate without any phosphate binders in patients treated with nocturnal hemodialysis

TL;DR: NHD is more effective in controlling serum phosphate levels than CHD, allowing patients to discontinue their phosphate binders completely and to ingest a more liberal diet.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Intensity of Hemodialysis and the Response to Erythropoietin in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

TL;DR: In patients with end-stage renal disease, inadequate hemodialysis is associated with a suboptimal response to erythropoietin therapy and increasing the intensity of dialysis in patients with anemia who are receiving inadequate dialysis results in a significant increase in the hematocrit.
Journal ArticleDOI

Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) randomized trials: study design.

TL;DR: The Frequent Hemodialysis Network Trials Group is conducting two multicenter randomized trials of 250 subjects each, comparing conventional three times weekly HD with (1) in-center daily HD and (2) home nocturnal HD, during which feasibility of randomization, ability to deliver the interventions, and adherence will be evaluated.
Related Papers (5)