scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The PRESS 2015 Guideline Statement should help to guide and improve the peer review of electronic literature search strategies and suggested that structured PRESS could identify search errors and improved the selection of search terms.
About
This article is published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.The article was published on 2016-07-01 and is currently open access. It has received 2051 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Word search & Guideline.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

TL;DR: A PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was needed to provide reporting guidance for this specific type of knowledge synthesis and was developed according to published guidance by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research) Network for the development of reporting guidelines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.

TL;DR: The updated JBI guidance for scoping reviews includes additional guidance on several methodological issues, such as when a scoping review is (or is not) appropriate, and how to extract, analyze, and present results, and provides clarification for implications for practice and research.
Journal ArticleDOI

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.

TL;DR: The PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search extension) checklist as discussed by the authors was developed using a 3-stage Delphi survey process, followed by a consensus conference and public review process.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies

TL;DR: This evidence-based guideline facilitates the improvement of search quality through peer review, and thus the improvement in quality of systematic reviews, and is relevant for librarians/information specialists, journal editors, developers of knowledge translation tools, research organizations, and funding bodies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches

TL;DR: Using text mining to prioritise the order in which items are screened should be considered safe and ready for use in ‘live’ reviews, and the use of text mining as a ‘second screener’ may also be used cautiously.
Journal Article

“Brimful of STARLITE”: toward standards for reporting literature searches

TL;DR: Considerable variation exists in search methods for qualitative systematic reviews, and major concerns remain about the absence of an accepted standard and the consequent poor quality of reporting.
Related Papers (5)