Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey,Guido W. Imbens +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper provides a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects, and proposes an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation.Abstract:
In this paper we propose methods for estimating heterogeneity in causal effects in experimental and observational studies and for conducting hypothesis tests about the magnitude of differences in treatment effects across subsets of the population. We provide a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects. The approach enables the construction of valid confidence intervals for treatment effects, even with many covariates relative to the sample size, and without “sparsity” assumptions. We propose an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation. Our approach builds on regression tree methods, modified to optimize for goodness of fit in treatment effects and to account for honest estimation. Our model selection criterion anticipates that bias will be eliminated by honest estimation and also accounts for the effect of making additional splits on the variance of treatment effect estimates within each subpopulation. We address the challenge that the “ground truth” for a causal effect is not observed for any individual unit, so that standard approaches to cross-validation must be modified. Through a simulation study, we show that for our preferred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas coverage ranges between 74% and 84% for nonhonest approaches. Honest estimation requires estimating the model with a smaller sample size; the cost in terms of mean squared error of treatment effects for our preferred method ranges between 7–22%.read more
Citations
More filters
Posted Content
A Survey on Causal Inference
TL;DR: This survey provides a comprehensive review of causal inference methods under the potential outcome framework, one of the well-known causal inference frameworks, and presents the plausible applications of these methods, including the applications in advertising, recommendation, medicine, and so on.
Posted Content
Optimal doubly robust estimation of heterogeneous causal effects
TL;DR: A two-stage doubly robust CATE estimator is studied and a generic model-free error bound is given and it is shown that this estimator can be oracle efficient under even weaker conditions, if used with a specialized form of sample splitting and careful choices of tuning parameters.
Posted Content
Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competition
TL;DR: The 2016 Atlantic Causal Inference Challenge as discussed by the authors was the first attempt to evaluate the performance of causal inference data analysis, with 30 participants participating in two versions of the challenge, black box algorithms and do-it-yourself analyses.
Journal ArticleDOI
Quasi-oracle estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects
Xinkun Nie,Stefan Wager +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a general class of two-step algorithms for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation in observational studies is developed, which can use any loss-minimization method, e.g., penalized regression, deep neural networks, or boosting, and can be fine-tuned by cross validation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Automated versus Do-It-Yourself Methods for Causal Inference: Lessons Learned from a Data Analysis Competition
TL;DR: The 2016 Atlantic Causal Inference Challenge as mentioned in this paper was the first attempt to evaluate causal inference data analysis, and 30 competing methods were evaluated across the two versions of the competition (black-box algorithms and do-it-yourself analyses) along with post hoc analyses that reveal information about the characteristics of causal inference strategies and settings that affect performance.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Random Forests
TL;DR: Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the forest, and are also applicable to regression.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
TL;DR: A new method for estimation in linear models called the lasso, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a constant, is proposed.
Book
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
TL;DR: Setting of the learning problem consistency of learning processes bounds on the rate of convergence ofLearning processes controlling the generalization ability of learning process constructing learning algorithms what is important in learning theory?
Statistical learning theory
TL;DR: Presenting a method for determining the necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of learning process, the author covers function estimates from small data pools, applying these estimations to real-life problems, and much more.
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Related Papers (5)
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Stefan Wager,Susan Athey +1 more