scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Physiology and ecology of the sulphate-reducing bacteria.

Glenn R. Gibson
- 01 Dec 1990 - 
- Vol. 69, Iss: 6, pp 769-797
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Any sulphur compound with an oxidation state above that of sulphide can potentially function as an electron acceptor for the oxidation of carbon substrates by biological processes and, during dissimilatory sulphate reduction, the sulphate ion is utilized as an oxidant for the degradation of organic material.
Abstract
All plants, animals and bacteria require sulphur for the synthesis of proteins. The biological transformation of sulphur in natural environments is a nutrient cycling process comprising both aerobic and anaerobic components (Postgate 1984). In its highest oxidation state, sulphur exists as the sulphate ion (SO:-) which is reduced to sulphide (Sz-) by most bacteria, fungi and plants before incorporation into amino acids. This process is termed assimilatory sulphate reduction and is purely a biosynthetic process. However, any sulphur compound with an oxidation state above that of sulphide ( 2) can potentially function as an electron acceptor for the oxidation of carbon substrates by biological processes (Goldhaber & Kaplan 1974). For example, during dissimilatory sulphate reduction, the sulphate ion is utilized as an oxidant for the degradation of organic material. An equivalent amount of sulphide is formed per mole of sulphate reduced (Berner 1974): 2CH,O + SO:-+ H,S + 2HCO;

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components

TL;DR: This review discusses the main gut microorganisms, particularly bacteria, and microbial pathways associated with the metabolism of dietary carbohydrates, proteins, plant polyphenols, bile acids, and vitamins, and the methodologies, existing and novel, that can be employed to explore gut microbial pathways of metabolism.
Journal ArticleDOI

Remediation technologies for heavy metal contaminated groundwater.

TL;DR: Thirty five approaches for groundwater treatment have been reviewed and classified under three large categories viz chemical, biochemical/biological/biosorption and physico-chemical treatment processes for a better understanding of each category.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sulfate‐reducing bacteria

TL;DR: In this paper, a review of sulfate reduction-induced problems in general and SBRs in particular is presented, with an emphasis on the competitive effects of methane-producing bacteria on SBR.
BookDOI

Sulfate-reducing bacteria

TL;DR: Characteristics and Activities of Sulfate-reducing Bacteria L.M. Tomei, and Molecular Biology of Redoxactive Metal Proteins from Desulfovibrio W.D. van Dongen.
Journal ArticleDOI

Anaerobic treatment of sulphate-containing waste streams

TL;DR: The factors governing competitive interactions between SRB and other anaerobes involved in methanogenesis is discussed in the context of literature data on sulphate wastewater treatment and with particular reference to laboratory and full-scale digestion of citric acid production wastewater.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria.

TL;DR: This article corrects the article on p. 100 in vol.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction

TL;DR: In this paper, a comparative survey of aerobic and anaerobic mineralization in the sea bed based on direct rate measurements of the two processes is presented, and the results demonstrate a surprisingly high contribution from the sulphate-reducers.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Phylogeny of Prokaryotes

TL;DR: For the first time, a single experimental approach, 16S ribosomal RNA sequence characterization, has been used to develop an overview of phylogenetic relationships in the bacterial world as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Sulfur Cycle

TL;DR: The authors' model of the sulfur cycle can draw some conclusions that man is now contributing about one half as much as nature to the total atmospheric burden of sulfur compounds, but by A.D. 2000 he will be contributing about as much, and in the Northern Hemisphere alone he is more than matching nature.