Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey,Guido W. Imbens +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper provides a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects, and proposes an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation.Abstract:
In this paper we propose methods for estimating heterogeneity in causal effects in experimental and observational studies and for conducting hypothesis tests about the magnitude of differences in treatment effects across subsets of the population. We provide a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects. The approach enables the construction of valid confidence intervals for treatment effects, even with many covariates relative to the sample size, and without “sparsity” assumptions. We propose an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation. Our approach builds on regression tree methods, modified to optimize for goodness of fit in treatment effects and to account for honest estimation. Our model selection criterion anticipates that bias will be eliminated by honest estimation and also accounts for the effect of making additional splits on the variance of treatment effect estimates within each subpopulation. We address the challenge that the “ground truth” for a causal effect is not observed for any individual unit, so that standard approaches to cross-validation must be modified. Through a simulation study, we show that for our preferred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas coverage ranges between 74% and 84% for nonhonest approaches. Honest estimation requires estimating the model with a smaller sample size; the cost in terms of mean squared error of treatment effects for our preferred method ranges between 7–22%.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Causal inference in travel demand modeling (and the lack thereof)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that travel demand modeling should be one of the many fields that focuses on the production of valid causal inferences, and explore the potential benefits of uniting these two disciplines.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluating heterogeneity of treatment effects
TL;DR: This paper describes approaches to analyzing and reporting trials with explicit consideration of heterogeneity, in order to improve the ability to treat individual patients more effectively.
Posted ContentDOI
Personalized Prescription of ACEI/ARBs for Hypertensive COVID-19 Patients
Dimitris Bertsimas,Alison Borenstein,Luca Mingardi,Omid Nohadani,Agni Orfanoudaki,Bartolomeo Stellato,Holly Wiberg,Pankaj Sarin,Dirk Varelmann,Vicente Estrada,Carlos Macaya,Iván J. Núñez Gil +11 more
TL;DR: This work offers the first personalized recommendation system to accurately evaluate the efficacy and risks of prescribing ACEIs and ARBs to hypertensive COVID-19 patients and develops an interactive interface for the algorithm, providing physicians with an actionable tool to easily assess treatment alternatives and inform clinical decisions.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Personalized Treatment Selection using Causal Heterogeneity
Ye Tu,Kinjal Basu,Cyrus DiCiccio,Romil Bansal,Preetam Nandy,Padmini Jaikumar,Shaunak Chatterjee +6 more
TL;DR: In this article, a framework for personalization through estimation of heterogeneous treatment effect at either a cohort or member level is developed, followed by selection of optimal treatment variants for cohorts (or members) obtained through (deterministic or stochastic) constrained optimization.
Journal ArticleDOI
Utilities of Artificial Intelligence in Poverty Prediction: A Review
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors investigate utilities of AI in poverty prediction via finding answers to the following research questions: (1) How many papers on utilities of artificial intelligence in poverty predictions were published up until March, 2022? (2) Which approach to poverty was applied when AI was used for poverty prediction? (3) Which AI methods were applied for predicting poverty, and (4) What data were used for prediction via AI? (5) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the created AI models for poverty predictions?
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Random Forests
TL;DR: Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the forest, and are also applicable to regression.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
TL;DR: A new method for estimation in linear models called the lasso, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a constant, is proposed.
Book
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
TL;DR: Setting of the learning problem consistency of learning processes bounds on the rate of convergence ofLearning processes controlling the generalization ability of learning process constructing learning algorithms what is important in learning theory?
Statistical learning theory
TL;DR: Presenting a method for determining the necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of learning process, the author covers function estimates from small data pools, applying these estimations to real-life problems, and much more.
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Related Papers (5)
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Stefan Wager,Susan Athey +1 more