scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values

TLDR
Application of this standardized QST protocol in patients and human surrogate models will allow to infer underlying mechanisms from somatosensory phenotypes as well as judge plus or minus signs in patients.
Abstract
The nationwide multicenter trials of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) aim to characterize the somatosensory phenotype of patients with neuropathic pain. For this purpose, we have implemented a standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol giving a complete profile for one region within 30 min. To judge plus or minus signs in patients we have now established age- and gender-matched absolute and relative QST reference values from 180 healthy subjects, assessed bilaterally over face, hand and foot. We determined thermal detection and pain thresholds including a test for paradoxical heat sensations, mechanical detection thresholds to von Frey filaments and a 64 Hz tuning fork, mechanical pain thresholds to pinprick stimuli and blunt pressure, stimulus/response-functions for pinprick and dynamic mechanical allodynia, and pain summation (wind-up ratio). QST parameters were region specific and age dependent. Pain thresholds were significantly lower in women than men. Detection thresholds were generally independent of gender. Reference data were normalized to the specific group means and variances (region, age, gender) by calculating z-scores. Due to confidence limits close to the respective limits of the possible data range, heat hypoalgesia, cold hypoalgesia, and mechanical hyperesthesia can hardly be diagnosed. Nevertheless, these parameters can be used for group comparisons. Sensitivity is enhanced by side-to-side comparisons by a factor ranging from 1.1 to 2.5. Relative comparisons across body regions do not offer advantages over absolute reference values. Application of this standardized QST protocol in patients and human surrogate models will allow to infer underlying mechanisms from somatosensory phenotypes.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain.

TL;DR: Diagnostic criteria to establish the presence of central sensitization in patients will greatly assist the phenotyping of patients for choosing treatments that produce analgesia by normalizing hyperexcitable central neural activity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Neuropathic pain: diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment

TL;DR: A better understanding of neuropathic pain and of the translation of pathophysiological mechanisms into sensory signs will lead to a more effective and specific mechanism-based treatment approach.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain.

TL;DR: Here, a conceptual framework for the contribution of plasticity in primary sensory and dorsal horn neurons to the pathogenesis of pain is developed, identifying distinct forms of Plasticity, which are term activation, modulation, and modification, that by increasing gain, elicit pain hypersensitivity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advances in Neuropathic Pain: Diagnosis, Mechanisms, and Treatment Recommendations

TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe current approaches to the diagnosis and assessment of neuropathic pain and discuss the results of recent research on its pathophysiologic mechanisms, and provide specific recommendations for use of these medications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials

TL;DR: A comprehensive QST protocol is compiled using well established tests for nearly all aspects of somatosensation to test for patterns of sensory loss or gain, and to assess both cutaneous and deep pain sensitivity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis.

TL;DR: The meta‐analytic methodology used to provide quantitative evidence to address the question of the magnitude of sex differences in response to experimentally induced pain found the effect size to range from large to moderate, depending on whether threshold or tolerance were measured and which method of stimulus administration was used.
Related Papers (5)