Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey,Guido W. Imbens +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper provides a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects, and proposes an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation.Abstract:
In this paper we propose methods for estimating heterogeneity in causal effects in experimental and observational studies and for conducting hypothesis tests about the magnitude of differences in treatment effects across subsets of the population. We provide a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects. The approach enables the construction of valid confidence intervals for treatment effects, even with many covariates relative to the sample size, and without “sparsity” assumptions. We propose an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation. Our approach builds on regression tree methods, modified to optimize for goodness of fit in treatment effects and to account for honest estimation. Our model selection criterion anticipates that bias will be eliminated by honest estimation and also accounts for the effect of making additional splits on the variance of treatment effect estimates within each subpopulation. We address the challenge that the “ground truth” for a causal effect is not observed for any individual unit, so that standard approaches to cross-validation must be modified. Through a simulation study, we show that for our preferred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas coverage ranges between 74% and 84% for nonhonest approaches. Honest estimation requires estimating the model with a smaller sample size; the cost in terms of mean squared error of treatment effects for our preferred method ranges between 7–22%.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The LOOP Estimator: Adjusting for Covariates in Randomized Experiments
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors specify in advance the statistical analyses that will be used to analyze the data in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and these analyses will involve a...
Posted Content
Learning Optimal Policies from Observational Data.
TL;DR: T theoretical bounds on estimation errors of counterfactuals from observational data are presented by making connections to domain adaptation theory and a principled way of choosing optimal policies using domain adversarial neural networks is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Improve Chronic Disease Care: Methods and Application to Pharmacotherapy Decision Support for Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
Shinji Tarumi,Takeuchi Wataru,George Chalkidis,Salvador Rodriguez-Loya,Junichi Kuwata,Michael Flynn,Kyle Turner,Farrant Sakaguchi,Charlene R. Weir,Heidi Kramer,David Shields,Phillip B. Warner,Polina V. Kukhareva,Hideyuki Ban,Kensaku Kawamoto +14 more
TL;DR: In this article, an AI-driven clinical decision support system (CDSS) integrated with the electronic health record (EHR) was developed by encapsulating the prediction models in an OpenCDS Web service module and delivering the model outputs through a SMART on FHIR (Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) web-based dashboard.
Journal ArticleDOI
Heterogeneous Employment Effects of Job Search Programmes: A Machine Learning Approach
TL;DR: In this article, the effect heterogeneity of job search programs for unemployed workers was investigated using non-experimental causal empirical models with Lasso-type estimators, and they found considerable heterogeneities only during the first six months after the start of training.
Journal ArticleDOI
Non-separable models with high-dimensional data
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a three-step estimation procedure to estimate the average, quantile, and marginal treatment effects for non-separable models with a continuous treatment when the dimension of the control variables is high and potentially larger than the effective sample size.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Random Forests
TL;DR: Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the forest, and are also applicable to regression.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
TL;DR: A new method for estimation in linear models called the lasso, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a constant, is proposed.
Book
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
TL;DR: Setting of the learning problem consistency of learning processes bounds on the rate of convergence ofLearning processes controlling the generalization ability of learning process constructing learning algorithms what is important in learning theory?
Statistical learning theory
TL;DR: Presenting a method for determining the necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of learning process, the author covers function estimates from small data pools, applying these estimations to real-life problems, and much more.
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Related Papers (5)
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Stefan Wager,Susan Athey +1 more