scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Predicting Breast Cancer by Applying Deep Learning to Linked Health Records and Mammograms.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The algorithm, which combined machine-learning and deep-learning approaches, can be applied to assess breast cancer at a level comparable to radiologists and has the potential to substantially reduce missed diagnoses of breast cancer.
Abstract
Background Computational models on the basis of deep neural networks are increasingly used to analyze health care data. However, the efficacy of traditional computational models in radiology is a matter of debate. Purpose To evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of a combined machine and deep learning approach for early breast cancer detection applied to a linked set of digital mammography images and electronic health records. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, 52 936 images were collected in 13 234 women who underwent at least one mammogram between 2013 and 2017, and who had health records for at least 1 year before undergoing mammography. The algorithm was trained on 9611 mammograms and health records of women to make two breast cancer predictions: to predict biopsy malignancy and to differentiate normal from abnormal screening examinations. The study estimated the association of features with outcomes by using t test and Fisher exact test. The model comparisons were performed with a 95% confidence interval (CI) or by using the DeLong test. Results The resulting algorithm was validated in 1055 women and tested in 2548 women (mean age, 55 years ± 10 [standard deviation]). In the test set, the algorithm identified 34 of 71 (48%) false-negative findings on mammograms. For the malignancy prediction objective, the algorithm obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.93), with specificity of 77.3% (95% CI: 69.2%, 85.4%) at a sensitivity of 87%. When trained on clinical data alone, the model performed significantly better than the Gail model (AUC, 0.78 vs 0.54, respectively; P < .004). Conclusion The algorithm, which combined machine-learning and deep-learning approaches, can be applied to assess breast cancer at a level comparable to radiologists and has the potential to substantially reduce missed diagnoses of breast cancer. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study

TL;DR: The AI algorithm developed with large-scale mammography data showed better diagnostic performance in breast cancer detection compared with radiologists and a significant improvement in radiologists' performance when aided by AI supports application of AI to mammograms as a diagnostic support tool.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms

Thomas Schaffter, +74 more
TL;DR: This diagnostic accuracy study evaluates whether artificial intelligence can overcome human mammography interpretation limits with a rigorous, unbiased evaluation of machine learning algorithms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Precision Medicine, AI, and the Future of Personalized Health Care

TL;DR: Translational research exploring the convergence of artificial intelligence and precision medicine will help solve the most difficult challenges facing precision medicine, especially those in which nongenomic and genomic determinants, combined with information from patient symptoms, clinical history, and lifestyles, will facilitate personalized diagnosis and prognostication.
Journal ArticleDOI

External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms

TL;DR: The results of this study indicated that a commercially available AI computer-aided detection algorithm can assess screening mammograms with a sufficient diagnostic performance to be further evaluated as an independent reader in prospective clinical trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inconsistent Performance of Deep Learning Models on Mammogram Classification.

TL;DR: The results demonstrate performance inconsistency across the data sets and models, indicating that the high performance of deep learning models on one data set cannot be readily transferred to unseen external data sets, and these models need further assessment and validation before being applied in clinical practice.
References
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System

TL;DR: XGBoost as discussed by the authors proposes a sparsity-aware algorithm for sparse data and weighted quantile sketch for approximate tree learning to achieve state-of-the-art results on many machine learning challenges.
Journal ArticleDOI

A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis

TL;DR: This paper reviews the major deep learning concepts pertinent to medical image analysis and summarizes over 300 contributions to the field, most of which appeared in the last year, to survey the use of deep learning for image classification, object detection, segmentation, registration, and other tasks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks

TL;DR: This work demonstrates an artificial intelligence capable of classifying skin cancer with a level of competence comparable to dermatologists, trained end-to-end from images directly, using only pixels and disease labels as inputs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Projecting Individualized Probabilities of Developing Breast Cancer for White Females Who Are Being Examined Annually

TL;DR: To assist in medical counseling, a method to estimate the chance that a woman with given age and risk factors will develop breast cancer over a specified interval is presented and individualized breast cancer probabilities are calculated.
Related Papers (5)