Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey,Guido W. Imbens +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper provides a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects, and proposes an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation.Abstract:
In this paper we propose methods for estimating heterogeneity in causal effects in experimental and observational studies and for conducting hypothesis tests about the magnitude of differences in treatment effects across subsets of the population. We provide a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects. The approach enables the construction of valid confidence intervals for treatment effects, even with many covariates relative to the sample size, and without “sparsity” assumptions. We propose an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation. Our approach builds on regression tree methods, modified to optimize for goodness of fit in treatment effects and to account for honest estimation. Our model selection criterion anticipates that bias will be eliminated by honest estimation and also accounts for the effect of making additional splits on the variance of treatment effect estimates within each subpopulation. We address the challenge that the “ground truth” for a causal effect is not observed for any individual unit, so that standard approaches to cross-validation must be modified. Through a simulation study, we show that for our preferred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas coverage ranges between 74% and 84% for nonhonest approaches. Honest estimation requires estimating the model with a smaller sample size; the cost in terms of mean squared error of treatment effects for our preferred method ranges between 7–22%.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Machine learning and AI in marketing – Connecting computing power to human insights
Liye Ma,Baohong Sun +1 more
TL;DR: A unified conceptual framework and a multi-faceted research agenda are presented that argue that machine learning methods can process large-scale and unstructured data, and have flexible model structures that yield strong predictive performance and that such methods may lack model transparency and interpretability.
Posted Content
Estimating Treatment Effects with Causal Forests: An Application
Susan Athey,Stefan Wager +1 more
TL;DR: The authors apply causal forests to a dataset derived from the National Study of Learning Mindsets, and consider resulting practical and conceptual challenges, and discuss how causal forests use estimated propensity scores to be more robust to confounding and how they handle data with clustered errors.
Posted Content
Machine Learning Methods Economists Should Know About
Susan Athey,Guido W. Imbens +1 more
TL;DR: Newly developed methods at the intersection of ML and econometrics, methods that typically perform better than either off-the-shelf ML or more traditional econometric methods when applied to particular classes of problems, are highlighted.
Journal ArticleDOI
Data ex Machina: Introduction to Big Data
TL;DR: It is argued that there is enormous potential in using big data to study a variety of phenomena that remain difficult to observe, however, there are some recurring vulnerabilities that should be addressed.
Posted Content
Text as Data
TL;DR: An introduction to the use of text as an input to economic research is provided, the features that make text different from other forms of data are discussed, and a practical overview of relevant statistical methods is offered.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Random Forests
TL;DR: Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the forest, and are also applicable to regression.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
TL;DR: A new method for estimation in linear models called the lasso, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a constant, is proposed.
Book
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
TL;DR: Setting of the learning problem consistency of learning processes bounds on the rate of convergence ofLearning processes controlling the generalization ability of learning process constructing learning algorithms what is important in learning theory?
Statistical learning theory
TL;DR: Presenting a method for determining the necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of learning process, the author covers function estimates from small data pools, applying these estimations to real-life problems, and much more.
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Related Papers (5)
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Stefan Wager,Susan Athey +1 more