Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey,Guido W. Imbens +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper provides a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects, and proposes an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation.Abstract:
In this paper we propose methods for estimating heterogeneity in causal effects in experimental and observational studies and for conducting hypothesis tests about the magnitude of differences in treatment effects across subsets of the population. We provide a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects. The approach enables the construction of valid confidence intervals for treatment effects, even with many covariates relative to the sample size, and without “sparsity” assumptions. We propose an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation. Our approach builds on regression tree methods, modified to optimize for goodness of fit in treatment effects and to account for honest estimation. Our model selection criterion anticipates that bias will be eliminated by honest estimation and also accounts for the effect of making additional splits on the variance of treatment effect estimates within each subpopulation. We address the challenge that the “ground truth” for a causal effect is not observed for any individual unit, so that standard approaches to cross-validation must be modified. Through a simulation study, we show that for our preferred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas coverage ranges between 74% and 84% for nonhonest approaches. Honest estimation requires estimating the model with a smaller sample size; the cost in terms of mean squared error of treatment effects for our preferred method ranges between 7–22%.read more
Citations
More filters
Posted Content
Learning Continuous Treatment Policy and Bipartite Embeddings for Matching with Heterogeneous Causal Effects.
TL;DR: The proposal to decompose treatment effect functions into effectiveness factors presents a framework to model a rich space of actions using causal inference, and utilizes deep learning to optimize the desired holistic metric space instead of predicting single-dimensional treatment counterfactual.
Counterfactual Prediction Methods for Causal Inference in Observational Studies with Continuous Treatments
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a counterfactual prediction method based on the potential outcomes framework that estimates the expected value of a potential outcome given a treatment level and confounders.
Posted Content
Estimation of Personalized Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using Concatenation and Augmentation of Feature Vectors
TL;DR: In this paper, a meta-algorithm for estimating the conditional average treatment effects is proposed, which is based on the assumption that the number of controls is rather large and the control outcome function is precisely determined.
Journal ArticleDOI
The German Minimum Wage and Wage Growth: Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using Causal Forests
TL;DR: In this article, the generalized random forest implementation of Athey et al. (2019) in a difference-in-differences setting was adapted to a difference in-difference setting to detect the potentially spurious nature of heterogeneities in subgroups chosen ex-ante.
Posted Content
Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Residential Demand Response
TL;DR: This work evaluates the causal effect of hour-ahead price interventions on the reduction in residential electricity consumption using a data set from a large-scale experiment on 7,000 households in California, and leverages causal decision trees to detect treatment effect heterogeneity across users by incorporating census data.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Random Forests
TL;DR: Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the forest, and are also applicable to regression.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
TL;DR: A new method for estimation in linear models called the lasso, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a constant, is proposed.
Book
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
TL;DR: Setting of the learning problem consistency of learning processes bounds on the rate of convergence ofLearning processes controlling the generalization ability of learning process constructing learning algorithms what is important in learning theory?
Statistical learning theory
TL;DR: Presenting a method for determining the necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of learning process, the author covers function estimates from small data pools, applying these estimations to real-life problems, and much more.
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Related Papers (5)
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Stefan Wager,Susan Athey +1 more