Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey,Guido W. Imbens +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper provides a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects, and proposes an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation.Abstract:
In this paper we propose methods for estimating heterogeneity in causal effects in experimental and observational studies and for conducting hypothesis tests about the magnitude of differences in treatment effects across subsets of the population. We provide a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects. The approach enables the construction of valid confidence intervals for treatment effects, even with many covariates relative to the sample size, and without “sparsity” assumptions. We propose an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation. Our approach builds on regression tree methods, modified to optimize for goodness of fit in treatment effects and to account for honest estimation. Our model selection criterion anticipates that bias will be eliminated by honest estimation and also accounts for the effect of making additional splits on the variance of treatment effect estimates within each subpopulation. We address the challenge that the “ground truth” for a causal effect is not observed for any individual unit, so that standard approaches to cross-validation must be modified. Through a simulation study, we show that for our preferred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas coverage ranges between 74% and 84% for nonhonest approaches. Honest estimation requires estimating the model with a smaller sample size; the cost in terms of mean squared error of treatment effects for our preferred method ranges between 7–22%.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Social Comparison and Energy Conservation: Mechanism, Heterogeneity and Timing
TL;DR: In this article, the authors conducted a survey-based experiment to detect how energy conservation based on social comparison occurs by applying billing and payment data, and they found that households will reduce their daily energy consumption by 4.4% on average.
Journal ArticleDOI
Learning end-to-end patient representations through self-supervised covariate balancing for causal treatment effect estimation
TL;DR: This paper proposed a self-balancing self-supervised objective to learn representations that induce similar distributions of the treated and control cohorts, and demonstrated that the reduction in error can be directly attributed to learning representations that explicitly reduce such dissimilarity; further, in case of violations of the positivity assumption (frequent in observational data), they show their approach performs significantly better than the previous state of the art.
Journal ArticleDOI
25 Years of European Merger Control
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors study the evolution of EC merger decisions over the first 25 years of common European merger policy and find that dominance is positively correlated with competitive concerns, especially in concentrated markets and in complex mergers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Wolves' contribution to structural change in grazing systems among swiss alpine summer farms: The evidence from causal random forest
TL;DR: In this article , the authors examined the relationship between wolf attacks and the decline of Alpine summer farms, a specific high-altitude farm type, using a causal random forest method, and found that a high number of wolf attacks in a region is related to faster decrease in number of grazing systems where sheep are most vulnerable to such attacks.
Journal ArticleDOI
Estimation and Inference on Nonlinear and Heterogeneous Effects
Marc Ratkovic,Dustin Tingley +1 more
TL;DR: The Method of Direct Estimation and Inference (MDEI) is introduced that embraces potential complexities, is interpretable, has desirable theoretical guarantees, and, unlike some existing methods, returns appropriate uncertainty estimates.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Random Forests
TL;DR: Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the forest, and are also applicable to regression.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
TL;DR: A new method for estimation in linear models called the lasso, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a constant, is proposed.
Book
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
TL;DR: Setting of the learning problem consistency of learning processes bounds on the rate of convergence ofLearning processes controlling the generalization ability of learning process constructing learning algorithms what is important in learning theory?
Statistical learning theory
TL;DR: Presenting a method for determining the necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of learning process, the author covers function estimates from small data pools, applying these estimations to real-life problems, and much more.
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Related Papers (5)
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Stefan Wager,Susan Athey +1 more