Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey,Guido W. Imbens +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper provides a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects, and proposes an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation.Abstract:
In this paper we propose methods for estimating heterogeneity in causal effects in experimental and observational studies and for conducting hypothesis tests about the magnitude of differences in treatment effects across subsets of the population. We provide a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects. The approach enables the construction of valid confidence intervals for treatment effects, even with many covariates relative to the sample size, and without “sparsity” assumptions. We propose an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation. Our approach builds on regression tree methods, modified to optimize for goodness of fit in treatment effects and to account for honest estimation. Our model selection criterion anticipates that bias will be eliminated by honest estimation and also accounts for the effect of making additional splits on the variance of treatment effect estimates within each subpopulation. We address the challenge that the “ground truth” for a causal effect is not observed for any individual unit, so that standard approaches to cross-validation must be modified. Through a simulation study, we show that for our preferred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas coverage ranges between 74% and 84% for nonhonest approaches. Honest estimation requires estimating the model with a smaller sample size; the cost in terms of mean squared error of treatment effects for our preferred method ranges between 7–22%.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preserving User Privacy Through Ephemeral Sharing Design: A Large-Scale Randomized Field Experiment in Online Dating
TL;DR: In this article, a large-scale randomized field experiment with over 70k users was conducted to understand how ephemeral sharing influences users' information sharing, match outcomes, and follow-up conversational engagements.
Dissertation
Essays in Semiparametric Econometrics
TL;DR: In this article, the authors study how the estimation of first-stage nuisance parameters associated with control and instrumental variables affects second-stage estimation of treatment-effect parameters and show that the standard least-squares estimator is dominated with respect to variance in the treatment effect when treatment is exogenous.
Journal ArticleDOI
Targeted L1-Regularization and Joint Modeling of Neural Networks for Causal Inference
TL;DR: Two NN architectures with an L1-regularization on specific NN parameters are used and investigated to investigate how their certain hyperparameters should be tuned in the presence of confounders and IVs to achieve a low bias-variance tradeoff for ATE estimators such as AIPW estimator.
Posted ContentDOI
Performance metrics for models designed to predict individualized treatment effect
Carolien Maas,David M. Kent,Michael C. Hughes,Rommert Dekker,Hester F. Lingsma,David van Klaveren +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors defined the observed treatment effect as the difference between outcomes in pairs of matched patients and proposed metrics of calibration and overall performance for models predicting treatment effect, which can be used to assess the calibration and the overall performance of models predicting individualized treatment effect.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessment of heterogeneous treatment effect estimation accuracy via matching.
TL;DR: In this article, a matching distance derived from proximity scores in random forests is proposed to assess the accuracy of heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) estimation, where the HTE is not directly observable so standard prediction errors is not applicable.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Random Forests
TL;DR: Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the forest, and are also applicable to regression.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
TL;DR: A new method for estimation in linear models called the lasso, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a constant, is proposed.
Book
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
TL;DR: Setting of the learning problem consistency of learning processes bounds on the rate of convergence ofLearning processes controlling the generalization ability of learning process constructing learning algorithms what is important in learning theory?
Statistical learning theory
TL;DR: Presenting a method for determining the necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of learning process, the author covers function estimates from small data pools, applying these estimations to real-life problems, and much more.
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Related Papers (5)
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Stefan Wager,Susan Athey +1 more