Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey,Guido W. Imbens +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper provides a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects, and proposes an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation.Abstract:
In this paper we propose methods for estimating heterogeneity in causal effects in experimental and observational studies and for conducting hypothesis tests about the magnitude of differences in treatment effects across subsets of the population. We provide a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects. The approach enables the construction of valid confidence intervals for treatment effects, even with many covariates relative to the sample size, and without “sparsity” assumptions. We propose an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation. Our approach builds on regression tree methods, modified to optimize for goodness of fit in treatment effects and to account for honest estimation. Our model selection criterion anticipates that bias will be eliminated by honest estimation and also accounts for the effect of making additional splits on the variance of treatment effect estimates within each subpopulation. We address the challenge that the “ground truth” for a causal effect is not observed for any individual unit, so that standard approaches to cross-validation must be modified. Through a simulation study, we show that for our preferred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas coverage ranges between 74% and 84% for nonhonest approaches. Honest estimation requires estimating the model with a smaller sample size; the cost in terms of mean squared error of treatment effects for our preferred method ranges between 7–22%.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors take a step back from the burgeoning experimental literature and introduce 12 actions that might help to alleviate this credibility crisis and raise experimental economics to an even higher level.
Journal ArticleDOI
Remote sensing-based measurement of Living Environment Deprivation: Improving classical approaches with machine learning.
TL;DR: Evidence on the usefulness of very high spatial resolution (VHR) imagery in gathering socioeconomic information in urban settlements is provided and the potential of the Gradient Boost Regressor and Random Forests to improve predictive performance and accuracy is explored.
Posted Content
Goals and Gaps: Educational Careers of Immigrant Children
TL;DR: The authors studied the educational choices of children of immigrants in a tracked school system and found that immigrants in Italy enroll disproportionately into vocational high schools, as opposed to technical and academically-oriented high schools.
Journal ArticleDOI
Using data mining techniques to characterize participation in observational studies.
Ariel Linden,Paul R. Yarnold +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and classification tree analysis (CTA) to identify characteristics of individuals who do and do not choose to participate in observational studies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reflection on modern methods: generalized linear models for prognosis and intervention-theory, practice and implications for machine learning.
Kellyn F Arnold,Vinny Davies,Marc de Kamps,Peter W. G. Tennant,Peter W. G. Tennant,John Mbotwa,Mark S. Gilthorpe,Mark S. Gilthorpe +7 more
TL;DR: Five primary ways in which generalized linear models for prediction differ from GLMs for causal inference are identified, which will help ensure that both prediction and causal modelling are used appropriately and to greatest effect in health research.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Random Forests
TL;DR: Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the forest, and are also applicable to regression.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
TL;DR: A new method for estimation in linear models called the lasso, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a constant, is proposed.
Book
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
TL;DR: Setting of the learning problem consistency of learning processes bounds on the rate of convergence ofLearning processes controlling the generalization ability of learning process constructing learning algorithms what is important in learning theory?
Statistical learning theory
TL;DR: Presenting a method for determining the necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of learning process, the author covers function estimates from small data pools, applying these estimations to real-life problems, and much more.
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Related Papers (5)
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Stefan Wager,Susan Athey +1 more